Skip to main content
. 1999 Jan;73(1):767–771. doi: 10.1128/jvi.73.1.767-771.1999

TABLE 1.

In vivo spontaneous reactivationa

Virus or P value comparison No. of virus-positive rabbits/total no. of rabbits (%) or P value No. of virus-positive eyes/total no. of eyes (%) or P value No. of virus-positive eye swabs/total no. of eye swabsb (%) or P value
Viruses
 17syn+ 6/8 (75) 11/15 (73) 35/297 (11.8)
 17ΔSty 3/13 (23) 4/25 (16) 11/492 (2.2)
 17ΔSty-Res 7/10 (70) 13/19 (64) 38/377 (10.1)
P value comparisonc
 17ΔSty vs 17syn+ 0.03 0.0005 <0.0001
 17ΔSty vs 17ΔSty-Res 0.04 0.0006 <0.0001
 17syn+ vs 17ΔSty-Res 1.0  1.0    0.53  
Virusesd
 McKrae 25/30 (83) 44/60 (73) 183/1,570 (11.7)
dLAT371 5/6 (83) 9/12 (75) 38/290 (13.1)
dLAT2903 13/28 (46) 15/56 (27) 37/1,516 (2.4)
P value comparisonc
 17syn+ vs McKrae 0.62 1.0      0.42  
 17ΔSty vs dLAT371 0.04 0.0008 <0.0001
 17ΔSty vs dLAT2903 0.19 0.40     0.93  
a

Rabbits were infected with 2 × 105 PFU of the indicated virus per eye. Tears (eye swabs) were collected daily from latently infected rabbits from day 20 to 39 p.i. Spontaneous reactivation was monitored by culturing tears for the presence of infectious HSV-1 as described previously (7). 

b

The total numbers of cultures are slightly less than the numbers of eyes times 20 days, because occasional cultures were lost due to contamination. 

c

Two-sided Fisher exact test or chi-square test if the numbers were too large for the Fisher exact test. Analyses were done with the personal computer program Instat. A P of <0.05 was considered significant. 

d

Data reproduced from a previous publication (19).