Skip to main content
editorial
. 2023 Jul 3;7(1):e162. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.584

Table 1.

Stakeholders engaged and research needed to support the proposed framework

Stakeholder engaged (Phase) Suggested research methods Success markers
Patients eligible for DCT (1) Qualitative semi-structured interviews Community and sociodemographic influences are better understood
Quantitative statistical analyses using baseline data and enrollment status Relationships between DCT enrollment and patient admission status and demographic characteristics are elucidated
DCT Staff/Providers (2) Qualitative semi-structured interviews using questions informed by findings from (1) Research and practice concerns are better understood
Staff/providers distinguish between patient conditions and technologies appropriate or inappropriate for DCTs
Supply chain issues to deliver DCTs are better understood
Policymakers (3) Apply action-research methods to map barriers identified in (1) and (2) to specific state policies/regulations DCT researchers and expert staff have a better understanding of state-level barriers to DCTs
Present findings from (1) and (2) with actionable recommendations from barrier-mapping to policymakers in open forum State changemakers are provided with fit-for-purpose recommendations to facilitate improved DCTs
Survey policymakers engaged about the relevancy of presentation and recommendations Relevant policymakers have a better understanding of basic needs for DCT infrastructure