Table 3.
Overall effectiveness of prophylactic infusions measured by Likert scale (safety analysis set).
| Treatment effectiveness measured by Likert scale | Classification of infusion | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prophylaxis ,n (%) (n = 11,414) |
On-demand, n (%) (n = 1320) |
Unclassified, n (%) (n = 5) |
Total, n (%) (n = 12,739) |
|
| Excellent | 2123 (18.6) | 194 (14.7) | 1 (20.0) | 2318 (18.2) |
| Good | 8957 (78.5) | 956 (72.4) | 4 (80.0) | 9917 (77.8) |
| Fair | 276 (2.4) | 156 (11.8) | 0 (0.0) | 432 (3.4) |
| Poor | 58 (0.5) | 14 (1.1) | 0 (0.0) | 72 (0.6) |
Data presented by treatment group at screening. Data presented for patients receiving on-demand therapy at screening switched to prophylaxis during the study. The treatment columns are defined as the infusion type specified in the infusion log. In instances where the infusion type was not specified, the infusion was considered as unclassified. Effectiveness of prophylactic treatment was based on the number of infusions in the infusion log. Classification of infusion as documented by the patient or caregiver for treatments given at home or by the investigator for treatments given in the hospital/clinic. For patients receiving on-demand therapy, infusions that were classified as prophylactic were excluded.