Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. 2023 Jul 7;9(7):e18100. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18100

Table 8.

Contains the results of the comparative analysis.

Aggregation Operators	Score values	Ranking and ordering
CSFAWA	$S (Ǽ_{1}) = 0.5035, S (Ǽ_{2}) = 0.4985,$ $S (Ǽ_{3}) = 0.4802, S (Ǽ_{4}) = 0.4658$ $S (Ǽ_{5}) = 0.4908$	$Ǽ_{1} ≻ Ǽ_{2} ≻ Ǽ_{5} ≻ Ǽ_{3} ≻ Ǽ_{4}$
CSFAWG	$S (Ǽ_{1}) = 0.7147, S (Ǽ_{2}) = 0.7162$ $S (Ǽ_{3}) = 0.7622, S (Ǽ_{4}) = 0.7657$ $S (Ǽ_{5}) = 0.7770$	$Ǽ_{5} ≻ Ǽ_{4} ≻ Ǽ_{3} ≻ Ǽ_{2} ≻ Ǽ_{1}$
CSFPWA by Akram et al. [53]	$S (Ǽ_{1}) = 0.6645, S (Ǽ_{2}) = 0.6514$ $S (Ǽ_{3}) = 0.6706, S (Ǽ_{4}) = 0.6551$ $S (Ǽ_{5}) = 0.6768$	$Ǽ_{5} ≻ Ǽ_{3} ≻ Ǽ_{1} ≻ Ǽ_{4} ≻ Ǽ_{2}$
CSFPWG by Akram et al. [53]	$S (Ǽ_{1}) = 0.5800, S (Ǽ_{2}) = 0.5813$ $S (Ǽ_{3}) = 0.6119, S (Ǽ_{4}) = 0.6165$ $S (Ǽ_{5}) = 0.6358$	$Ǽ_{5} ≻ Ǽ_{4} ≻ Ǽ_{3} ≻ Ǽ_{2} ≻ Ǽ_{1}$
CSFWA by Akram et al. [54]	$S (Ǽ_{1}) = 0.6620, S (Ǽ_{2}) = 0.6664$ $S (Ǽ_{3}) = 0.6828, S (Ǽ_{4}) = 0.6582$ $S (Ǽ_{5}) = 0.6908$	$Ǽ_{5} ≻ Ǽ_{3} ≻ Ǽ_{2} ≻ Ǽ_{1} ≻ Ǽ_{4}$
CSFWG by Akram et al. [54]	$S (Ǽ_{1}) = 0.5775, S (Ǽ_{2}) = 0.5937$ $S (Ǽ_{3}) = 0.6246, S (Ǽ_{4}) = 0.6220$ $S (Ǽ_{5}) = 0.6461$	$Ǽ_{5} ≻ Ǽ_{3} ≻ Ǽ_{4} ≻ Ǽ_{1} ≻ Ǽ_{2}$
CSFWPA by Naeem et al. [55]	$S (Ǽ_{1}) = 0.6597, S (Ǽ_{2}) = 0.6666$ $S (Ǽ_{3}) = 0.6755, S (Ǽ_{4}) = 0.6583$ $S (Ǽ_{5}) = 0.6909$	$Ǽ_{5} ≻ Ǽ_{3} ≻ Ǽ_{2} ≻ Ǽ_{1} ≻ Ǽ_{4}$
CSFWPG by Naeem et al. [55]	$S (Ǽ_{1}) = 0.5748, S (Ǽ_{2}) = 0.5891$ $S (Ǽ_{3}) = 0.6162, S (Ǽ_{4}) = 0.6191$ $S (Ǽ_{5}) = 0.6480$	$Ǽ_{5} ≻ Ǽ_{4} ≻ Ǽ_{3} ≻ Ǽ_{1} ≻ Ǽ_{2}$