Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 28;9(3):e003340. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003340

Table 4.

Impact of male sex on spinal radiographic progression in axSpA

Definition of progression Variable Cervical spine Lumbar spine
OR 95% CI P value OR 95% CI P value
≥2 mSASSS units Male sex (total effect) 2.57 1.23 to 5.38 0.01 2.23 1.14 to 4.40 0.02
TNFi use prior to X-ray interval 0.65 0.39 to 1.08 0.10 0.66 0.40 to 1.11 0.12
Length of the X-ray interval (+ 1 year) 1.04 0.52 to 2.07 0.91 1.16 0.58 to 2.32 0.67
≥1 new syndesmophyte Male sex (total effect) 6.51 2.71 to 15.6 <0.001 5.12 2.26 to 11.6 <0.001
TNFi use prior to X-ray interval 0.98 0.59 to 1.62 0.93 0.54 0.32 to 0.91 0.02
Length of the X-ray interval (+ 1 year) 1.99 0.96 to 4.10 0.06 0.66 0.77 to 3.59 0.20

Results from different multivariable models with spinal radiographic progression defined as an increase of ≥2 mSASSS units in 2 years or as the formation of ≥1 new syndesmophyte in 2 years. Analyses performed in 724 radiographic intervals from 505 patients (59 events in the cervical spine and 64 events in the lumbar spine with progression defined as ≥2 mSASSS units and 62 events in the cervical spine and 69 events in the lumbar spine with progression defined as formation of ≥1 new syndesmophyte). The total effect of sex on radiographic progression includes a direct effect as well as in indirect effect via an impact of baseline spinal radiographic damage.

axSpA, axial spondyloarthritis; mSASSS, Modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal Score; TNFi, tumour necrosis factor inhibitor.