Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 1;2023(8):CD007315. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007315.pub3
Study ID Intervention(s) and comparator(s) Participants included in analysis
(N) Deaths
(N) Deaths
(% of participants) Participants with at least one adverse event
(N) Participants with at least one adverse event
(%) Participants with infection
(N) Participants with infection
(%)
Duncan 2018 I: hyperinsulinaemic normoglycaemia 226* 2* 0.9* 9* 4* 9* 4*
C: standard therapy 249* 6* 2.4* 17* 6.8* 17* 6.8*
Wallia 2017 I: intensive (140) 23* 4* 17.4* 11* 47.8* 10* 43.5*
C: moderate (180) 26* 1* 3.8* 16* 61.5* 16* 61.5*
Wahby 2016 I: tight glycaemic control 67 2 2.99 28 41.8 27 40.3
C: conventional moderate glycaemic control 68 4 5.88 45 66.2 51 94
Parekh 2016 I: moderately intense control 30 0 0 13 43.3 1 3.3
C: standard glucose control 30 2 6.66 22 73.3 1 3.3
Yuan 2015 I: intensive glycaemic (IG) management 106 1 0.94 7 6.6 21 19.8
C: conventional glycaemic (CG) management 106 1 0.94 14 13.2 32 30.2
Umpierrez 2015 I: intensive group 77* 38* 49* 30* 39* 4* 5.2*
C: conservative control 75* 36* 48* 31* 41* 7* 9.3*
Abdelmalak 2013 I: intensive glucose management 54* 0* 0* 9* 16.7* 9* 16.7*
C: conventional glucose management 49* 1* 2* 4* 8.2* 4* 8.2*
Hermayer 2012 I: intensive glycaemic control 44 9
C: standard glycaemic control 49 12 24
Desai 2012 I: liberal blood glucose control 44* 1 2.3* 3* 8.1* 0* 0*
C: strict blood glucose control 37* 1 2.7* 3* 6.8* 0* 0*
Lazar 2011 I: aggressive glucose control 40 0 0 12 30 0 0
C: moderate glucose control 42 0 0 16 38 0 0
Cao 2010 I: intensive insulin therapy 92 4 4.3 7 7.6 15 16.3
C: conventional insulin therapy 87 5 5.7 16 18.4 37 42.5
Glucontrol 2009 I: intensive insulin treatment 55* 11* 20* 47* 85.5*
C: intermediate glucose control 69* 7* 10.1* 44* 63.8*
NICE SUGAR 2009 I: intensive insulin therapy 213* 57* 26.8* 57* 26.8* 32* 15*
C: conventional insulin therapy 208* 49* 23.6* 49* 23.6* 22* 10.6*
Subramaniam 2009 I: continuous insulin infusion 62* 0* 0* 22* 35.5* 22* 35.5*
C: standard intermittent sliding‐scale insulin 64* 0* 0* 16* 25* 16* 25*
Chan 2009 I: intensive insulin therapy 10* 0* 0* 1* 10* 1* 10*
C: conventional insulin therapy 22* 2* 9.1* 6* 27.3* 6* 27.3*
De La Rosa 2008 I: intensive insulin therapy 11* 6* 54.5* 6* 54.5* 3* 27.3*
C: conventional insulin therapy 2* 1* 50* 1* 50* 0* 0*
Gandhi 2007 I: intensive insulin therapy 37 2 5.4 13 35 3 8
C: conventional insulin therapy 36 0 0 16 44 1 3
Li 2006 I: continuous insulin infusion 51 2 3.9 42 82.4 3 5.9
C: glucometer‐guided insulin 42 1 2.4 36 85.7 2 4.8
Lazar 2004 I: tight glycaemic control with GIK 72 30 days postoperatively: 0
5 years follow‐up: 1
2.5 12 16.6 0 0
C: standard therapy 69 30 days postoperatively: 0
5 years follow‐up: 6
5.3 29 42 9 13
Rassias 1999 I: aggressive insulin therapy 13 0 0 0 0
C: standard insulin therapy 13 3 23.1 3 23.1
—: denotes not reported
* data provided by study authors (patients with diabetes).
adata from total study population.
I: intervention group; C: control group; CV: cardiovascular; GIK: glucose‐insulin‐potassium; MACE: major cardiovascular event.