Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar;22(3):10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.3.305. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.3.305

TABLE 2.

Comparison of Physician-Perceived and Actual Percentage of Adherent Patients Across Part D Medications

Part D Medications Physician-Perceived Percentage of
Adherent Patients, n (%)a n = 226
Actual Percentage of
Adherent Patients by Physician, n (%)b n = 226
Average PDC Valuesd n = 226
< 50%c 50%-75% > 75% < 50% 50%-75%c > 75%
Statins 19 (8.4) 119 (52.6) 88 (38.9) 11 (4.8) 134 (59.2) 81 (35.8) 84.0 (±4.7)
OADs 17 (7.5) 82 (12.1) 127 (56.1) 7 (3.0) 100 (44.2) 119 (52.6) 86.6 (±5.3)
RAS antagonists 12 (5.3) 82 (36.2) 132 (58.4) 3 (0.01) 99 (43.8) 124 (54.8) 86.2 (±3.8)

Note: There was no statistically significant difference between the perceived and actual percentage of adherent patients within each Part D medication.

aReported by physicians in the survey; perceived percentage of adherent patients varied significantly (chi-square test = 21.33, P < 0.05) between the Part D medications.

bCalculated from pharmacy claims of patients with each of the physicians; actual percentage of adherent patients varied significantly (chi-square test = 21.96, P < 0.05) between the Part D medications.

cCategories < 25% and 25%-49% were combined because of low percentage of adherent patients in those categories.

dAverage PDC values were calculated using the sum of PDC values for the patients divided by the number of patients (PDC calculated from pharmacy claims data).

OADs = oral antidiabetic drugs; PDC = proportion of days covered; RAS = renin-angiotensin system.