Table 2.
Effects of rating estimates and certainty on choice consistency, response time, and confidence
| MFX coefficients | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Consistency | log(RT) | Confidence | |
| pleasure of chosen (Pc) | 0.58 (p < 0.001) | −0.44 (p < 0.001) | 0.40 (p < 0.001) |
| pleasure of rejected (Pr) | −0.52 (p < 0.001) | 0.18 (p < 0.001) | −0.14 (p < 0.001) |
| nutrition of chosen (Nc) | 0.09 (p < 0.001) | −0.11 (p < 0.001) | 0.07 (p < 0.001) |
| nutrition of rejected (Nr) | −0.11 (p < 0.001) | 0.06 (p = 0.005) | −0.02 (p = 0.038) |
| pleasure certainty of chosen (PCc) | 0 (p = 0.985) | −0.03 (p = 0.479) | 0.11 (p < 0.001) |
| pleasure certainty of rejected (PCr) | −0.04 (p = 0.157) | 0.01 (p = 0.679) | 0.04 (p = 0.022) |
| nutrition certainty of chosen (NCc) | −0.03 (p = 0.411) | −0.06 (p = 0.076) | 0.04 (p = 0.014) |
| nutrition certainty of rejected (NCr) | −0.05 (p = 0.117) | 0.01 (p = 0.673) | 0.03 (p = 0.076) |
| R2 = 0.16 | R2 = 0.56 | R2 = 0.48 | |
Table shows the mixed-effects regression coefficients from three separate regressions using either choice consistency, response time, or confidence as the dependent variable. All regressions included random intercepts and slopes for each variable by participant