Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 2;9:22. doi: 10.1186/s40729-023-00486-y

Table 2.

Changes of overall MDAS, OSE and OHIP score related to influencing factors of patients' demographics

Variable No. patients (%) Change of overall MDAS score Change of overall OSE score Change of overall OHIP score
Mean ± SD p-value Mean ± SD p-value Mean ± SD p-value
Age 44.9 ± 12.0 [24–70]
Age ≤ 40 13 (33.3%) − 0.8 ± 3.2 0.359 27.2 ± 32.4 0.129 − 4.1 ± 8.7 0.189
40 < age ≤ 60 22 (56.4%) − 1.1 ± 5.7 36.4 ± 29.2 − 6.6 ± 14.9
Age > 60 4 (10.3%) 2.0 ± 2.7 63.0 ± 19.6 − 12.3 ± 7.4
Gender
 Male 22 (56.4%) − 0.7 ± 4.1 0.432 29.0 ± 30.7 0.076 − 2.5 ± 8.5 0.047*
 Female 17 (43.6%) − 0.6 ± 5.6 45.2 ± 28.8 − 11.3 ± 15.1
Educational status
 None/primary/middle school 5 (12.8%) − 1.4 ± 3.0 0.780 39.2 ± 34.2 0.126 − 7.0 ± 8.1 0.761
 College/undergraduate 27 (69.2%) − 0.6 ± 5.6 41.3 ± 31.5 − 6.8 ± 14.5
 MS/PhD 7 (18.0%) − 0.4 ± 1.5 13.7 ± 11.1 − 4.1 ± 5.6
Tooth loss number
 Single 22 (56.4%) − 0.9 ± 5.2 0.898 36.2 ± 31.3 0.910 − 9.9 ± 14.1 0.063
 Multiple 17 (43.6%) − 0.4 ± 4.2 35.8 ± 30.6 − 1.8 ± 8.3
Smoking habit
 Yes 7 (17.9%) − 0.9 ± 3.5 0.386 44.6 ± 27.5 0.410 − 5.7 ± 7.3 0.840
 No 32 (82.1%) − 0.6 ± 5.0 34.2 ± 31.3 − 6.5 ± 13.4
Simultaneously bone augmentation
 Yes 22 (56.4%) − 0.3 ± 4.0 0.764 29.3 ± 30.0 0.076 − 3.0 ± 9.5 0.069
 No 17 (43.6%) − 1.1 ± 5.6 44.8 ± 29.9 − 10.6 ± 14.7
Loading timing
 Immediate 4 (10.3%) − 0.5 ± 8.2 0.981 35.5 ± 25.0 0.945 − 9.5 ± 12.9 0.404
 Delayed 35 (89.7%) − 0.7 ± 4.4 36.1 ± 31.4 − 6.0 ± 12.6
Prosthesis type
 Zirconia 36 (92.3%) − 0.8 ± 4.8 0.832 36.4 ± 30.6 0.792 − 6.2 ± 13.0 0.178
 PFM 3 (7.7%) 0.7 ± 5.0 32.3 ± 36.6 − 8.0 ± 1.7

*p < 0.05 compared to other variable items by Mann–Whitney U test (gender, tooth loss number, smoking habit, simultaneously bone augmentation, loading timing and prosthesis type) and Kruskal–Wallis test by Bonferroni correction (age and educational status)