Abstract
The present study aimed to investigate the nutritional constituents of common market available spices in the United Arab Emirates. Seven commonly consumed spices namely, ginger (Zingiber officinale), cinnamon (Cinnamomum verum), black seed (Nigella sativa), fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum), cardamom (Elettaria cardamomum), cloves (Syzygium aromaticum) and saffron (Crocus sativus) were obtained from local markets. Proximate analyses were performed according to AOAC procedures. Assessment of major (Ca, K, Mg, Na, P and S) and minor (Co, Cu, Fe, Mn and Zn) elements was conducted using inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES). Findings revealed varying macronutrient, micronutrient and mineral contents which are highly valuable for dietary purposes. The present study demonstrates that these edible spices could be used for nutritional support, due to their micro and macronutrient contents.
Key words: Edible spices, Nutrition, Proximate analysis
Introduction
Spices have been extensively used in history as a component of daily diets of people from a wide variety of cultures and backgrounds. Spices are pungent or aromatic substances that are used for flavouring, colouring and preservation of food. Spices are all obtained from plants and can be fresh or dried seeds, kernels, bulbs, stalk, roots, bark, leave, pods or buds(1). As a part of daily diets, spices could be a source of supplementary nutrients in addition to those obtained from whole foods.
Spices such as ginger (Zingiber officinale), cinnamon (Cinnamomum verum), black seed (Nigella sativa), fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum), cardamom (Elettaria cardamomum), cloves (Syzygium aromaticum) and saffron (Crocus sativus) have been traditionally used particularly in the Indian subcontinent, Europe, Mediterranean and Arabian countries such as the United Arab Emirates (UAE)(2). These spices are used for food preparation as aromatic spices and condiments. Spices have been studied for functional purposes in the contexts of diabetes, asthma, hypertension, inflammation, cough, bronchitis, headache, eczema, fever, dizziness and influenza(3,4).
Even though spices are usually consumed in minute quantities, their contribution to the overall diet could be substantial if they were used more frequently. From a nutrition perspective, spices have significant roles in reducing lipids peroxidation during food processing and preparation, due to their inherent antioxidative activity. They also have antimicrobial activity, which is exploited by industrial food producers as natural preservatives(5).
Ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc.) belongs to the family Zingiberaceae and has been used in cooking and cultural medical practices for many years(6). In addition to its macronutrient composition, ginger contains many different micronutrients including vitamins and minerals such as vitamin C, calcium, phosphorous, zinc, and iron and its polyphenol (tannins and flavonoids) makes it a good source of antioxidants. Cinnamon is obtained from the inner bark of plants in the genus Cinnamomum and has also been used as an edible and medicinal spice for centuries(7). Such properties likely related to its vitamins and mineral content including potassium, copper, phosphate, zinc and iron as well as bioactive ingredients including cinnamaldehyde and cinnamic acid(8).
Fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum) is a legume seed belonging to the Fabaceae family and is widely produced and used in Mediterranean countries and Asia(9). Fenugreek is primarily composed of carbohydrates and protein and to a lesser extent fibre and fat. Saffron (Crocus sativus), a carotenoid-rich spice belongs to the Iridaceous family, has been widely investigated due to its hypoglycaemic, hypolipidaemic and antioxidant properties(3). Cardamom is a fibre-rich spice belonging to the Zingiberaceae family and is another commonly used spice that has been under extensive investigation in the last few years(10). Furthermore, the plant Nigella sativa L. has edible seeds known as black seeds which contain several nutrients including copper, phosphate, zinc, iron and volatile and fixed oils providing benefits on top of its macronutrient content. Black seeds have been widely used in traditional medicine practices, but recent evidence has suggested antimicrobial, anticancer and antioxidant actions(4). Although the studies on these spices are done with reference to many environmental and agricultural aspects, the studies of their biochemical constituents and mineral variations are rarely performed on market obtained samples. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the nutritional value of seven spices (ginger (Zingiber officinale), cinnamon (Cinnamomum verum), black seed (Nigella sativa), fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum), cardamom (Elettaria cardamomum), cloves (Syzygium aromaticum) and saffron (Crocus sativus)) from a common market in the UAE.
Materials and methods
Sample preparation
Seven commonly consumed spices were purchased from a local market (Alyahar Market) in Al Ain, UAE. The selected spices included, ginger (Zingiber officinale), cinnamon (Cinnamomum verum), black seed (Nigella sativa), fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum), cardamom (Elettaria cardamomum), cloves (Syzygium aromaticum) and saffron (Crocus sativus). Spices were purchased as a whole spice and were ground in the laboratory using a coffee and spice grinder machine (Moulinex Coffee Grinder, MC300161, France). Spice samples were prepared in triplicate for the proximate and micronutrient analyses.
Proximate analysis
The seven spices were analysed chemically according to the Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) procedure(11). Spices were analysed for their moisture, protein, fat, fibre and ash content according to the following procedures:
Moisture content determination
Moisture content of the seven spices were assessed by oven drying at 105°C for 2 h and placed in a desiccator to cool. One gram of each spice powder was weighed and spread uniformly in the aluminium dishes. A was used to dry the samples for a further 16 h at 105 ± 3°C which were then returned to the desiccator to cool down to room temperature. The equations used to calculate the percentage of total dry matter and total moisture are shown in Table 1(11).
Table 1.
Proximate analysis equations
| Component | Equation |
|---|---|
| % Total dry matter | ![]() |
| % Total moisture | 100 − % Total dry matter |
| % Ash | ![]() |
| % Protein | % Nitrogen × Protein factor (6.25) |
| % Crude fat | ![]() |
| % Carbohydrate | 100 − (% Total moisture + %Ash + %Protein + %Crude fat + % Total dietary fibre) |
Ash determination
Labelled ashing crucibles were placed in a Mommert forced air drying oven (Schutzart DIN 400-50-IP20) at 500°C for 4 h, then placed in the desiccator to cool to room temperature. One gram of the sample was weighed in the crucibles and placed in a muffle furnace oven (Carbolite ELM, 11/6) at 500°C for 4 h. The crucibles were then allowed to cool to less than 200 °C. The equation used to calculate the percentage of ash is given in Table 1.
Protein content determination
The Kjeldahl method was applied to evaluate the nitrogen content in the different spice samples. The equation used to calculate the percentage of protein is given in Table 1.
Fat determination
Fat content was determined using Soxhlet extraction as recommended by the AOAC(11). The equation used to determine percentage of crude fat is listed in Table 1(11).
Fibre content determination
The ANKOMTDF Dietary Fiber Analyzer (Dietary Fiber Analyzer, ANKOM, Macedon, NY, USA) was used to measure the fibre content of each spice, using the AOAC 991.43 TDF method(11).
Carbohydrate content determination
Carbohydrate content value was generated by the difference of the mean percentage values of moisture, ash, protein, lipids and dietary fibres shown in Table 1.
Energy calculation
The energy content of the spices samples was calculated according to Atwaters’ protocol(12), as this method has been used previously and is considered suitable for the calculation of the energy content of the spices(13). Energy content was calculated by the following equation:
Mineral content determination
The procedure for measuring minerals in spices by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometer (ICP-OES) was followed for the micronutrient analysis of the spices(14).
The CEM Mars 5 microwave digestion method (Mars5, CEM, Matthews, USA) was used for elements extraction from the spice samples. The digestion procedure was founded upon the USEPA 3015A guideline recommendations(14). This microwave digestion method was designed to simulate extraction using conventional heating with nitric acid and hydrochloric acid. The spice samples were prepared by placing 0⋅50 g of sample into the microwave digestion vessels, with 10 ml of concentrated nitric acid and 2 ml hydrochloric acid. The vessels were capped and placed in the microwave digestion system. After the digestion and cooling of the samples to room temperature, de-ionised water was added to the sample solution to reach 50 ml before being aspirated through a nebulizer. The resulting solution was transported to a plasma torch for excitation.
Element-specific emission spectra were produced by radiofrequency inductively coupled plasma. The spectra were detached by a grating spectrometer, and intensities of the line spectra were monitored at specific wavelengths by a charged coupled detector. A fitted background correction was used to correct the blank signal and matrix effect. Background correction was not required in case of line broadening where a background correction measurement would degrade the analytical result. Emission spectra for each element were recorded as follows: Ca – 317⋅93 nm, K – 766⋅51 nm, Mg – 285⋅21 nm, Na – 588⋅99 nm, P – 177⋅43 nm, S – 180⋅67 nm, Co – 238⋅89 nm, Cu – 324⋅75 nm, Fe – 259⋅94 nm, Mn – 257⋅61 and Zn – 213⋅86 nm. Spectral, physical and chemical interferences were avoided through use of ionisation buffers, intra-experimental validation of solutions and automated spectral resolution. The machine used for the analysis was an ICP-OES (710-ES, Varian, USA).
Statistical analysis
Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 23.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA) for windows was used for the analysis of the nutrient composition data. Kruskal–Wallis tests were used for comparison of measurements of macronutrients and micronutrients of the spices due to the lack of normality assumption of ANOVA. Statistical significances were considered with P < 0⋅05.
Results
Proximate analysis
Locally consumed spices were analysed chemically according to the AOAC. The proximate analysis data were expressed as mean and standard derivations (Table 2).
Table 2.
Proximate analysis of the seven spices (mean ± standard deviation)
| Ginger | Cinnamon | Black seed | Fenugreek | Cardamom | Clove | Saffron | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moisture (g/100 g) | 8⋅11 ± 0⋅26 | 8⋅24 ± 0⋅20 | 6⋅40 ± 0⋅13 | 7⋅33 ± 0⋅16 | 7⋅52 ± 0⋅09 | 7⋅86 ± 0⋅04 | 8⋅92 ± 0⋅19 |
| Protein (g/100 g) | 10⋅51 ± 0⋅26 | 3⋅50 ± 0⋅02 | 18⋅97 ± 0⋅13 | 24⋅99 ± 0⋅04 | 10⋅67 ± 0⋅08 | 6⋅96 ± 0⋅04 | 11⋅33 ± 0⋅05 |
| Fat (g/100 g) | 3⋅13 ± 0⋅20 | 0⋅55 ± 0⋅05 | 36⋅21 ± 0⋅11 | 4⋅36 ± 0⋅09 | 4⋅40 ± 0⋅27 | 5⋅04 ± 0⋅12 | 4⋅40 ± 0⋅07 |
| Ash (g/100 g) | 5⋅63 ± 0⋅04 | 4⋅60 ± 0⋅17 | 4⋅20 ± 0⋅05 | 0⋅02 ± 0⋅00 | 0⋅04 ± 0⋅00 | 5⋅68 ± 0⋅23 | 0⋅02 ± 0⋅00 |
| Fibre (g/100 g) | 3⋅01 ± 0⋅05 | 45⋅40 ± 0⋅89 | 20⋅67 ± 0⋅59 | 29⋅87 ± 0⋅78 | 30⋅13 ± 1⋅50 | 29⋅97 ± 1⋅99 | 12⋅23 ± 1⋅31 |
| Carbohydrate (g/100 g) | 69⋅61 ± 0⋅21 | 37⋅69 ± 0⋅49 | 13⋅55 ± 0⋅54 | 33⋅43 ± 0⋅61 | 47⋅23 ± 1⋅12 | 44⋅50 ± 1⋅81 | 63⋅10 ± 1⋅46 |
| Energy (kcal) | 348⋅65 ± 2⋅00 | 169⋅78 ± 2⋅36 | 455⋅98 ± 2⋅80 | 272⋅95 ± 2⋅99 | 271⋅20 ± 7⋅11 | 251⋅19 ± 7⋅23 | 337⋅32 ± 6⋅20 |
Data are expressed as g/100 g of whole dried spice powder.
Moisture content ranged from 6⋅40 g/100 g for black seed to 8⋅92 g/100 g for saffron. Moisture content is one of chief variables for assessing shelf life and our results showed lowest moisture content of black seed, suggesting increased shelf life when compared to other spices. Exposure of spices to a dry environment will result in reduced moisture content. However, they can absorb moisture again when exposed to humid environments, resulting in increased moisture content. The whole black seeds have low moisture content, but when ground, potentially absorb moisture from atmosphere and the water content increases, being greater than whole seeds, hence, moisture content increases with a greater surface area of the sample. Protein content was lowest in cinnamon at 3⋅50 g/100 g and highest in fenugreek at 24⋅99 g/100 g. Fat content was highest in black seed powder reaching 36⋅21 g/100 g, while it was lowest in cinnamon powder 0⋅05 g/100 g. Ash content varied from 0⋅02 g/100 g for fenugreek and saffron powder to 5⋅68 g/100 g for clove powder.
Cinnamon powder had the highest fibre level at 45⋅40 g/100 g, whereas ginger powder had the lowest level at 3⋅01 g/100 g. On the other hand, carbohydrate content ranged from 13⋅55 g/100 g for black seed powder to 69⋅61 g/100 g for ginger powder.
The moisture content of ginger was lower than earlier reports(15), but higher than what was reported by Adeyeye et al.(16). Fat (3⋅13 g/100 g) and ash (5⋅63 g/100 g) content were consistent with the previous studies, while fibre content (3⋅01 g/100 g) was significantly lower than previously reported(15,17). Conversely, protein and carbohydrate content reported by Ereifej et al.(17), Prakash et al.(15) and Adeyeye et al.(16) were lower than the present study findings. Protein content of cinnamon in our study was similar to that reported by Gul et al.(18). While ash content of the present study (4⋅6 g/100 g) was similar to the ash content that Ereifej et al.(17). In contrast, energy result reported by Gul et al.(18) was significantly higher than the energy results of the present study due to a higher fat content. Moisture, protein, fat and ash content of the black seed in the present study are in consistent with the findings of previous studies(19,20). Fibre content of the present study for black seed was higher than those reported previously, while carbohydrate content was lower than that reported in the literature(19,20).
Naidu et al.(21) reported a higher moisture content of fenugreek than the findings of the present study, while Al-Jasass et al.(22) and El Nasri et al.(23) reported similar moisture content to the present study findings. Protein content (24⋅9 g/100 g) was consistent with the study results of El Nasri et al.(23) and Naidu et al.(21) and higher than Al-Jasass et al.(22) Cardamom moisture and ash content results were lower than what was reported by Ereifej et al.(17), Pruthi et al.(24) and Singh et al.(25). While protein content of this study (10⋅67 g/100 g) was consistent with the results of Ereifej et al.(17) and Singh et al.(25), and higher than what Pruthi et al.(24). Ereifej et al.(17) reported a higher content of ash and fibre, while other studies(24,25) reported a lower fibre content and a higher ash content. Carbohydrate content was higher than what was reported in literature(23–25).
Earlier reports(16,22) confirmed a similar protein content for cloves when compared to the present study findings (6⋅96 g/100 g). Moisture content of cloves in previous studies varied from 7⋅44 g/100 g for Al-Jasass et al.(22) to 16⋅4 g/100 g for Ereifej et al.(17). Our result was on the lower limit (7⋅87 g/100 g) and was consistent with Al-Jasass et al. findings(22). Carbohydrate content of cloves (44⋅5 g/100 g) was lower than what previously reported(16,22). In contrast, Ereifej et al.(17) reported lower carbohydrate findings than the present study (31⋅3 g/100 g).
Saffron's moisture, fat and ash content (8⋅92 g/100 g, 4⋅4 g/100 g and 0⋅02 g/100 g, respectively) were lower than what Mohamadi et al., Srivastava et al. and Fahim et al. reported(26,27). Fibre and carbohydrate content (12⋅23 g/100 g and 63⋅1 g/100 g, respectively) were higher than what reported earlier by various researchers(26,27).
The differences in nutrient composition of the spices reported is speculated to be due to the different soil and geographical locations of the spice plants, and due to the difference in environmental conditions, which influences the nutrient composition(15,16). Moreover, different grinding and storing techniques have proved to have a major effect on the nutrient composition of the spices(28). As such, the nutrient content of five different sizes of ginger powder particles that were produced using a micronizer machine, showed that the protein content increased significantly when the size of ginger powder particles decreased(15). In an attempt to understand the differences in the nutrient composition between the spices with previous studies and the current research findings, it is believed that the superfine grinding of dried spices producing narrow and uniform particle size, increases the surface area and therefore increases the amount available for analysis(29). In the present study, dried whole spices were grinded using a coffee grinding machine, with large particle-sized powders. Grinders can have different intensity levels, different blades and different durations. Therefore, different particle sizes could be produced using different grinders, hence, different nutrient composition findings as well(29).
Micronutrients composition analysis
Major elements
Results of the chemical analysis of the spices showed that these spices contain major elements in significant amount. As such, cinnamon had the highest calcium content (1414⋅82 mg/100 g and 141 %/100 g of RDA), while ginger had the lowest calcium content (125⋅21 mg/100 g and 12⋅5 %/100 g of RDA) (Table 3). Potassium content ranged from 460⋅78 mg/100 g (9⋅8 %/100 g of RDA) for cinnamon to 1125⋅91 mg/100 g (23⋅6 %/100 g of RDA) for saffron. Magnesium content ranged from 42⋅42 mg/100 g (10⋅1 %/100 g of RDA) for cinnamon to 375⋅71 mg/100 g (89⋅5 %/100 g of RDA) for cloves. On the other hand, sodium content was the lowest in cinnamon, cloves and saffron. Phosphorous ranged from 45⋅81 mg/100 g (6⋅5 %/100 g of RDA) for cinnamon to 675⋅52 mg/100 g (96⋅5 %/100 g of RDA) for ginger. Sulphur content did not exceed 310⋅58 mg/100 g (no established RDA) (black seed) in any of the analysed spices.
Table 3.
Major elements composition of the spices (mean ± standard deviation)
| Spice | Ca (mg/100 g) | K (mg/100 g) | Mg (mg/100 g) | Na (mg/100 g) | P (mg/100 g) | S (mg/100 g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ginger | 125⋅21 ± 0⋅12 | 1071⋅13 ± 40⋅05 | 271⋅35 ± 2⋅3⋅00 | 69⋅80 ± 0⋅15 | 675⋅52 ± 4⋅84 | 176⋅40 ± 1⋅36 |
| Cinnamon | 1414⋅82 ± 8⋅11 | 460⋅78 ± 26⋅68 | 42⋅42 ± 0⋅15 | 1⋅74 ± 0⋅01 | 45⋅81 ± 0⋅53 | 76⋅13 ± 0⋅16 |
| Black seed | 578⋅24 ± 10⋅03 | 633⋅3 ± 54⋅60 | 263⋅60 ± 2⋅81 | 23⋅62 ± 0⋅35 | 649⋅15 ± 8⋅61 | 310⋅58 ± 4⋅84 |
| Fenugreek | 203⋅74 ± 2⋅95 | 853⋅95 ± 89⋅86 | 139⋅68 ± 2⋅95 | 35⋅13 ± 0⋅74 | 399⋅26 ± 6⋅68 | 237⋅91 ± 3⋅80 |
| Cardamom | 619⋅71 ± 20⋅55 | 873⋅30 ± 24⋅91 | 266⋅60 ± 12⋅41 | 316⋅79 ± 14⋅74 | 84⋅83 ± 4⋅12 | 130⋅54 ± 6⋅61 |
| Clove | 354⋅58 ± 3⋅50 | 1485⋅28 ± 72⋅12 | 375⋅71 ± 3⋅33 | 2⋅26 ± 0⋅01 | 125⋅84 ± 0⋅81 | 91⋅72 ± 0⋅15 |
| Saffron | 175⋅85 ± 2⋅85 | 1125⋅91 ± 13⋅62 | 222⋅32 ± 3⋅38 | 8⋅82 ± 0⋅18 | 391⋅83 ± 5⋅97 | 237⋅39 ± 3⋅63 |
Ca, calcium; K, potassium; Mg, magnesium; Na, sodium; P, phosphorous; S, sulphur.
Data are expressed as mg/100 g of whole dried spice powder.
Trace elements
Cobalt, copper, iron, manganese and zinc are trace minerals that play a major role in metabolism. The seven chosen spices were assessed for their trace mineral content in the current research study (Table 4). Trace minerals were found in smaller amount when compared to major minerals as shown in Table 3. None of the trace minerals exceeded 640 mg/100 g. Moreover, cobalt level was the highest in ginger while copper was the highest in black seed. Iron levels ranged from 624⋅77 mg/100 g (>7800 %/100 g of RDA for males and >3400 %/100 g of RDA for females) for saffron to 90⋅24 mg/100 g (1128 %/100 g RDA for males and 501⋅3 %/100 g of RDA for females) for cinnamon powder. Manganese content was the highest in clove powder (360⋅85 mg/100 g, 12 800–20 000 %/100 g of RDA [male–female]) and the lowest in fenugreek (23⋅90 mg/100 g, 1039–1327⋅8 %/100 g of RDA [male–female]), while zinc content did not exceed 56⋅24 mg/100 g (black seed powder) (511⋅3–703 %/100 g of RDA [male–female]) in any of the spice powders.
Table 4.
Trace elements composition of the spices (mean ± standard deviation)
| Spice | Co (mg/100 g) | Cu (mg/100 g) | Fe (mg/100 g) | Mn (mg/100 g) | Zn (mg/100 g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ginger | 4⋅52 ± 0⋅09 | 0⋅28 ± 0⋅01 | 149⋅05 ± 1⋅15 | 230⋅65 ± 0⋅05 | 14⋅17 ± 0⋅15 |
| Cinnamon | 0⋅28 ± 0⋅10 | 2⋅70 ± 0⋅03 | 90⋅24 ± 0⋅36 | 171⋅52 ± 2⋅37 | 12⋅36 ± 0⋅10 |
| Black seed | 0⋅25 ± 0⋅01 | 16⋅52 ± 0⋅18 | 110⋅87 ± 1⋅11 | 30⋅64 ± 0⋅31 | 56⋅24 ± 0⋅78 |
| Fenugreek | 1⋅03 ± 0⋅06 | 9⋅28 ± 0⋅12 | 343⋅81 ± 2⋅60 | 23⋅90 ± 0⋅19 | 34⋅29 ± 1⋅00 |
| Cardamom | 0⋅52 ± 0⋅02 | 5⋅20 ± 0⋅07 | 421⋅37 ± 12⋅63 | 182⋅66 ± 5⋅46 | 12⋅98 ± 0⋅82 |
| Clove | 0⋅25 ± 0⋅06 | 7⋅06 ± 0⋅08 | 114⋅54 ± 0⋅89 | 360⋅85 ± 4⋅19 | 46⋅70 ± 0⋅62 |
| Saffron | 0⋅76 ± 0⋅02 | 9⋅85 ± 0⋅09 | 624⋅77 ± 7⋅43 | 32⋅05 ± 0⋅45 | 43⋅58 ± 1⋅33 |
Data are expressed as mg/100 g.
Co, cobalt; Cu, copper; Fe, iron; Mn, manganese; Zn, zinc.
Discussion
The results of the present study were not in agreement with earlier studies(30,31), which reported different mineral contents in ginger powder. In addition, the study of Prakash et al.(15) showed that ginger powder contained 9⋅41 mg/100 g iron, 104⋅02 mg/100 g calcium and 204⋅02 mg/100 g phosphorous, of which calcium content was in accord to the present study.
An earlier study published by Gopalan et al.(32) noted that spices have the following amounts of calcium, phosphorous and iron (mg/100 g) respectively: cardamom (229, 130 and 160), dried clove (740, 100 and 11⋅7), fenugreek (160, 370 and 6⋅5) and fresh ginger (20, 60 and 3⋅5). Chinese cinnamon was found to have the highest calcium content among the other identified elements, (Ca: 1157⋅36 mg/100 g, Mg: 74⋅89 mg/100 g and P: 66⋅31 mg/100 g, respectively); none of the minerals results of our study were consistent with these findings(33). In a study by Khan et al., it was reported that the manganese content for cinnamon, cardamom and cloves to be 879⋅8, 758⋅1 and 649⋅9 μg/g, respectively(34), which are not in agreement to our findings.
Additionally, Maghrabi et al.(35) analysed the commonly used spices in Saudi Arabia, including fenugreek and black seed and the results were not in agreement with our findings. On the other hand, Al-Jassir et al.(36) indicated that potassium, phosphorus, sodium and iron levels to be the major elements present in black seed powder. While zinc, calcium, magnesium, manganese and copper were found at minor amounts. However, lead, cadmium and arsenic were not detected in the seeds as the study results are not consistent with the present study.
Mineral analysis of black seed reported by Cheikh-Rouhou et al.(20) are in accordance with the present study in term of calcium and sodium content (5⋅75 mg/100 g and 20⋅4 mg/100 g, respectively), while the other mineral content values vary widely.
The mineral composition analysis of clove by earlier studies(16,22) were not in agreement with the current findings. Adeyeye et al. reported remarkably higher levels of phosphorous, calcium and sodium (546 mg/100 g, 400 mg/100 g and 60 mg/100 g, respectively)(16), while Al-Jasass et al. reported lower mineral content of clove powder in all minerals possibly due to the usage of different analytical techniques(22). In regards to fenugreek, lower levels of all minerals content were reported by Al-Jasass et al.(22), and higher levels reported by Naidu et al.(21) when compared to the present study. Saffron, widely used in Iranian dishes, is a good source of potassium, magnesium, sodium, calcium, zinc, iron, copper and manganese(37). Mineral levels fluctuate with species, and the difference in mineral content may increase due to the different analytical methods used, as well as this might be owing to the differences in the spice's origins(38).
The differences in macronutrient composition of each of the spices reported are attributed to the different soil and geographical locations of the source of planting and growing plants, and due to the difference in environmental conditions, which influences the nutrient composition(39–41). Different grinding and storing techniques have proven to have a major effect on the spice's nutrient composition(42). Additionally, mineral levels fluctuate within species, as well as the analytical methods used for analysis. There is a general scarcity of literature that deals with these types of internal composition of spices, hence comparison between similar spices were difficult. Therefore, further studies are required to determine the nutrient content of sugar in the spices.
Conclusions
Ginger, cinnamon, black seed, fenugreek, cardamom, clove and saffron were analysed in this study. Findings show that these spices have different micronutrient, macronutrient, mineral and lipid content. While each of these spices provides aroma and improves the taste of food, they are interestingly comprised of a wide range of diverse and valuable nutrients. Considering their well-documented medicinal properties and nutritional components, these spices or their active compounds could be commercially exploited for its application in therapeutic drugs or nutritional supplements providing health benefits. Keeping in view the potential of these edible spices, considerable efforts should be taken to encourage researchers to explore and develop necessary strategies for future preclinical and clinical research on these promising therapeutic leads.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Tawfiq Al Zubaidi, Antonios Zampelas, Ina Bergheim, Amjad Jarrar, Usama Soka, Fatima Almeqbaali and to the laboratory personnel and for the Library Research Desk for providing their knowledge, experience and the relevant reference material.
This research was undertaken without a research grant.
Conceptualisation: A. A. D.; Formal analysis: D. A.; Funding acquisition: A. A. D.; Investigation: D. A.; Methodology: D. A.; Project administration: A. A. D.; Supervision: A. A. D.; Validation: A. A. D.; Writing – original draft: D. A. and J. F.; Writing – review & editing: A. A. D., A. J., M. N. M. T., J. F., V. A., T. O., M. M., L. I. and L. S.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Jiang TA (2019) Health benefits of culinary herbs and spices. J AOAC Int 102, 395–411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Azimi P, Ghiasvand R, Feizi A, et al. (2016) Effect of cinnamon, cardamom, saffron and ginger consumption on blood pressure and a marker of endothelial function in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Blood Pressure 25, 133–140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Fernández-Albarral JA, de Hoz R, Ramírez AI, et al. (2020) Beneficial effects of saffron (Crocus sativus L.) in ocular pathologies, particularly neurodegenerative retinal diseases. Neural Regen Res 15, 1408–1416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hossain MS, Sharfaraz A, Dutta A, et al. (2021) A review of ethnobotany, phytochemistry, antimicrobial pharmacology and toxicology of Nigella sativa L. Biomed Pharmacother 143, 112182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Jessica Elizabeth DLT, Gassara F, Kouassi AP, et al. (2017) Spice use in food: properties and benefits. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 57, 1078–1088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Shahrajabian MH, Sun W & Cheng Q (2019) Clinical aspects and health benefits of ginger (Zingiber officinale) in both traditional Chinese medicine and modern industry. Acta Agric Scand Sec B Soil Plant Sci 69, 546–556. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Singletary KJ (2019) Cinnamon: update of potential health benefits. Nutr Today 54, 42–52. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ribeiro-Santos R, Andrade M, Madella D, et al. (2017) Revisiting an ancient spice with medicinal purposes: cinnamon. Trends Food Sci Technol 62, 154–169. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Fatima T, Maqbool K & Hussain SZ (2018) Potential health benefits of fenugreek. J Med Plants Stud 6, 166–169. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ashokkumar K, Murugan M, Dhanya MK, et al. (2020) Botany, traditional uses, phytochemistry and biological activities of cardamom [Elettaria cardamomum (L.) Maton] – a critical review. J Ethnopharmacol 246, 112244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.AOAC & Horwitz W (2003) Official Methods of Analysis of the AOAC International. Washington, DC: Association of Official Analytical Chemists. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Merrill AL & Watt BK (1955) Energy Value of Foods: Basis and Derivation. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wijekoon JOM, Karim A & Bhat R (2011) Evaluation of nutritional quality of torch ginger (Etlingera elatior Jack.) inflorescence. Int Food Res J 18, 1415. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Swami K, Judd CD, Orsini J, et al. (2001) Microwave assisted digestion of atmospheric aerosol samples followed by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry determination of trace elements. Fresenius’ J Anal Chem 369, 63–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Pilerood SA & Prakash J (2010) Chemical composition and antioxidant properties of ginger root (Zingiber officinale). J Med Plants Res 4, 2674–2679. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Adeyeyea E & Fagbohunb E (2005) Proximate, mineral and phytate profiles of some selected spices found in Nigeria. Biol Sci-PJSIR 48, 14–22. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ereifej KI, Feng H, Rababah TM, et al. (2015) Microbiological status and nutritional composition of spices used in food preparation. Food Nutr Sci 6, 1134. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Gul S & Safdar M (2009) Proximate composition and mineral analysis of cinnamon. Pak J Nutr 8, 1456–1460. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Nergiz C & Ötleş S (1993) Chemical composition of Nigella sativa L. Seeds. Food Chem 48, 259–261. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Cheikh-Rouhou S, Besbes S, Hentati B, et al. (2007) Nigella sativa L.: chemical composition and physicochemical characteristics of lipid fraction. Food Chem 101, 673–681. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Madhava Naidu M, Shyamala BN, Pura Naik J, et al. (2011) Chemical composition and antioxidant activity of the husk and endosperm of fenugreek seeds. LWT - Food Sci Technol 44, 451–456. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Al-Jasass FM & Al-Jasser MS (2012) Chemical composition and fatty acid content of some spices and herbs under Saudi Arabia conditions. Sci World J 2012, 859892. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.El Nasri NA & El Tinay AH (2007) Functional properties of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum graecum) protein concentrate. Food Chem 103, 582–589. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Pruthi JS (1993) Major spices of India: crop management and post-harvest technology. In Major Spices of India: Crop Management and Post-Harvest Technology. New Delhi: Indian Council of Agricultural Research. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Singh G, Maurya S, deLampasona MP, et al. (2007) A comparison of chemical, antioxidant and antimicrobial studies of cinnamon leaf and bark volatile oils, oleoresins and their constituents. Food Chem Toxicol 45, 1650–1661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Mohamadi Sani A, Hemmati Kakhki A & Moradi E (2013) Chemical composition and nutritional value of saffron's pollen (Crocus sativus L.). Nutr Food Sci 43, 490–495. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Fahim NK, Janati S & Feizy J (2012) Chemical composition of agriproduct saffron (Crocus sativus L.) petals and its considerations as animal feed. GIAD J Food 37, 197–201. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Nasir M, Sidhu JS & Sogi DS (2022) Processing and nutritional profile of mung bean, black gram, pigeon pea, lupin, moth bean, and Indian vetch. In Dry Beans and Pulses, pp. 431–452 [M Siddiq & MA Uebersax, editors]. John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Zhao X, Yang Z, Gai G, et al. (2009) Effect of superfine grinding on properties of ginger powder. J Food Eng 91, 217–222. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Okwu D (2001) Evaluation of chemical composition of indigenous species and flavouring agents. Glob J Pure Appl Sci 7, 455–460. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ogbuewu I, Jiwuba P, Ezeokeke C, et al. (2014) Evaluation of phytochemical and nutritional composition of ginger rhizome powder. Int J Agric Rural Dev 17, 1663–1670. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Gopalan C, Rama Sastri B & Balasubramanian S (1980) Nutrition Value of Indian Foods. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Al-Numair KS, Ahmad D, Ahmed S, et al. (2007) Nutritive value, levels of polyphenols and anti-nutritional factors in Sri Lankan cinnamon (Cinnamomum zeyalnicum) and Chinese cinnamon (Cinnamomum cassia). Food Sci Agric Res 154, 5–21. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Khan N, Choi JY, Nho EY, et al. (2014) Determination of minor and trace elements in aromatic spices by micro-wave assisted digestion and inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry. Food Chem 158, 200–206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Maghrabi IA (2014) Determination of some mineral and heavy metals in Saudi Arabia popular herbal drugs using modern techniques. Afr J Pharm Pharmacol 8, 893–898. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Al-Jassir MS (1992) Chemical composition and microflora of black cumin (Nigella sativa L.) seeds growing in Saudi Arabia. Food Chem 45, 239–242. [Google Scholar]
- 37.De AK & De M (2022) Chapter 28 – Functional and therapeutic applications of some general and rare spices. In Functional Foods and Nutraceuticals in Metabolic and Non-Communicable Diseases, pp. 411–420 [Singh RB, Watanabe S, and Isaza AA, editors]. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Ibourki M, Ait Bouzid H, Bijla L, et al. (2022) Mineral profiling of twenty wild and cultivated aromatic and medicinal plants growing in Morocco. Biol Trace Elem Res 200, 4880–4889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Vilkickyte G & Raudone L (2021) Vaccinium vitis-idaea L. fruits: chromatographic analysis of seasonal and geographical variation in bioactive compounds. Foods 10, 2243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Woziwoda B, Dyderski MK, Parzych A, et al. (2021) Loss in macronutrient pools in bilberry and lingonberry in mesic Scots pine forests after Northern red oak introduction. Eur J Forest Res 140, 1499–1514. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Victorino ÍMM, Voyron S, Caser M, et al. (2021) Metabarcoding of soil fungal communities associated with alpine field-grown saffron (Crocus sativus L.) inoculated with AM fungi. J Fungi 7, 45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Aradwad PP, TV AK, Sahoo PK, et al. (2021) Key issues and challenges in spice grinding. Cleaner Eng Technol 5, 100347. [Google Scholar]



