TABLE 1.
Survival Hazard Ratios | Base Case | Lower | Upper | PSA Distribution | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Second-line PFS hazard ratios vs. LEN-DEX | |||||
CFZ-LEN-DEX | 0.69 | 0.53 | 0.91 | LogNormal | Network meta-analysis |
ELO-LEN-DEX | 0.70 | 0.56 | 1.00 | LogNormal | Network meta-analysis |
IX-LEN-DEX | 0.74 | 0.65 | 1.19 | LogNormal | Network meta-analysis |
DAR-LEN-DEXa | 0.37 | 0.27 | 0.52 | LogNormal | Network meta-analysis |
DAR-BOR-DEXa | 0.39 | 0.28 | 0.53 | LogNormal | Network meta-analysis |
Third-line PFS hazard ratios vs. LEN-DEX | |||||
BOR-DEX | 0.93 | 0.58 | 2.04 | LogNormal | Network meta-analysis |
CFZ-LEN-DEX | 0.69 | 0.54 | 0.87 | LogNormal | Network meta-analysis |
ELO-LEN-DEX | 0.70 | 0.49 | 0.87 | LogNormal | Network meta-analysis |
IX-LEN-DEX | 0.74 | 0.40 | 0.84 | LogNormal | Network meta-analysis |
PAN-BOR-DEX | 0.59 | 0.31 | 1.10 | LogNormal | Network meta-analysis |
DAR-LEN-DEXa | 0.37 | 0.27 | 0.52 | LogNormal | Network meta-analysis |
DAR-BOR-DEXa | 0.39 | 0.28 | 0.53 | LogNormal | Network meta-analysis |
Hazard ratio for OS vs. PFS | 0.41 | 0.31 | 0.58 | LogNormal | 24 |
Quality of Life | Base Case | Lower | Upper | PSA Distribution | Source |
Second-line health state utilities | |||||
Progression-free, on treatment | 0.82 | 0.78 | 0.88 | Beta | Data on fileb |
Progression-free, off treatment | 0.84 | 0.82 | 0.97 | Beta | Data on fileb |
Progressed disease | 0.65 | 0.62 | 0.74 | Beta | Data on fileb |
Third-line health state utilities | |||||
Progression-free, on treatment | 0.65 | 0.52 | 0.78 | Beta | 25 |
Progression-free, off treatment | 0.72 | 0.58 | 0.86 | Beta | 37 |
Progressed disease | 0.61 | 0.49 | 0.73 | Beta | 25 |
Adverse event disutility | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.08 | Beta | 25 |
Costs | Base Case | Lower | Upper | PSA Distribution | Source |
Drug acquisition and administration costs,c $ | |||||
Bortezomib 3.5 mg vial | 1,503.00 | 1,202.40 | 1,803.60 | Normal | RED BOOK |
Bortezomib administration | 111.42 | 89.14 | 133.70 | Normal | CPT 96409 |
Carfilzomib 60 mg vial | 1,971.50 | 1,577.20 | 2,365.80 | Normal | RED BOOK |
Carfilzomib administration | 209.24 | 167.39 | 251.09 | Normal | CPT 96360, 96361, 96413 |
Dexamethasone per mg | 0.32 | 0.26 | 0.39 | Normal | RED BOOK |
Elotuzumab 300 mg vial | 1,776.00 | 1,420.80 | 2,131.20 | Normal | RED BOOK |
Elotuzumab 400 mg vial | 2,368.00 | 1,894.40 | 2,841.60 | Normal | RED BOOK |
Elotuzumab administration | 227.87 | 182.30 | 273.44 | Normal | CPT 96413, 96415, 96417 |
Ixazomib capsule | 3,006.00 | 2,404.80 | 3,607.20 | Normal | RED BOOK |
Lenalidomide capsule | 552.98 | 442.38 | 663.58 | Normal | RED BOOK |
Panobinostat capsule | 1,222.22 | 977.78 | 1,466.67 | Normal | RED BOOK |
Daratumumab 400 mg vial | 1,850.40 | 1,480.32 | 2,220.48 | Normal | RED BOOK |
Daratumumab 100 mg vial | 462.60 | 370.08 | 555.12 | Normal | RED BOOK |
Daratumumab administration | 399.83 | 319.86 | 479.80 | Normal | CPT 96413, 96415, 96417 |
Health State Cost per Week | Progression-Free AE Prophylaxis, $ | Progressed Disease Treatment, $ | |||
LEN-DEX | 22.00 | 427.45 | |||
CFZ-LEN-DEX | 104.73 | 367.30 | |||
ELO-LEN-DEX | 85.37 | 369.26 | |||
IX-LEN-DEX | 85.26 | 377.05 | |||
PAN-BOR-DEX | 39.16 | 337.41 | |||
DAR-LEN-DEX | 49.45 | 273.54 | |||
DAR-BOR-DEX | 90.71 | 283.94 |
aDAR hazard ratios were assessed for a general population and were assumed to be equivalent in second- and third-line settings.
bAmgen. Data provided in response to ICER data request. QOL/Utility Data from ASPIRE Cost Effectiveness Model. February 22, 2016.
cCosts assessed March 2016.
BOR = bortezomib; CFZ = carfilzomib; CPT = Current Procedural Terminology; DAR = daratumumab; DEX = dexamethasone; ELO = elotuzumab; IX = ixazomib; LEN = lenalidomide; OS = overall survival; PAN = panobinostat; PFS = progression-free survival; PSA = probabilistic sensitivity analysis.