Table 1. Microvascular obstruction triggers: analysis of experimental data (continued).
Hypothetical trigger | Species | Experimental model | Effect | Ref. |
CAO: coronary artery occlusion; CBF: coronary blood flow; CPP: coronary perfusion pressure; ERK1/2: extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2; HINT2: histidine triad nucleotide-binding 2; HUVEC: human umbilical vein endothelial cells; LV: left ventricle; MPO: marker of neutrophil myeloperoxidase; MVO: microvascular obstruction; NLRP3: (NOD)-like receptor pyrin domain containing 3; ROS: reactive oxygen species; SOD: superoxide dismutase; tBHP: tert-butyl hydroperoxid. | ||||
ROS, Ca2+ overload | Rat | Isolated heart | Acetylcholine-induced vasodilation decreased after reperfusion following tBHP administration | [51] |
Rabbit | CAO and reperfusion in vivo | Gallopamil and SOD reduced the no-reflow area | [52] | |
Dog | CAO and reperfusion in vivo | CBF decreased after three hours of reperfusion. Clentiazem reduced the no-reflow zone and reduced infarct size |
[54] |
|
Rabbit | CAO and reperfusion in vivo | Verapamil had no effect on the no-reflow area and infarct size | [55] | |
Rat | CAO and reperfusion in vivo | Verapamil reduced infarct size | [56] | |
Pig | CAO and reperfusion in vivo | Diltiazem and verapamil reduced the no-reflow area but did not affect infarct size | [57] | |
Mouse | CAO and reperfusion in vivo | HINT2 overexpression promoted a decrease in the no-reflow area | [58] | |
Minipig | CAO and reperfusion in vivo | Fosinopril and valsartan reduced the MVO area | [64] |