Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Stat Med. 2016 Feb 16;35(16):2831–2844. doi: 10.1002/sim.6900

Table 2:

Empirical size and power (%) of testing ΔSGY.Q1: model with only main effects; Q2: model with main effects and microRNA-by-expression interaction; Q3: model with main effects and two-way interactions; Q4: model with main effects, two-way and three-way interactions; Omnibus: the omnibus test for Q1-Q4; Score test: the classic score test for βs. The tuning parameter λ was chosen using GCV.

Null Alternative
βS 0 0.2 0 0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0 0
βM 0 0 0.2 0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0 0
βG 0 0 0 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.1 0.1 0 0
βMG 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.3 0.5 0 0
βSM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.3 0.5 0 0
βSG 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.3 0.5 0 0
βSMG 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0.8
Q1 4.70 4.40 4.65 90.2 56.2 88.5 98.8 6.30 3.35 7.55 11.3
Q2 5.85 4.95 4.90 82.5 44.3 81.1 97.0 9.60 8.45 9.60 13.4
Q3 5.00 5.20 5.00 73.5 36.8 72.8 94.1 60.5 93.5 10.9 20.7
Q4 5.10 4.90 4.60 66.9 31.6 66.7 91.5 53.3 88.7 63.8 88.7
Omnibus 5.35 4.70 4.80 84.1 47.2 82.8 97.6 45.8 85.1 45.2 78.5
Score test 45.3 45.0 48.3