Skip to main content
. 2021 May;27(5):10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.5.685. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.5.685

TABLE 1.

Published Reports Evaluating Incremental Benefit of New Drugs

Published Author Drugs Years Region Findings
1991 Kaitin et al18 218 1978-1989 United States 15% rated “1A” (important therapeutic gain) by FDA
2002 Prescrire 19 2,100 1987-2001 France 3% “bravo” (0.3%) or “real advance” (2.8%)
2005 Morgan et al20 1,147 1990-2003 Canada 6% offered “substantial improvement” or were the first effective drug
2006 Motola et al21 176 1995-2004 Europe 31% offered “major benefit”
2010 van Luijn et al22 122 1995-2005 Europe 10% had evidence of statistically significant superiority
2012 Prescrire23 994 2002-2011 France 2% “bravo” (0.2%) or “real advance” (1.5%)
2018 Lexchin24 509 1995-2016 Canada 11% were therapeutically innovative
2019 Wieseler et al25 216 2011-2017 Germany 26% offered “major” (0.5%) or “considerable” (25.5%) added benefit
2019 Rodwin26 680a 2009-2016 France 5% offered “major” (1.6%) or “important” (3.9%) improvement
2021 DiStefano et al27 122 2018b United States 15%-27% offered more than low added therapeutic benefit

a Estimate based on disclosed average of 85.7 drugs per year.

b DiStefano et al identified 122 “ultra-expensive” drugs based on Medicare Part D spending in 2018.

FDA = US Food and Drug Administration.