Strength of Evidence Grade | Study Design; No. Studies (N) | Study Limitations | Directness | Consistency | Precision | Reporting Bias | Other Issues | Finding |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Key Question 1. Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia | ||||||||
Alirocumab vs. placebo x 6 weeks in patients taking atorvastatin 10 mg-40 mg7 | ||||||||
LDL-C lowering ability | ||||||||
LDL-C: Insufficient | 1 RCT, N = 21 | Medium | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Undetected | None | No conclusion; range in difference in percent change from baseline vs. placebo (% points): -41.4% to -55.7% |
HDL-C raising ability | ||||||||
HDL-C: Insufficient | 1 RCT, N = 21 | Medium | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Undetected | None | No conclusion; significant difference in % change from baseline for 50 mg or 100 mg dose, but greater increase for 150 mg vs. placebo = 23.0% (P = 0.033) |
Overall adverse events | ||||||||
Overall AE: Insufficient | 1 RCT, N = 21 | Medium | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Undetected | None | Greater only for 150 mg dose: 80% vs. 0%; EPC-calculated P = 0.015 |
Withdrawals due to adverse events | ||||||||
AE withdrawal: Insufficient | 1 RCT, N = 21 | Medium | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Undetected | None | No difference; no events |
Serious adverse events | ||||||||
Serious AE: Insufficient | 1 RCT, N = 21 | Medium | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Undetected | None | No difference; no events |
Specific adverse events: neurocognitive events | ||||||||
Neurocognitive dysfunction: Insufficient | 1 RCT, N = 21 | Medium | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Undetected | None | No difference; no events |
Specific adverse events: injection site | ||||||||
Injection site erythema: Insufficient | 1 RCT, N = 21 | Medium | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Undetected | None | No difference; no events |
Alirocumab vs. placebo × 12 weeks in patients taking mixed max statin plus ezetimibe6 | ||||||||
LDL-C lowering ability | ||||||||
LDL-C: Low | 1 RCT, N = 77 | Medium | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Undetected | None | Greater reduction; range in absolute difference in percent change from baseline vs. placebo (% points): -18% to -57% |
HDL-C raising ability | ||||||||
HDL-C: Low | 1 RCT, N = 77 | Medium | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Undetected | None | No significant difference in % change from baseline except for 150 mg every 2 weeks: +12.34% vs. +2.20%; P=0.050 |
Overall adverse events | ||||||||
Overall AE: Insufficient | 1 RCT, N = 77 | Medium | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Undetected | None | No difference: 75% to 87% for alirocumab vs. 60% for placebo |
Withdrawals due to adverse events | ||||||||
AE withdrawal: Insufficient | 1 RCT, N = 77 | Medium | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Undetected | None | No difference; only 1 patient taking alirocumab 300 mg every 4 weeks |
Serious adverse events | ||||||||
Serious AE: Insufficient | 1 RCT, N = 77 | Medium | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Undetected | None | No difference; only 1 patient in the placebo group with GI disorder |
Specific adverse events: neurocognitive events | ||||||||
Neurocognitive dysfunction: Insufficient | 1 RCT, N = 77 | Medium | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Undetected | None | No difference; no events |
Specific adverse events: injection site | ||||||||
Injection site reactions: Insufficient | 1 RCT, N = 77 | Medium | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Undetected | None | No difference; 27% to 47% vs. 13% |
Evolocumab vs. placebo × 12 weeks in patients taking high-intensity statins+ezetimibe (RUTHERFORD 1 and 2)12,13 | ||||||||
LDL-C lowering ability | ||||||||
LDL-C: High | 2 RCTs, N = 499 | Low | Direct | Consistent | Precise | Undetected | None | Greater reductions for evolocumab: absolute difference vs. placebo in change from baseline (% points): range, -44% to -61% |
HDL-C raising ability | ||||||||
HDL-C: Moderate | 2 RCTs, N = 499 | Low | Direct | Consistent | Imprecise | Undetected | None | Greater increase for evolocumab: absolute difference vs. placebo in change from baseline (% points): range, 6.8% to 9.2% |
Overall adverse events | ||||||||
Overall AE: Moderate | 2 RCTs, N = 499 | Low | Direct | Consistent | Imprecise | Undetected | None | No difference; 58% vs. 52%; EPC-pooled RR 1.12 (95% CI, 0.94 to 1.33) |
Withdrawals due to adverse events | ||||||||
AE withdrawal: Moderate | 2 RCTs, N = 499 | Low | Direct | Consistent | Imprecise | Undetected | None | No difference; 0.6% vs. 0.6%; pooled RR not possible because of no events in RUTHERFORD-2 |
Serious adverse events | ||||||||
Serious AE: Moderate | 2 RCTs, N = 499 | Low | Direct | Consistent | Imprecise | Undetected | None | No difference; 3% vs. 3%; EPC-pooled RR 0.81 (95% CI, 0.28 to 2.33) |
Specific adverse events: neurocognitive events | ||||||||
Neurocognitive dysfunction: Moderate | 2 RCTs, N = 499 | Low | Direct | Consistent | Imprecise | Undetected | None | No events |
Specific adverse events: injection site | ||||||||
Injection site: Moderate | 2 RCTs, N = 499 | Low | Direct | Consistent | Imprecise | Undetected | None | 6% vs. 3%; EPC-pooled RR 0.76 (95% CI, 0.76 to 5.21) |
Key Question 2. Homozygous Familiar Hypercholesterolemia | ||||||||
Evolocumab 420 mg Q4 weeks × 12 weeks in patients taking a statin with or without ezetimibe vs. placebo | ||||||||
LDL-C lowering ability | ||||||||
Evolocumab vs. Placebo: Low | RCT 1 (50) | Low | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Not detected | None | Evolocumab significantly reduced ultracentrifugation LDL-C at 12 weeks by 32.1% (95% CI, 45.1 to -19.2) compared to placebo |
HDL-C raising ability | ||||||||
Evolocumab vs. Placebo: Low | RCT 1 (50) | Low | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Not detected | None | Evolocumab reduced HDL-C by 0.1% (95% CI, -9.4% to 9.2%) at week 12 compared to placebo (NS) |
Overall adverse events | ||||||||
Evolocumab vs. Placebo: Low | RCT 1 (50) | Low | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Not detected | None | Any treatment emergent adverse events: Evolocumab vs. Placebo: 36% (12/33) vs. 63% (10/16) |
Withdrawals due to adverse events | ||||||||
Evolocumab vs. Placebo: Low | RCT 1 (50) | Low | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Not detected | None | No difference in treatment emergent adverse events leading to discontinuation of study drug: Evolocumab vs. Placebo: 0% (0/33) vs. 0% (0/16) |
Serious adverse events | ||||||||
Evolocumab vs. Placebo: Low | RCT 1 (50) | Low | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Not detected | None | No difference in serious treatment emergent adverse events: Evolocumab vs. Placebo: 0% (0/33) vs. 0% (0/16) |
Specific adverse events: neurocognitive eventsa | ||||||||
Evolocumab vs. Placebo: Low | RCT 1 (50) | Low | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Not detected | None | No difference between groups in neurocognitive events: Evolocumab vs. Placebo: 0% (0/33) vs. 0% (0/16) |
Specific adverse events: potential injection-site reactionsb | ||||||||
Evolocumab vs. Placebo: Low | RCT 1 (50) | Low | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Not detected | None | Potential injection-site reactions: Evolocumab vs. Placebo: 0% (0/33) vs. 6% (1/16) |
Specific adverse events: gastroenteritis | ||||||||
Evolocumab vs. Placebo: Low | RCT 1 (50) | Low | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Not detected | None | Gastroenteritis: Evolocumab vs. Placebo: 6% (2/33) vs. 0% (0/16) |
Key Question 3. Not at Target | ||||||||
Alirocumab 150 mg Q2 weeks x 8-12 weeks vs. placebo | ||||||||
LDL-C lowering ability | ||||||||
% at target (< 70 mg/dl) | ||||||||
Alirocumab + low-dose statin vs. Placebo + high-dose statin Low | RCT 1 (61) | Medium | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Not detected | None | 100% vs. 52% |
Alirocumab vs. Placebo + low-moderate dose statin Low | RCT 1 (31) | Medium | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Not detected | None | 100% vs. 16.1% |
Alirocumab vs. Placebo + high-dose statin Low | RCT 1 (62) | Medium | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Not detected | None | 100% vs. 52% |
% change in LDL | ||||||||
Alirocumab + low-dose statin vs. Placebo + high-dose statin × 8 wks Low | RCT 1 (61) | Medium | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Not detected | None | Difference in LDL-C lowering: 48.9%, P < 0.001 |
Alirocumab vs. Placebo + moderate dose statin × 12 wks Low | RCT 1 (31) | Medium | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Not detected | None | Difference in LDL-C lowering: 67.3%, P < 0.001 |
% change in LDL | ||||||||
Alirocumab vs. Placebo + high-dose statin × 8 wks Low | RCT 1 (62) | Medium | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Not detected | None | Difference in LDL-C lowering: 55.9%, P < 0.001 |
% change in HDL | ||||||||
Alirocumab + low-dose statin vs. Placebo + high-dose statin × 8 wks Low | RCT 1 (61) | Medium | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Not detected | None | Difference in HDL-C lowering: 6 mg/dl; P = 0.06 |
Alirocumab vs. Placebo + moderate dose statin × 12 wks Low | RCT 1 (31) | Medium | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Not detected | None | Difference in HDL-C lowering: 6.5 mg/dl; P = 0.057 |
Alirocumab vs. Placebo + high-dose statin × 8 wks Low | RCT 1 (62) | Medium | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Not detected | None | Difference in HDL-C lowering: 9.4 mg/dL; P = 0.05 |
Overall adverse events | ||||||||
Alirocumab + low-dose statin vs. Placebo + high-dose statin Insufficient | RCT 1 (61) | Medium | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Not detected | None | 61% vs. 45% |
Alirocumab vs. Placebo + low/moderate-dose statin Insufficient | RCT 1 (31) | Medium | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Not detected | None | 61.3% vs. 45.2% |
Alirocumab vs. Placebo + high-dose statin Insufficient | RCT 1 (62) | Medium | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Not detected | None | 61% vs. 60% |
Withdrawals due to adverse events | ||||||||
Alirocumab + low-dose statin vs. Placebo + high-dose statin Insufficient | RCT 1 (61) | Medium | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Not detected | None | 0% vs. 13% |
Alirocumab vs. Placebo + low/moderate-dose statin Insufficient | RCT 1 (31) | Medium | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Not detected | None | 3.2% vs. 0% |
Alirocumab vs. Placebo + highdose statin Insufficient | RCT 1 (62) | Medium | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Not detected | None | 3% vs. 13% |
Serious adverse events | ||||||||
Alirocumab + low-dose statin vs. Placebo + high-dose statin | RCT 1 (61) | Medium | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Not detected | None | 0 vs. 0 |
Alirocumab vs. Placebo + low/moderate-dose statin | RCT 1 (31) | Medium | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Not detected | None | 0% vs. 3.2% |
Alirocumab vs. Placebo + highdose statin Insufficient | RCT 1 (62) | Medium | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Not detected | None | 0% vs. 3% |
Specific adverse events: potential injection-site reactionsb | ||||||||
Alirocumab + low-dose statin vs. Placebo + high-dose statin | RCT 1 (61) | Medium | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Not detected | None | 0% vs. 6.5% |
Alirocumab vs. Placebo + low/moderate-dose statin Insufficient | RCT 1 (31) | Medium | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Not detected | None | 3.2 to 32% vs. 0% |
Alirocumab vs. Placebo + highdose statin Insufficient | RCT 1 (62) | Medium | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Not detected | None | 3.3% vs. 6.5% |
Alirocumab 75 mg to 150 mg Q 2 weeks vs. placebo at 24 weeks in high-risk patients | ||||||||
LDL-C lowering ability | ||||||||
% at target (< 70 mg/dl) | ||||||||
Alirocumab + | RCT | Low | Direct | Consistent | Precise | Not detected | None | Pooled RR 9.65 (95% |
max-dose | 2 (2,656) | CI, 7.7 to 12.0) | ||||||
statin vs. | (75-79% vs. 8-9%) | |||||||
Placebo + | ||||||||
max-dose | ||||||||
statin | ||||||||
High | ||||||||
Alirocumab + | RCT | Low | Direct | Unknown | Precise | Not detected | None | 77% vs. 45.6% |
max-dose | 1 (720) | RR 1.70 (95% CI, | ||||||
statin vs. | 1.46 to 1.95) | |||||||
ezetimibe | ||||||||
10 mg + | ||||||||
max-dose | ||||||||
statin | ||||||||
Moderate | ||||||||
% change in LDL | ||||||||
Alirocumab + | RCT | Low | Direct | Consistent | Precise | Not detected | None | Differenc = -45.9%, |
max-dose | 2 (2,656) | P < 0.001 (primarily | ||||||
statin vs. | 75 mg Q2 wks) | |||||||
Placebo + | -61.9%, P < 0.001 | |||||||
max-dose | (150 mg Q2 wks) | |||||||
statin | ||||||||
High | ||||||||
Alirocumab | RCT | Low | Direct | Unknown | Precise | Not detected | None | Difference = -29.8%, |
+ max-dose | 1 (720) | P < 0.001 | ||||||
statin vs. | ||||||||
ezetimibe 10 | ||||||||
mg + max- | ||||||||
dose statin | ||||||||
Moderate | ||||||||
% change in HDL | ||||||||
Alirocumab | RCT | Low | Direct | Consistent | Imprecise | Not detected | None | 7.3, 95% Cl, 3.6 to |
+ max-dose | 2 (2,656) | 11.0; P < 0.001 | ||||||
statin vs. | (primarily 75 mg Q2 | |||||||
Placebo + | wks)4.6 (0.7); 3.3 to | |||||||
max-dose | 5.9, P < 0.001 (150 mg | |||||||
statin | Q2 wks) | |||||||
Moderate | ||||||||
Alirocumab + | RCT | Low | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Not detected | None | Difference = |
max-dose | 1 (720) | 8.1% (1.3), P < 0.001 | ||||||
statin vs. | ||||||||
ezetimibe | ||||||||
10 mg + | ||||||||
max-dose | ||||||||
statin | ||||||||
Low | ||||||||
Overall adverse events | ||||||||
Alirocumab + | RCT | Low | Direct | Consistent | Precise | Not detected | None | 81.0% vs. 82.5% |
max-dose statin | 2 (2,656) | 75.8% vs. 75.7% | ||||||
vs. Placebo + | ||||||||
max-dose statin | ||||||||
High | ||||||||
Alirocumab + | RCT | Low | Direct | Unknown | Precise | Not detected | None | 71.2% vs. 67.2% |
max-dose | 1 (720) | |||||||
statin vs. ezeti- | ||||||||
mibe 10 mg + | ||||||||
max-dose | ||||||||
statin | ||||||||
Moderate | ||||||||
Withdrawals due to adverse events | ||||||||
Alirocumab + max-dose statin vs. Placebo + max-dose statin Moderate | RCT 2 (2,656) | Low | Direct | Consistent | Imprecise | Not detected | None | 7.2% vs. 5.8% 6.3% vs. 7.5% |
Alirocumab + max-dose statin vs. ezetimibe 10 mg + max-dose statin Low | RCT 1 (720) | Low | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Not detected | None | 7.5% vs. 5.4% |
Serious adverse events | ||||||||
Alirocumab + max-dose statin vs. Placebo + max-dose statin High | RCT 2 (2,656) | Low | Direct | Consistent | Precise | Not detected | None | 18.7% vs. 19.5% 12.6% vs. 13.1% |
Alirocumab + max-dose statin vs. ezetimibe 10 mg + max-dose statin Low | RCT 1 (720) | Low | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Not detected | None | 18.8% vs. 17.8% |
Specific adverse events: potential injection-site reactionsb | ||||||||
Alirocumab + max-dose statin vs. Placebo + max-dose statin Low | RCT 2 (2,656) | Low | Direct | Inconsistent | Imprecise | Not detected | None | Pooled RR 1.4 (95% CI, 0.98 to 2.1) Rates 5.9% vs. 4.2% and 5.3% vs. 2.8% |
Alirocumab + max-dose statin vs. ezetimibe 10 mg + maxdose statin Low | RCT 1 (720) | Low | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Not detected | None | 2.5% vs. 0.8% |
Specific adverse events | ||||||||
Neurocognitive events | ||||||||
Alirocumab + ma x-dose statin vs. Placebo + max-dose statin Moderate | RCT 2 (2,656) | Low | Direct | Consistent | Imprecise | Not detected | None | 1.2% vs. 0.5%; P = 0.17; 0 vs. 0.9% |
Alirocumab + ma x-dose statin vs. ezetimibe 10 mg + max-dose statin Low | RCT 1 (720) | Low | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Not detected | None | 0.8% vs. 1.2% |
CV events (adjudicated) | ||||||||
Alirocumab + max-dose statin vs. Placebo + max-dose statin Moderate | RCT 2 (2,656) | Low | Direct | Consistent | Imprecise | Not detected | None | Pooled RR 0.91 (95% CI, 0.63 to 1.31) |
Alirocumab + max-dose statin vs. ezetimibe 10 mg + max-dose statin Low | RCT 1 (720) | Low | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Not detected | None | RR 1.29 (95% CI, 0.60 to 2.74) |
Evolocumab 420 mg Q4 weeks x 52 weeks vs. placebo | ||||||||
LDL-C lowering ability | ||||||||
% at target (< 70 mg/dl) | ||||||||
Evolocumab 420 mg Q 4 weeks × 48 weeks vs. Placebo Moderate | RCT 1 (901) | Low | Direct | Unknown | Precise | Not detected | None | 82.3% evolocumab vs. 6.4% placebo; P < 0.001 |
% change in LDL at 52 weeks | ||||||||
Evolocumab 420 mg Q 4 weeks × 48 weeks vs. Placebo: Moderate | RCT 1 (901) | Low | Direct | Unknown | Precise | Not detected | None | Difference in ultracen-trifugation LDL-C at 52 weeks -57% (± 2.1 SD) compared to placebo |
% change in HDL at 52 weeks | ||||||||
Evolocumab 420 mg Q 4 weeks × 48 weeks vs. Placebo: Low | RCT 1 (901) | Low | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Not detected | None | Difference vs. placebo in % change from baseline: 5.4%; P < 0.001 |
Overall adverse events | ||||||||
Evolocumab vs. Placebo: Moderate | RCT 1 (901) | Low | Direct | Unknown | Precise | Not detected | None | Evolocumab vs. Placebo: 75% vs. 74% |
Withdrawals due to adverse events | ||||||||
Evolocumab vs. Placebo: Low | RCT 1 (901) | Low | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Not detected | None | Evolocumab vs. Placebo: 2% (13/599) vs. 1% (3/302) |
Serious adverse events | ||||||||
Evolocumab vs. Placebo: Low | RCT 1 (901) | Low | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Not detected | None | Evolocumab vs. Placebo: 6% vs. 4% |
Specific adverse events: potential injection-site reactionsb | ||||||||
Evolocumab vs. Placebo: Low | RCT 1 (901) | Low | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Not detected | None | Evolocumab vs. Placebo: 5.7% (34/599) vs. 5% (15/302) |
Evolocumab 420 mg Q4 weeks x 12 weeks vs. placebo | ||||||||
LDL-C lowering ability | ||||||||
% at target (< 70 mg/dl) | ||||||||
Evolocumab 420 mg Q4 weeks × 12 weeks vs. Placebo High | RCT 2 (640 at 420 mg, 356 placebo) | Low | Direct | Consistent | Precise | Not detected | None | 72% to 94% for evolocumab vs. 0% to 9% for placebo; P < 0.001 |
% change in LDL at 12 weeks | ||||||||
Evolocumab 420 mg Q 4 weeks × 12 weeks vs. Placebo: High | RCT 2 (640 at 420 mg, 356 placebo) | Low | Direct | Consistent | Precise | Not detected | None | Difference in ultra-centrifugation LDL-C -53% (95% CI, 56.0 to 44.6) to -70.5% (95% CI, -79.8 to -61.2) compared to placebo. |
% change in HDL at 12 weeks | ||||||||
Evolocumab 420 mg Q4 weeks × 12 weeks vs. Placebo: Moderate | RCT 2 (640 at 420 mg, 356 placebo) | Low | Direct | Consistent | Imprecise | Not detected | None | Difference from placebo in % change from baseline: ranging from 4.5% (95% CI, 0.4 to 8.7) to 9.1% (95% CI, 4.4 to 13.7) |
Overall adverse events | ||||||||
Evolocumab vs. Placebo: High | RCT 2 (640 at 420 mg, 356 placebo) | Low | Direct | Consistent | Precise | Not detected | None | Ranged from 31% to 60% with evolocumab 420 mg every 4 weeks and from 24% to 49% in the placebo group |
Withdrawals due to adverse events | ||||||||
Evolocumab vs. Placebo: Moderate | RCT 2 (640 at 420 mg, 356 placebo) | Low | Direct | Consistent | Imprecise | Not detected | None | Evolocumab vs. Placebo: 1-2% vs. 2-4% |
Serious adverse events | ||||||||
Evolocumab vs. Placebo: Moderate | RCT 2 (640 at 420 mg, 356 placebo) | Low | Direct | Consistent | Imprecise | Not detected | None | No difference, Evolocumab vs. Placebo: 0.9-2.7% vs. 1.8-3.6% |
Specific adverse events: potential injection-site reactionsb | ||||||||
Evolocumab vs. Placebo: Moderate | RCT 2 (640 at 420 mg, 356 placebo) | Low | Direct | Consistent | Imprecise | Not detected | None | No difference, Evolocumab vs. Placebo: 0% vs. 1.3% in LAPLACE-TIMI-5 7; NR by group in LAPLACE-2 |
Evolocumab 420 mg Q4 weeks x 12 weeks vs. placebo, both added to primarily moderate-intensity statins in Japanese patients with high cardiovascular risk11 | ||||||||
LDL-C lowering ability | ||||||||
% at target (< 70 mg/dl) | ||||||||
Evolocumab 420 mg Q4 weeks × 12 weeks vs. placebo: Low | 1 RCT; evolocumab 420 mg Q4 weeks N = 53, placebo every month N = 51 | Medium | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Not detected | None | Greater for evo- locumab: < 100: 96% vs. 1%; P < 0.001 < 70: 82% vs. 0%; P < 0.001 |
% change in LDL at 12 weeks | ||||||||
Evolocumab 420 mg Q 4 weeks × 12 weeks vs. placebo: Low | 1 RCT; evolocumab 420 mg Q4 weeks N = 53, placebo every month N = 51 | Medium | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Not detected | None | Greater for evolocumab: Mean % change vs. placebo: -63.9%; P < 0.001 |
% change in HDL at 12 weeks | ||||||||
Evolocumab 420 mg Q 4 weeks × 12 weeks vs. placebo: Insufficient | 1 RCT; evolocumab 420 mg Q4 weeks N = 53, placebo every month N = 51 | Medium | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Not detected | None | No conclusion: Mean % change vs. placebo: 13.2%; P < 0.001 |
Overall adverse events | ||||||||
Evolocumab 420 mg Q4 weeks × 12 weeks vs. placebo: Insufficient | 1 RCT; evolocumab 420 mg Q 4 weeks N = 53, placebo every month N = 51 | Medium | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Not detected | None | No conclusion; 58.5% vs. 42.0% |
Withdrawals due to adverse events | ||||||||
Evolocumab 420 mg Q4 weeks × 12 weeks vs. placebo: Insufficient | 1 RCT; evolocumab 420 mg Q4 weeks N = 53, placebo every month N = 51 | Medium | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Not detected | None | No conclusion; 3.8% vs. 0 |
Serious adverse events | ||||||||
Evolocumab 420 mg Q4 weeks × 12 weeks vs. placebo: Insufficient | 1 RCT; evolocumab 420 mg Q4 weeks N = 53, placebo every month N = 51 | Medium | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Not detected | None | No conclusion; 3.8% vs. 0 |
Specific adverse events: potential injection-site reactionsb | ||||||||
Evolocumab 420 mg Q 4 weeks × 12 weeks vs. placebo: Insufficient | 1 RCT; evolocumab 420 mg Q 4 weeks N = 53, placebo every month N = 51 | Medium | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Not detected | None | No conclusion; 1.9% vs. 0 |
Evolocumab 420 mg Q4 weeks x 12 weeks vs. ezetimibe 10 mg, both added to moderate-high intensity statins | ||||||||
LDL-C lowering ability | ||||||||
% at target (< 70 mg/dl) | ||||||||
Evolocumab 420 mg Q 4 weeks × 12 weeks vs. ezetimibe 10 mg: Low | 1 RCT; Atorvastatin 10 mg group: evolocumab N = 110 vs. placebo N = 55 Atorvastatin 80 mg group: evolocumab N = 110 vs. ezetimibe N = 54 | Medium | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Not detected | None | Higher for evolocumab: Atorvastatin 10 mg: 85.8% vs. 5.6%; EPC-calculated RR 5.22 (95% CI, 3.00 to 9.69) Atorvastatin 80 mg: 92.5% vs. 62.3%; EPC calculated RR 1.47 (95% CI, 1.23 to 1.88) |
% change in LDL at 12 weeks | ||||||||
Evolocumab 420 mg Q 4 weeks × 12 weeks vs. ezetimibe 10 mg: Low | 1 RCT; Atorvastatin 10 mg group: evolocumab N = 110 vs. placebo N = 55 Atorvastatin 80 mg group: evolocumab N = 110 vs. ezetimibe N = 54 | Medium | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Not detected | None | Greater for evolocumab: % Change from baseline (95% CI): Atorvastatin 10 mg: -62.5% (95% CI, -66.1 to -58.9) vs. -19.0 (-24.0 to -13.9) Atorvastatin 80 mg: -65.1 (95% CI, -69.8 to -60.3) vs. -21.3 (95% CI, -28.0 to -14.5) |
% change in HDL at 12 weeks | ||||||||
Evolocumab 420 mg Q4 weeks × 12 weeks vs. ezetimibe 10 mg: Insufficient | 1 RCT; Atorvastatin 10 mg group: evolocumab N = 681110 vs. placebo N =55 Atorvastatin 80 mg group: evolocumab N = 110 vs. ezetimibe N = 54 | Medium | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Not detected | None | Greater for evolocumab: % Change from baseline (95% CI): Atorvastatin |10 mg: 7.7 (95% CI, 5.0 to 10.4) vs. -0.9 (95% CI, -4.7 to 2.9) Atorvastatin 80 mg: 7.8 (95% CI, 5.2 to 10.4) vs. -0.6 (95% CI, -4.3 to 3.1) |
Overall adverse events | ||||||||
Evolocumab 420 mg Q 4 weeks × 12 weeks vs. ezetimibe 10 mg: Low | 1 RCT; Atorvastatin 10 mg group: evolocumab N = 110 vs. placebo N = 55 Atorvastatin 80 mg group: evolocumab N = 110 vs. ezetimibe N = 54 | Medium | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Not detected | None | No difference: Atorvastatin 10 mg: 30.9% vs. 40.0% Atorvastatin 80 mg: 39.1% vs. 35.2% |
Withdrawals due to adverse events | ||||||||
Evolocumab 420 mg Q4 weeks × 12 weeks vs. ezetimibe 10 mg: Insufficient | 1 RCT; Atorvastatin 10 mg group: evolocumab N = 110 vs. placebo N = 55 Atorvastatin 80 mg group: evolocumab N = 110 vs. ezetimibe N = 54 | Medium | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Not detected | None | No difference: Atorvastatin 10 mg: 1.8% vs. 0 Atorvastatin 80 mg: 1.8% vs. 1.9% |
Serious adverse events | ||||||||
Evolocumab 420 mg Q4 weeks × 12 weeks vs. ezetimibe 10 mg: Insufficient | 1 RCT; Atorvastatin 10 mg group: evolocumab N = 110 vs. placebo N = 55 Atorvastatin 80 mg group: evolocumab N = 110 vs. ezetimibe N = 54 | Medium | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Not detected | None | No difference; Atorvastatin 10 mg: 1.8% vs. 0 Atorvastatin 80 mg: 0.9% vs. 1.9% |
Specific adverse events: potential injection-site reactionsb | ||||||||
Evolocumab 420 mg Q4 weeks × 12 weeks vs. ezetimibe 10 mg: Insufficient | 1 RCT; Atorvastatin 10 mg group: evolocumab N = 110 vs. placebo N = 55 Atorvastatin 80 mg group: evolocumab N = 110 vs. ezetimibe N = 54 | Medium | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Not detected | None | No difference; Any statin + any evolocumab = 1.3% vs. atorvastatin + ezetimibe = 0.9%; NR for individual ezetimibe or evolocumab groups |
Key Question 4. Statin Intolerant | ||||||||
Evolocumab vs. ezetimibe over 12 weeks (GAUSS: evolocumab 280 mg, 350, or 420 mg given every 4 weeks vs. ezetimibe 10 mg; GAUSS-2: evolocumab 140 mg every two weeks or 420 mg once monthly to ezetimibe 10 mg)17,18 | ||||||||
LDL-C: Low | 2 RCTs, N = 434 | Medium | Direct | Consistent | Imprecise | Undetected | None | Higher reduction for evolocumab: -26% (95% CI, -34.1% to -17.9%) for 280 mg every 4 weeks in GAUSS to -38% (95% CI, -43.7 to -32.4) for 140 mg every 2 weeks in GAUSS-2 |
HDL-C: Low | 2 RCTs, N = 434 | Medium | Direct | Consistent | Imprecise | Undetected | None | Evolocumab has a similar or better % change from baseline: Range = 3.6% (95% CI, -1.5 to 8.6) to 8.5% (P = 0.020) |
Overall AE: Low | 2 RCTs, N = 434 | Medium | Direct | Consistent | Imprecise | Undetected | None | 63% vs. 69%; RR 0.92 (95% CI, 0.80 to 1.06) |
AE withdrawal: Low | 2 RCTs, N = 434 | Medium | Direct | Consistent | Imprecise | Undetected | None | 3% vs. 12%; RR 0.29 (95% CI, 0.14 to 0.63) |
Serious AE: Low | 2 RCTs, N = 434 | Medium | Direct | Consistent | Imprecise | Undetected | None | 3% vs. 3%; RR 1.04 (95% CI, 0.34 to 3.15) |
Neurocognitive dysfunction: Low | 2 RCTs, N = 434 | Medium | Direct | Consistent | Imprecise | Undetected | None | No events |
Injection site: Insufficient | 1 RCT, N = 307 | Medium | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Undetected | None | No difference; 3% vs. 8% |
Evolocumab 420 mg every 4 weeks plus ezetimibe 10 mg versus ezetimibe 10 mg alone x 12 weeks | ||||||||
LDL-C: Low | 1 RCT, N = 62 | Medium | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Undetected | None | Greater reduction: (-47%; 95% CI, -53.7% to -40.8%) |
HDL-C: Insufficient | 1 RCT, N = 62 | Medium | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Undetected | None | Greater increase: (12%; 95% CI, 3.9 to 20.1) |
Overall AE: Insufficient | 1 RCT, N = 62 | Medium | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Undetected | None | 67% vs. 59% |
AE withdrawal: Insufficient | 1 RCT, N = 62 | Medium | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Undetected | None | 3% vs. 6% |
Serious AE: Insufficient | 1 RCT, N = 62 | Medium | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Undetected | None | No events |
Neurocognitive dysfunction: Insufficient | 1 RCT, N = 62 | Medium | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Undetected | None | NR |
Injection site: Insufficient | 1 RCT, N = 62 | Medium | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Undetected | None | NR |
Long-term evidence in mixed populations (OSLER-1 and OSLER-2)16 | ||||||||
Evolocumab 420 mg q 4w (OSLER-1) or 140 mg q 2w or 420 mg q 4w (OSLER-2) + standard therapy vs. standard therapy alone x 48w | ||||||||
LDL-C lowering ability | ||||||||
Evolocumab + standard therapy vs. standard therapy alone: Moderate | RCT: 2 (4,465) | Medium | Direct | Consistent | Precise | Undetected | None | Evolocumab reduced LDL-C by 61% (95% CI, 59 to 63, P < 0.001) at 12w and by 58.4% (95% CI NR, P < 0.001) at 48w as compared to standard therapy |
LDL-C lowering ability: % patients with LDL < 100 or < 70 at 12 weeks | ||||||||
Evolocumab + standard therapy vs. standard therapy alone: Low | RCT: 2 (4,46S) | Medium | Direct | Unknown | Precise | Undetected | None | % patients with LDL reduced to 100 mg/dL or lower (90.2% vs. 26.0%) or 70 mg/dL (73.6% vs. 3.8%) |
HDL-C raising ability | ||||||||
Evolocumab + standard therapy vs. standard therapy alone: Low | RCT: 2 (4,46S) | Medium | Direct | Unknown | Precise | Undetected | None | Change from baseline in HDL-C at 12w was 8.7% in evolocumab group vs. 1.7% in standard therapy alone group (P < 0.001) |
Overall adverse events | ||||||||
Evolocumab + standard therapy vs. standard therapy alone: Low | RCT: 2 (4,46S) | Medium | Direct | Unknown | Precise | Undetected | None | Any AEs occurred in 69.2% of evolocumab group and 64.8% of standard therapy alone group |
Withdrawals due to adverse events | ||||||||
Evolocumab + standard therapy vs. standard therapy alone: Insufficient | RCT: 2 (4,46S) | Medium | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Undetected | None | 2.4% of patients in evolocumab group prematurely discontinued study drug due to AEs (NA for standard therapy group) |
Serious adverse events | ||||||||
Evolocumab + standard therapy vs. standard therapy alone: Low | RCT: 2 (4,46S) | Medium | Direct | Unknown | Precise | Undetected | None | No difference in % of patients with SAEs (7.5% for both groups) |
Specific adverse events: neurocognitive events | ||||||||
Evolocumab + standard therapy vs. standard therapy alone: Insufficient | RCT: 2 (4,46S) | Medium | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Undetected | None | 0.9% in evolocumab group vs. 0.3% in standard therapy group |
Specific adverse events: injection-site reactions | ||||||||
Evolocumab + standard therapy vs. standard therapy alone: Insufficient | RCT: 2 (4,46S) | Medium | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Undetected | None | 4.3% of patients in evolocumab group (NA for standard therapy group) |
Specific adverse events: gastroenteritis | ||||||||
Evolocumab + standard therapy vs. standard therapy alone: Insufficient | RCT: 2 (4,46S) | Medium | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Undetected | None | 1.5% of patients in evolocumab group vs. 0.8% in standard therapy group |
Specific adverse events: cardiovascular events | ||||||||
Evolocumab + standard therapy vs. standard therapy alone: Insufficient | RCT: 2 (4,46S) | Medium | Direct | Unknown | Imprecise | Undetected | None | CV events at 1 year reduced from 2.18% in standard therapy group vs. 0.95% in evolocumab group (HR evolocumab, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.28 to 0.78) |
Note: Numbered footnotes refer to citations listed in References at the end of the appendices.
aIncludes deliria (including confusion), cognitive and attention disorders and disturbances, dementia and amnestic disorders, disturbances in thinking and perception, and mental impairment disorders.
bIncludes injection-site rash, inflammation, pruritus, reaction, or urticaria.
AE = adverse events; CI = confidence interval; CV = cardiovascular; EPC = Evidence-based Practice Center; GI = gastrointestinal; HDL-C = high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HR = hazard ratio; LDL-C = low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol; NA = not available; NR = not reported; NS = not sufficient; RCT = randomized controlled trial; RR = relative risk.