Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jun 11.
Published in final edited form as: Alcohol Clin Exp Res (Hoboken). 2023 Jun 11;47(6):1088–1099. doi: 10.1111/acer.15077

Table 4:

Association Between mEMA Reported Substance Use and HRV Measures: Results of Multiple Regression Analysis

LnRMSSD LnLF/HF Ratio
Estimate (SE) DF t P value Estimate (SE) DF t P value
Intercept 3.72 (0.21) 66.6 17.89 <.0001 0.34 (0.12) 63.7 2.84 .006
Within Subject:
 Any Alcohol Use −0.14 (0.05) 1,646.2 −2.83 .005 0.14 (0.05) 1,651.1 2.51 .01
 Any nicotine use 0.09 (0.09) 1,643.8 0.97 .33 −0.08 (0.10) 1,644.2 −0.85 .40
 Any marijuana use 0.09 (0.08) 1,644.6 1.16 .24 0.05 (0.09) 1,648.0 0.56 .58
Between Subject:
 Any Alcohol Use −0.04 (0.44) 62.7 −0.09 .93 −0.08 (0.25) 60.6 −0.34 .74
 Any nicotine use −0.22 (0.19) 61.2 −1.15 .26 0.04 (0.11) 56.3 0.35 .73
 Any marijuana use −0.15 (0.44) 65.0 −0.34 .74 −0.10 (0.26) 69.3 −0.38 .71
 Pregnant (vs Postpartum) −0.02 (0.08) 62.4 −0.21 .83 −0.08 (0.05) 58.9 −1.77 .08
 Age 0.00 (0.01) 67.4 0.00 1.00 −0.01 (0.00) 64.8 −1.55 .13

Ln – natural log transformation

RMSSD, root-mean square differences of successive N-N intervals

LF/HF ratio: LF - low frequency (0.04–0.15 Hz); HF - high frequency (0.15–0.40 Hz) spectral components of HRV