Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 23;38(8):1867–1879. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfac340

Table 2:

Cox regression analyses of urinary lithium excretion with graft failure and kidney function decline in 642 KTRs.

Graft failure Kidney function decline
Model HR (95% CI) per log2 μmol/24 h P-value HR (95% CI) per log2 μmol/24 h P-value
Model 1 0.54 (0.38–0.79) .002 0.73 (0.54–0.99) .041
Model 2 0.55 (0.38–0.79) .002 0.72 (0.53–0.97) .028
Model 3 0.59 (0.41–0.86) .006 0.73 (0.54–0.98) .031
Model 4 0.59 (0.41–0.85) .005 0.71 (0.53–0.95) .021
Model 5 0.62 (0.42–0.91) .016 0.73 (0.54–1.00) .054
Events, n (%) 79 (12) 102 (16)

Graft failure was defined as start of dialysis or retransplantation and kidney function decline was defined as a doubling of serum creatinine.

Urinary lithium excretion was log2 transformed prior to analyses.

Model 1: crude. Model 2: adjusted for age and sex. Model 3: model 2, additionally adjusted for BSA, eGFR (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation based on both serum creatine and cystatin C) and urinary protein excretion. Model 4: model 3, additionally adjusted for smoking status and alcohol intake. Model 5: model 3, additionally adjusted for time between transplantation and baseline, the number of transplantations up to baseline, HLA antibodies, pre-emptive transplantation, deceased donor, donor age, history of rejection, warm ischaemia time, calcineurin inhibitors and proliferation inhibitors.