Table 3.
Views related to Goal 3 Workforce management
| All staff | Most staff | Some staff | No staff | DNK | ||
| n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | ||
|
HMs (n=146) |
Districts had job descriptions | 21 (14.38) | 40 (27.40) | 53 (36.30) | 8 (5.48) | 24 (16.44) |
| Districts had training plans | 14 (9.59) | 38 (26.03) | 59 (40.41) | 11 (7.53) | 24 (16.44) | |
| Districts had career plans | 11 (7.53) | 35 (23.97) | 61 (41.78) | 14 (9.59) | 25 (17.12) | |
| Districts had staff assessment systems | 15 (10.27) | 37 (25.34) | 62 (42.47) | 10 (6.85) | 22 (15.07) | |
| Districts had staff rotation systems | 11 (7.53) | 31 (21.23) | 67 (45.89) | 12 (8.22) | 25 (17.12) | |
| Hospitals had job descriptions | 10 (6.85) | 39 (26.71) | 63 (43.15) | 4 (2.74) | 30 (20.55) | |
| Hospitals had training plans | 7 (4.79) | 37 (25.34) | 67 (45.89) | 8 (5.48) | 27 (18.49) | |
| Hospitals had career plans | 7 (4.79) | 32 (21.92) | 70 (47.95) | 9 (6.16) | 28 (19.18) | |
| Hospitals had staff assessment | 6 (4.11) | 35 (23.97) | 73 (50.00) | 6 (4.11) | 26 (17.81) | |
| Hospitals had staff rotation systems | 5 (3.42) | 37 (25.34) | 74 (50.68) | 4 (2.74) | 26 (17.81) | |
|
| ||||||
| Yes | No | DNK | ||||
| n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | ||||
|
| ||||||
| Hospitals had up-to-date staff status reports | 33 (22.60) | 6 (4.11) | 107 (73.29) | |||
| Performance agreements of all the staff in HM's institution up-to-date |
59 (40.41) | 21 (14.38) | 66 (45.21) | |||
| Morale of staff in HM's institution is assessed | 48 (32.88) | 37 (25.34) | 61 (41.78) | |||
|
| ||||||
| All staff | Most staff | Some staff | No staff | DNK | ||
| n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | ||
|
| ||||||
|
CRs (n=78) |
Morale of the staff is always checked | 26 (33.33) | 13 (16.67) | 11 (14.10) | 13 (16.67) | 15 (19.23) |
CR, community representative; DNK, do not know; HM, health manager; n, number