Table 4.
The chemical composition of oils extracted using the dual-function GC/MS optimized ultrasound-assisted hydrodistillation prototype (DF-GC/MS-HUD prototype), and the conventional Clevenger hydrodistillation (CCH) methods.
| Composition (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chemical nature/no | RT | Compounds | CCH EO | DF-GC/MS-HUD EO |
| Alcohols | ||||
| 1 | 5.73 | 1-Octanol | 0.08 ± 0.01 | 0.15 ± 0.01* |
| 2 | 6.04 | Linalool | 1.28 ± 0.01 | 2.24 ± 0.01* |
| 3 | 7.27 | Trans-p-Mentha-2,8-dien-1-ol | 0.04 ± 0.01 | 1.20 ± 0.01* |
| 4 | 7.44 | Cis-p-Mentha-2,8-dien-1-ol | Tr | 2.40 ± 0.01* |
| 5 | 8.00 | α-Terpineol | 0.40 ± 0.01 | 1.10 ± 0.01* |
| 6 | 8.23 | (E)-Carveol | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 2.20 ± 0.01* |
| 7 | 8.29 | (Z)-Carveol | 0.06 ± 0.01 | 1.11 ± 0.01 |
| 8 | 8.96 | p-Mentha-1,8-dien-9-ol | 0.05 ± 0.01 | 0.33 ± 0.01 |
| Aldehydes | ||||
| 9 | 7.08 | Nonanal | 0.14 ± 0.01 | 0.15 ± 0.01 |
| 10 | 5.05 | Octanal | 0.57 ± 0.01 | Tr |
| 11 | 7.54 | Citronellal | 0.20 ± 0.01 | Tr |
| 12 | 8.09 | Decanal | 0.55 ± 0.01 | 0.44 ± 0.01 |
| 13 | 8.42 | β-Citral | 0.20 ± 0.01 | 0.18 ± 0.01 |
| 14 | 8.71 | α-Citral | 0.25 ± 0.01 | 0.20 ± 0.01 |
| 15 | 9.12 | Dodecanal | 0.15 ± 0.01 | Tr |
| 16 | 12.96 | β-Sinensal | 0.13 ± 0.01 | Tr |
| 17 | 14.54 | α-Sinensal | 0.08 ± 0.01 | Tr |
| 18 | 8.81 | Perillaldehyde | 0.08 ± 0.01 | 0.40 ± 0.01 |
| Ketone | ||||
| 19 | 8.49 | Carvone | 0.05 ± 0.01 | 3.40 ± 0.01* |
| Terpenes | ||||
| 20 | 4.34 | α-Pinene | 2.10 ± 0.01 | 4.20 ± 0.01* |
| 21 | 4.75 | Sabinene | 1.13 ± 0.01 | 2.24 ± 0.01* |
| 22 | 4.90 | β-Myrcene | 5.33 ± 0.01 | 7.55 ± 0.01* |
| 23 | 5.13 | 3-Carene | 0.54 ± 0.01 | 0.74 ± 0.01* |
| 24 | 4.49 | Limonene | 60.23 ± 0.01 | 81.32 ± 0.01* |
| 25 | 9.79 | α-Copaene | 0.11 ± 0.01 | Tr |
| 26 | 9.90 | β-Cupepene | 0.12 ± 0.01 | Tr |
| 27 | 9.95 | Valencene | 0.20 ± 0.01 | 0.38 ± 0.01 |
| 28 | 11.05 | α-Farnesene | 0.05 ± 0.01 | 0.99 ± 0.01* |
| Epoxide | ||||
| 29 | 7.37 | Limonene 1,2-epoxide | Tr | 2.88 ± 0.01* |
| Total | 96.03 ± 0.01 | 97.17 ± 0.01 | ||
*Indicates a significant difference between Conventional CCH and prototype methods (p < 0.05).
“tr.” Indicates less than 0.01, RT, retention times.