. 2022 Oct 1;39(3):1399–1416. doi: 10.1007/s10899-022-10160-4

Table 3.

Predictive capacity of sex, age, gambling severity, emotion regulation and coping on cyberbullying severity: negative binomial regression

	B	SE	95%CI (B)		Wald	P
Community subsample (n = 250)
First model: exploring interaction parameters
Sex (0 = female; 1 = male)	0.020	0.245	− 0.459	0.499	0.007	.934
Age (years-old)	0.018	0.026	− 0.033	0.068	0.462	.497
Gambling severity (CAGI-GPSS total)	0.155	0.473	− 0.771	1.081	0.108	.743
DERS: Total score	0.028	0.007	0.015	0.042	16.629	< .001*
CSI; F3rd: adequate global	− 0.002	0.008	− 0.019	0.015	0.056	.812
CSI; F3rd: non-adequate global	0.014	0.010	− 0.007	0.035	1.778	.182
Interaction: gambling severity*Sex	0.189	0.250	− 0.300	0.679	0.575	.448
Interaction: gambling severity*Age	0.004	0.009	− 0.013	0.021	0.191	.662
Interaction: gambling severity*DERS-total	− 0.003	0.003	− 0.009	0.003	0.810	.368
Interaction: gambling severity*CSI-F3rd_adequate	0.001	0.004	-0.006	0.009	0.098	.754
Interaction: gambling severity*CSI-F3rd_non-adequate	− 0.007	0.005	− 0.017	0.002	2.167	.141
Final model
Sex (0 = female; 1 = male)	0.031	0.232	− 0.423	0.486	0.018	.893
Age (years-old)	0.027	0.023	− 0.018	0.072	1.363	.243
Gambling severity (CAGI-GPSS total)	− 0.026	0.044	− 0.112	0.059	0.369	.543
DERS: Total score	0.027	0.006	0.014	0.039	17.420	< .001*
CSI; F3rd: adequate global	− 0.002	0.008	− 0.017	0.014	0.053	.818
CSI; F3rd: non-adequate global	0.009	0.010	− 0.010	0.028	0.927	.336
Clinical subsample (n = 31)
First model: exploring interaction parameters
Sex (0 = female; 1 = male)	− 0.408	1.982	− 4.293	3.477	0.042	.837
Age (years-old)	0.703	0.414	− 0.109	1.515	2.877	.090
Gambling severity (CAGI-GPSS total)	2.162	1.079	0.046	4.277	4.012	.045*
DERS: Total score	0.010	0.058	− 0.104	0.124	0.029	.864
CSI; F3rd: adequate global	0.039	0.045	− 0.049	0.128	0.770	.380
CSI; Factor 3r: non-adequate global	0.045	0.045	− 0.043	0.134	1.005	.316
Interaction: gambling severity*Sex	0.084	0.159	− 0.230	0.395	0.525	0.600
Interaction: gambling severity*age	− 0.104	0.051	− 0.204	− 0.003	4.075	.044*
Interaction: gambling severity*DERS-total	0.001	0.004	− 0.008	0.009	0.041	.840
Interaction: gambling severity*CSI-F3rd_adequate	− 0.003	0.004	− 0.011	0.004	0.851	.356
Interaction: gambling severity*CSI-F3rd_non-adequate	− 0.003	0.005	− 0.012	0.006	0.455	.500
Final model
Sex (0 = female; 1 = male)	− 0.829	1.591	− 3.948	2.291	0.271	.603
Age (years-old)	0.768	0.401	− 0.018	1.554	3.670	.055
Gambling severity^a
Young age (P₀₅ = 17 years-old)	0.224	0.155	− 0.080	0.528	2.084	.149
Middle age(P₅₀ = 21 years-old)	− 0.225	0.087	− 0.395	− 0.055	6.752	.009*
Old age (P₉₅ = 24 years-old)	− 0.562	0.225	− 1.002	− 0.122	6.261	.012*
DERS: Total score	0.017	0.023	− 0.029	0.063	0.544	.461
CSI; F3rd: adequate global	0.010	0.032	− 0.053	0.073	0.090	.764
CSI; F3rd: non-adequate global	0.030	0.034	− 0.037	0.098	0.764	.382
Interaction: gambling severity*age	− 0.112	0.051	− 0.213	− 0.012	4.782	.029*

^*Bold: significant parameter (.05 level). F3rd: third order factor

^aSingle effects for gambling severity for the percentiles of age 5, 50 and 95 in the group