Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 1;17(4):904–914. doi: 10.1007/s12072-023-10491-3

Table 2.

Effects of BMI and prognostic factors on overall survival after atezolizumab and bevacizumab in univariate and multivariate Cox regression models

Univariate models Multivariable models
Hazard ratio (95% CI) p value Hazard ratio (95% CI) p value
BMI 25+  1.00 (0.60–1.64) 0.98 0.72 (0.42–1.23) 0.23
BCLC stage (C vs A or B) 1.50 (0.89–2.52) 0.13 1.06 (0.57–1.97) 0.85
CTP class (B vs A) 3.01 (1.77–5.13) < 0.001 2.44 (1.35–4.42) 0.003
Tumour size > 7 cm 1.30 (0.77–2.20) 0.32 1.04 (0.61–1.78) 0.89
MVI 2.51 (1.15–4.18) < 0.001 1.87 (0.99–3.55) 0.05
Metastatic disease 0.80 (0.47–1.36) 0.41 0.88 (0.49–1.57) 0.66
AFP > 400 ng/dL 1.32 (0.79–2.19) 0.29 1.21 (0.71–2.05) 0.49

95% CI 95% confidence interval, BCLC Barcelona clinic liver cancer, CTP Child-Turcotte-Pugh, MVI Macrovascular invasion, AFP alpha-fetoprotein