Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 19;37(4):647–654. doi: 10.1007/s10557-021-07307-7

Table 2.

The effect of 2-AG on cardiac function in diabetic mice

CON DM DM + 2-AG P value
HR, bpm 515.57 ± 40.32 458.57 ± 32.44* 521.14 ± 60.97# 0.038
LVEF, % 80.97 ± 2.57 71.28 ± 6.72** 78.83 ± 4.99# 0.006
LVFS, % 43.66 ± 2.56 35.38 ± 5.34** 41.09 ± 4.96# 0.008
LVIDd, mm 3.50 ± 0.22 3.54 ± 0.30 3.48 ± 0.31 0.691
LVIDs, mm 1.97 ± 0.14 2.29 ± 0.24* 2.00 ± 0.27# 0.047
LVFWd, mm 0.84 ± 0.06 0.71 ± 0.04*** 0.81 ± 0.07## 0.002
LVFWs, mm 1.01 ± 0.07 0.90 ± 0.12* 1.04 ± 0.10# 0.029
LVPWd, mm 0.86 ± 0.05 0.77 ± 0.05* 0.84 ± 0.08# 0.040
LVPWs, mm 1.07 ± 0.08 0.97 ± 0.08* 1.11 ± 0.11## 0.020
IVSd, mm 0.89 ± 0.04 0.81 ± 0.04* 0.89 ± 0.07# 0.021
IVSs, mm 1.10 ± 0.08 1.03 ± 0.08 1.13 ± 0.10 0.102

Transthoracic echocardiography was performed on control and diabetic mice at the conclusion of the study. Cardiac parameters: HR, heart rate; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction %; LVFS, left ventricular fractional shortening %; LVIDd and LVIDs, left ventricular internal diameter end-diastole and end-systole; LVFWd and LVFWs, left ventricular forward wall at end-diastole and end-systole; LVPWd and LVPWs, left ventricular posterior wall at end-diastole and end-systole; IVSd and IVSs, interventricular septal thickness at end-diastole and end-systole. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 compared with CON group; #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01 with DM group. n = 7