Table 3.
Linearization of the second order kinetic model for CS essential oil isolation using conventional CCH, and Dual-function GC/MS optimized ultrasound-assisted hydrodistillation prototype (DF-GC/MS-HUS) methods.
| Isolation methodsa | Slope | Cs (g L−1) | Intercept | K2 (L g min−1) | R2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conventional CCH | 9.94 × 10− ± 0.001 | 0.020 ± 0.001 | − 3.341 × 10–7 ± 0.001 | 0.0673 ± 0.0001 | 0.9940 ± 0.0001 |
| DF-GC/MS-HUS Prototype | 0.013 ± 0.001* | 0.890 ± 0.001* | − 8.367 × 10–8 ± 0.001* | 0.0235 ± 0.0001* | 0.9785 ± 0.0001 |
aValues obtained from OriginPro.
* indicates a significant difference between Conventional CCH and prototype methods (p < 0.05).