Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 12;109(5):1330–1341. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000370

Table 2.

Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses for predicting HER2 score 3+.

Univariable analysis Multivariable model
Variable OR 95% CI P OR 95% CI P
Age (per 1-year increase) 1.01 1.00–1.02 0.015 1.00 0.99–1.01 0.696
Female (vs. male) 0.70 0.54–0.91 0.008 0.86 0.65–1.13 0.265
Primary tumor location (vs. GEJ cancer) 0.68 0.55–0.84 <0.001 0.84 0.67–1.06 0.147
Histological differentiation (vs. well) <0.001 <0.001
 Moderate 1.26 0.74–2.16 0.391 1.18 0.69–2.03 0.543
 Poor 0.31 0.19–0.53 <0.001 0.27 0.16–0.47 <0.001
Tumor size (per 1 cm increase) 0.99 0.95–1.03 0.716
Perineural invasion (vs. absent) 0.91 0.72–1.15 0.442
Lymphovascular invasion (vs. absent) 1.07 0.86–1.33 0.523
Examined lymph nodes (vs. ≥16) 0.70 0.43–1.16 0.163
T stage (vs. T1) 0.019 0.164
 T2 1.66 0.73–3.80 0.226 1.40 0.60–3.28 0.439
 T3 1.29 0.59–2.82 0.529 0.97 0.43–2.19 0.934
 T4 1.01 0.47–2.21 0.972 0.92 0.41–2.06 0.844
N stage (vs. N0) 0.169 <0.001
 N1 1.37 0.97–1.96 0.078 1.38 0.95–1.99 0.088
 N2 1.16 0.83–1.64 0.389 1.37 0.95–1.96 0.088
 N3 1.37 1.01–1.88 0.047 2.11 1.51–2.95 <0.001

GEJ, gastroesophageal junction; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; OR, odds ratio.