Skip to main content
. 1999 Jan;73(1):767–771. doi: 10.1128/jvi.73.1.767-771.1999

TABLE 2.

In vivo epinephrine-induced ocular reactivation in latently infected rabbitsa

Virus or P value comparison No. of virus-positive rabbitsb/total no. of rabbits (%) or P value No. of virus-positive eyes/total no. of eyes (%) or P value No. of virus-positive eye swabs/total no. of eye swabs (%) or P value
Viruses
 McKrae 4/7 (57) 7/14 (50) 23/98 (24)
dLAT371 7/7 (100) 9/14 (64) 20/98 (20)
dLAT2903 4/16 (25) 4/32 (13) 8/192 (4)
P value comparisonsc
dLAT371 vs McKrae 0.19  0.70     0.73  
dLAT371 vs dLAT2903 0.001 0.0008 <0.0001
dLAT2903 vs McKrae 0.18  0.01   <0.0001
Virusesc
 17syn+ 7/11 (64) 12/22 (55) 48/154 (31)
 17ΔSty 2/9 (22) 2/18 (11) 4/126 (3)
 17ΔSty-Res 5/8 (63) 10/16 (63) 35/112 (31)
P value comparisons
 McKrae vs 17syn+ 1.0   1.0      0.2   
dLAT371 vs 17ΔSty 0.003 0.003  <0.0001
dLAT2903 vs 17ΔSty 1.0   1.0      0.77  
 17ΔSty-Res vs 17syn+ 1.0   0.74    1.0   
a

Rabbits were infected with 2 × 105 PFU of the indicated virus per eye and subjected to epinephrine iontophoresis approximately 30 days p.i., and in vivo-induced reactivation was monitored by culturing tears daily for 7 consecutive days, as described previously (7). Data presentation and statistical analyses are as described for Table 1

b

Number of rabbits in each group that had at least one virus-positive tear culture within 7 days of induction. 

c

Data reproduced from a previous publication (7).