TABLE 1.
Published | Author | Drugs | Years | Region | Findings |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1991 | Kaitin et al18 | 218 | 1978-1989 | United States | 15% rated “1A” (important therapeutic gain) by FDA |
2002 | Prescrire 19 | 2,100 | 1987-2001 | France | 3% “bravo” (0.3%) or “real advance” (2.8%) |
2005 | Morgan et al20 | 1,147 | 1990-2003 | Canada | 6% offered “substantial improvement” or were the first effective drug |
2006 | Motola et al21 | 176 | 1995-2004 | Europe | 31% offered “major benefit” |
2010 | van Luijn et al22 | 122 | 1995-2005 | Europe | 10% had evidence of statistically significant superiority |
2012 | Prescrire23 | 994 | 2002-2011 | France | 2% “bravo” (0.2%) or “real advance” (1.5%) |
2018 | Lexchin24 | 509 | 1995-2016 | Canada | 11% were therapeutically innovative |
2019 | Wieseler et al25 | 216 | 2011-2017 | Germany | 26% offered “major” (0.5%) or “considerable” (25.5%) added benefit |
2019 | Rodwin26 | 680a | 2009-2016 | France | 5% offered “major” (1.6%) or “important” (3.9%) improvement |
2021 | DiStefano et al27 | 122 | 2018b | United States | 15%-27% offered more than low added therapeutic benefit |
a Estimate based on disclosed average of 85.7 drugs per year.
b DiStefano et al identified 122 “ultra-expensive” drugs based on Medicare Part D spending in 2018.
FDA = US Food and Drug Administration.