Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul;118:102484. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2023.102484

Table 3.

Impacts on nutrition knowledge, agriculture knowledge and adoption of improved agricultural production practices, by sex.

(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
Nutrition knowledge, percent correct
Agriculture knowledge, percent correct
Any adoption, improved agricultural practices
Number, improved agricultural practices
Nutrition knowledge, percent correct
Agriculture knowledge, percent correct
Any adoption, improved agricultural practices
Number, improved agricultural practices
Women Men
Treatments
T(SAAO) 3.257*** 4.608*** 0.094*** 0.502*** 4.894*** 7.351*** 0.244*** 0.868***
(0.663) (1.201) (0.031) (0.159) (0.698) (1.078) (0.037) (0.157)
T(APK) 4.162*** 3.434*** 0.075*** 0.274** 4.240*** 6.312*** 0.182*** 0.711***
(0.671) (1.007) (0.026) (0.112) (0.781) (0.973) (0.037) (0.158)
P values on equality of treatments
T(SAAO) = T(APK) 0.21 0.33 0.56 0.19 0.38 0.29 0.13 0.34
Mean, Control group 80.1 51.2 0.27 0.85 71.5 53.7 0.20 0.71
Observations 2,060 2,069 2,061 2,061 1,638 1,929 1,929 1,929
R-squared 0.167 0.266 0.223 0.233 0.198 0.255 0.199 0.189

Notes: Estimates are intent-to-treat from OLS models. Standard errors adjusted for clustering at block level are in parentheses. *p < 0.10; **p < 0.05; ***p < 0.01. All specifications include as independent variables the treatment indicators, baseline values for the outcome variable (except for those outcomes relating to agricultural knowledge and practice) and the following control variables: age and sex of household head, mean education levels of males and females 18 and older, number of adults, dependency ratio, wealth index, land owned at baseline, fishpond owned at baseline, baseline access to information as measured by (baseline) number of mobile phones owned, ownership of television, received extension visit for crop production, received extension visit for livestock or fish production, household has access to electricity, and baseline upazila.