Table 1.
Stakeholders engaged and research needed to support the proposed framework
| Stakeholder engaged (Phase) | Suggested research methods | Success markers |
|---|---|---|
| Patients eligible for DCT (1) | Qualitative semi-structured interviews | Community and sociodemographic influences are better understood |
| Quantitative statistical analyses using baseline data and enrollment status | Relationships between DCT enrollment and patient admission status and demographic characteristics are elucidated | |
| DCT Staff/Providers (2) | Qualitative semi-structured interviews using questions informed by findings from (1) | Research and practice concerns are better understood |
| Staff/providers distinguish between patient conditions and technologies appropriate or inappropriate for DCTs | ||
| Supply chain issues to deliver DCTs are better understood | ||
| Policymakers (3) | Apply action-research methods to map barriers identified in (1) and (2) to specific state policies/regulations | DCT researchers and expert staff have a better understanding of state-level barriers to DCTs |
| Present findings from (1) and (2) with actionable recommendations from barrier-mapping to policymakers in open forum | State changemakers are provided with fit-for-purpose recommendations to facilitate improved DCTs | |
| Survey policymakers engaged about the relevancy of presentation and recommendations | Relevant policymakers have a better understanding of basic needs for DCT infrastructure |