Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 1;2023(8):CD007315. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007315.pub3

NCT00899483.

Methods Type of study: interventional
Allocation: randomised
Intervention model: parallel assignment
Masking: double (participant, outcomes assessor)
Primary purpose: treatment
Participants Conditions: type II diabetes mellitus patients, undergoing elective and urgent coronary artery bypass surgery
Gender: females and males
Age groups: 18 years to 80 years
Enrolment: 100 participants
Interventions Intervention: administered with glucose potassium insulin solution to achieve glycaemia 4.0 mmol/L to 6.0 mmol/L
Comparator: normal departmental practice using dextrose insulin infusion
Outcomes Primary outcome: the difference in the mean left ventricular end‐systolic volume index (LVESVI) after CABG and the amount of new permanent injury detected in the late CMRI study
Secondary outcome: glycaemic control
Reason for awaiting classification Unknown
Study details
Official title and purpose of study Can enhanced glycemic control in type II diabetics improve myocardial protection during coronary artery bypass grafting?
Notes