TABLE 2.

Comparison of Skill Scores Between Subpar and High-Performance Teams

Assessment, M (IQR)	Subpar Performance (n = 10)	High Performance (n = 39)	p	Correlation effect Size	p
Primary survey	3.5 (3.0–4.0)	4.0 (3.5–4.5)	0.004	0.436	0.002
Injury recognition	4.0 (3.5–4.5)	5.0 (5.0–5.0)	0.035	0.386	0.006
Exposure	3.0 (2.0–4.0)	5.0 (4.0–5.0)	0.006	0.419	0.002
Adherence to CPG	3.0 (3.0–3.0)	4.0 (3.5–4.5)	0.016	0.369	0.009
Medical device use	4.0 (4.0–4.0)	5.0 (4.0–5.0)	0.016	0.377	0.008

The table shows the comparison of skill scores between subpar and high-performance teams, where the scores are significantly higher in high-performance teams for all the skills assessed in the table. Each skill was assessed on a scale of 1–5, where 1 is inappropriate performance, 3 is partial performance, and 5 is expected performance. The correlation coefficients indicate moderate to strong statistically significant correlations.