Required for market entry
|
Information security |
|
Usability |
Is there a level of health/digital literacy that is required to receive benefit from the DTx?
Does the DTx operate as intended? For example, do all components of the software function as designed?
|
Required for evaluation of value
|
Clinical effectiveness |
Premarket: Must demonstrate safety and efficacy using standard endpoints prior to market authorization by regulatory authority
What effect does the DTx have on clinically accepted, standard endpoints for the disease based on a measurable set of data?
What is a clinically meaningful benefit/result?
How do outcomes in the real world compare with those used for regulatory approval?
What is the effect on patient satisfaction and quality of life?
-
What level of evidence (e.g., RCT) is appropriate?
|
Engagement (adherence) |
Do patients use the DTx as intended in the real world?
What “dosage” (level of sustained use over time) is required to achieve desired outcomes?
-
Patient acceptance of the user interface/satisfaction of using the therapeutic
Potential for product updates to alter the user interface and affect engagement
|
Safety |
What are the adverse events in clinical trials?
What are the adverse events in real-world use?
How do adverse events compare to standard of care?
-
What is the potential for harm?
|
Comparative effectiveness |
How does the DTx compare with other available treatments for the condition?
The level of rigor required will depend on the potential for harm, availability of other therapies, and whether the DTx is considered an adjunct or a replacement (i.e., a standalone treatment)
|
Cost impact |
|
Data access |
|
Ongoing evaluations |
|