Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep;21(9):10.18553/jmcp.2015.21.9.824. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2015.21.9.824

TABLE 3.

Propensity Score Weight-Adjusted ORs and Associated 95% CIs from Logistic Regression Models,a Persistence and Compliance (Defined with a 60-Day Gap Allowance) with Index Therapy over 12 Months

  Persistence 95% CI Compliance 95% CI
OR Lower Upper OR Lower Upper
Denosumab vs. alendronate 4.17 3.69 4.83 5.88 5.10 6.71
Denosumab vs. ibandronate 4.55 3.85 5.29 6.25 5.21 7.25
Denosumab vs. risedronate 5.56 4.78 6.76 7.69 6.54 9.26
Denosumab vs. raloxifene 3.13 2.61 3.80 4.35 3.52 5.15
Denosumab vs. teriparatide 1.59 1.23 2.04 2.44 1.92 3.17

aModels adjusted for age, health plan type, U.S. Census region, urban residency, patient out-of-pocket expenditure for the index therapy, and the following baseline/preindex clinical characteristics: Charlson Comorbidity Index score; number of unique medications prescribed; and diagnosis of osteoporosis, osteopenia, renal insufficiency, gastrointestinal disorders, coronary heart disease, and osteoporosis-related fracture.

CI = confidence interval; OR = odds ratio.