Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr;25(4):10.18553/jmcp.2018.18308. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.18308

Table 4.

Adjusted Health Care Resource Utilization and Costs During 1-Year Follow-up Among the 3 Treatment Pattern Groupsa

Adjusted All-Cause Outcomes Switchers vs. Nonswitchers Discontinuers vs. Nonswitchers
Health care resource utilization (count outcomes), IRR (95% CI)
  Hospitalizationsb 1.13 (0.84-1.53) 2.05 (1.70-2.48)
  ED visitsb 1.10 (0.93-1.30) 1.50 (1.34-1.68)
  Outpatient visitsc 1.18 (1.16-1.21) 1.01 (1.00-1.03)
Health care costs ($), mean difference (95% CI)d
  Total all-cause health care costs 10,120 (8,235-12,033) –18,611 (-$20,254 to -$17,025)
  Medical costs 2,746 (1,090-4,677) 3,729 (1,970-5,527)
  ED costs 170 (15-341) 298 (198-409)
  Inpatient costs 482 (29-1,470) 2,578 (2,445-2,973)
  Outpatient costs 2,028 (1,470-3,067) 525 (29-1,394)
  Prescription drug costs 8,988 (7,535-10,610) –20,486 (-$21,319 to -$19,636)

aCovariates included age, sex, geographic region, insurance plan type, index drug, index year, baseline Charlson Comorbidity Index, baseline health care resource utilization, baseline total health care costs, and baseline nonbiologic medications.

bHospitalizations and ED visit IRRs were derived from a negative binomial model.

cOutpatient visit IRRs were derived from a Poisson model.

dHealth care costs were modeled using generalized linear regression with a log link and gamma distribution or 2-part models. For 2-part models, logistic regression was used to model probabilities of positive costs followed by gamma regression to model costs among patients with positive costs.

CI = confidence interval; ED = emergency department; IRR = incidence rate ratio.