Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 26;62(8):1063–1079. doi: 10.1007/s40262-023-01284-w

Fig. 11.

Fig. 11

Exposure–efficacy analyses. a Kaplan–Meier probability of progression-free survival (PFS) by simulated brigatinib exposure quartiles. To evaluate the relationship between brigatinib exposure and PFS, a static exposure metric of time‐averaged area under the plasma concentration–time curve (AUC) between the last two disease assessment scans preceding progression or censoring was used. Progression-free survival Kaplan–Meier estimates plotted by exposure quartiles suggested that patients with higher exposure had a faster onset and a higher incidence of disease progression than those with lower exposure. Values for the crizotinib arm of the study are superimposed; however, no exposure values were available for crizotinib. For median PFS values, NA indicates that the probability of having no disease progression or death has not yet gone beyond 0.50 and hence the median survival time cannot be determined. aSimulated exposure metric is time‐averaged AUC between the last two disease assessment scans preceding progression for PFS or censoring. Observed (Obs) incidence and model‐predicted probability of b objective response rate (ORR) and c intracranial objective response rate (iORR) as a function of brigatinib exposure. The relationships between ORR and iORR and brigatinib exposure were analyzed using the static exposure metric of time‐averaged AUC between the last two disease assessment scans preceding best confirmed response. The probability of response was plotted against predicted exposure values, and probabilities were calculated by observed exposure quartiles or tertiles. Exposure–clinical response relationships were characterized by logistic regression models, which did not show a significant relationship between the probability of achieving ORR and time‐averaged brigatinib AUC between the last two disease assessment scans preceding the best confirmed objective response. In contrast, time‐averaged brigatinib AUC between the last two disease assessment scans preceding best confirmed intracranial response was a statistically significant predictor of iORR in patients with brain metastases at baseline. Dotted curves represent the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the logistic regression model prediction. The horizontal black line separated by vertical black solid lines denotes the brigatinib exposure range in each quartile (ORR) and tertile (iORR). Black dots (vertical lines) represent the observed proportion of patients (95% CI) in each quartile (ORR) and tertile (iORR). n/N is the number of patients with events/total number of patients in each quartile (ORR) and tertile (iORR). Gray open circles represent observed individual data [25]. NA not available. Reprinted from Gupta et al. [25]