Table 2.
Category | Staining intensity | Patchiness | Central artefact | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lost | Preserved | Indeterminate | Inadequate | Strong | Weak | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
pMMR BIOPSY SERIES 86 (prospective) | |||||||||||||
MLH1 | 0 | 85 | 1 | 0 | 85 | 1 | 69 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 86 | 0 | 0 |
PMS2 | 0 | 84 | 1 | 1a | 70 | 15 | 66 | 14 | 4 | 1 | 86 | 0 | 0 |
MSH2 | 0 | 86 | 0 | 0 | 86 | 0 | 86 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 86 | 0 | 0 |
MSH6 | 0 | 86 | 0 | 0 | 86 | 0 | 86 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 86 | 0 | 0 |
dMMR BIOPSY SERIES - 55 (17 prospective and 38 retrospective) | |||||||||||||
MLH1 | 20 | 3 | 31 | 1a | 44 | 10 | 53 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 55 | 0 | 0 |
PMS2 | 46 | 2 | 1 | 6a | 38 | 11 | 55 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 55 | 0 | 0 |
MSH2 | 1 | 54 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 5 | 55 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 55 | 0 | 0 |
MSH6 | 3 | 52 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 5 | 55b | 0 | 0 | 0 | 55 | 0 | 0 |
pMMR SURGICAL RESECTION SERIES - 48 (prospective) | |||||||||||||
MLH1 | 0 | 48 | 0 | 0 | 44 | 4 | 13 | 17 | 12 | 6 | 32 | 4 | 12 |
PMS2 | 0 | 48 | 0 | 0 | 39 | 9 | 13 | 11 | 14 | 10 | 36 | 2 | 10 |
MSH2 | 0 | 48 | 0 | 0 | 47 | 1 | 38 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 45 | 0 | 3 |
MSH6 | 0 | 48 | 0 | 0 | 47 | 1 | 35 | 8 | 2 | 3 | 43 | 2 | 3 |
dMMR SURGICAL RESECTION SERIES - 49 (11 prospective and 38 retrospective) | |||||||||||||
MLH1 | 44 | 3 | 1 | 1a | 33 | 15 | 25 | 9 | 8 | 6 | 38 | 1 | 9 |
PMS2 | 45 | 3 | 0 | 1a | 38 | 10 | 30 | 4 | 9 | 5 | 40 | 3 | 5 |
MSH2 | 1 | 48c | 0 | 0 | 44 | 5 | 25 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 39 | 3 | 7 |
MSH6 | 2 | 47d | 0 | 0 | 48 | 1 | 29 | 5 | 7 | 8 | 42 | 2 | 5 |
pMMR proficient MMR; dMMR deficient
aInadequate cases were not evaluated for other variables
bOne biopsy case showed loss of MLH1/PMS2 with sub-clonal loss of MSH6 on biopsy (confirmed on the resection specimen)
c Two cases showed sub-clonal loss
d Three cases showed sub-clonal loss