Skip to main content
. 2023 May 3;109(7):1863–1870. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000331

TABLE 2.

False-negative rate of TAD for patients receiving TAD and ALND differentiating with initially cN1 and cN2/3 patients.

Variables Including cN2 or cN3, n/N (%) 95% CI Excluding cN2 or cN3, n/N (%) 95% CI
Adoption of IHC
 Yes 10/82 (12.2) 6.0–21.3 4/67 (6.0) 1.7–14.6
 No 11/82 (13.4) 6.9–22.7 4/67 (6.0) 1.7–14.6
No. TANa identified
 1 2/10 (20.0) 2.5–55.6 1/9 (11.1) 0.3–48.2
 2 1/18 (5.6) 0.1–27.3 0/13 (0) 0.0–24.7
 >2 7/54 (13.0) 5.4–24.9 3/45 (6.7) 1.4–18.3
Time period
 2014–2016 7/45 (15.6) 6.5–29.5 4/35 (11.4) 3.2–26.7
 2017–2021 3/37 (8.1) 1.7–21.9 0/32 (0) 0.0–10.9
Clinical T stage
 T1–T2 7/60 (11.7) 4.8–22.6 4/53 (7.5) 2.1–18.2
 T3–T4 3/22 (13.6) 2.9–34.9 0/14 (0) 0.0–23.2
SLN mapping agent used
 Single 7/57 (12.3) 5.1–23.7 3/48 (6.3) 1.3–17.2
 Dual 3/25 (12.0) 2.5–31.2 1/19 (5.3) 0.1–26.0
Detection of clipped node
 Mammography 5/42 (11.9) 4.0–25.6 3/33 (9.1) 1.9–24.3
 Ultrasound 2/34 (5.9) 0.7–19.7 0/30 (0) 0.0–11.6
 Not detected 3/6 (50.0) 11.8–88.2 1/4 (25.0) 0.6–80.6
a

including clipped lymph nodes or sentinel lymph nodes.

ALND, axillary lymph node dissection; IHC, immunohistochemistry; SLN, sentinel lymph node; TAD, targeted axillary dissection; TAN, targeted axillary node.