The U.S. National Academies report on Environmental Engineering for the 21st Century identified five grand challenges of sustainably supplying food, water, and energy; curbing climate change and adapting to its impacts; designing a future without pollution and waste; creating efficient, healthy, resilient cities; and fostering informed decisions and actions.1 Addressing many of the grand challenges will require embracing the intersections of environmental science, engineering, and geosciences. These three fields are inherently interdisciplinary, and they naturally intersect with each other (Figure 1). Geosciences, or Earth sciences, study the dynamics of different spheres of Earth. One of its missions is to detect the availability of mineral, water, and fuel resources, for sustainable development,2,3 and new research opportunities were identified in “coevolution of life, environment, and climate” and “biogeochemical and water cycles in terrestrial environments and impacts of global change” by the U.S. National Research Council.2 Environmental science and engineering focus on the spheres that intersect with human activities. Environmental science puts an emphasis on understanding the migration of naturally occurring and anthropogenic contaminants in the environment and their impact on ecosystem and human health, and environmental engineering centers on developing technologies for water supply, mineral exploration, and environmental remediation to mitigate adverse impacts.1
Figure 1.

Embracing a geoscience perspective in environmental research.
For the environmental science, geoscience, and engineering communities, we posit that it is important to recognize three themes that are particularly intertwined: (1) addressing climate change and the associated risks to our water and energy systems, (2) exploring and supplying critical raw materials that are needed for future clean and renewable energy, and (3) protecting water quality and human health.
Co-design of waste management and energy systems has long been practiced by environmental engineers in pursuing carbon neutrality and mitigating climate change. Additionally, the transition to alternative energy sources and development and implementation of carbon removal technologies have emerged as areas of growth within the environmental science and technology community.4 These are research challenges for which a geoscience perspective is valuable for the development of geo-based solutions. Relevant research topics include exploration of alternative energy sources (e.g., geothermal) and critical materials for renewable energy technologies, development of subsurface energy storage systems (e.g., underground storage of hydrogen gas), environmental impact assessment of fossil fuel-based energy systems (e.g., hydraulic fracturing, produced water from oil and gas, and management of coal fly ash), and advancement of geologically based carbon sequestration approaches involving subsurface storage and enhanced rock weathering.5
To protect water quality, remediation of groundwater contamination is an important task, which requires the predictive understanding of the fate and transport of emerging anthropogenic pollutants and geogenic contaminants. These are also traditional research priorities of hydrogeology and geochemistry,6 including studies specifically focused on the critical zone.7 We anticipate that by joining hands with these geoscience branches, the environmental science and engineering communities will generate new opportunities to measure, monitor, and predict the spatial–temporal patterns of various contaminants and thus to accelerate the development and implementation of efficient remediation/treatment technologies.
In accordance with the shared interests in tackling climate change and protecting human health, it is beneficial for the environmental science and engineering communities to expand the research foci from conventional contaminants to include energy-relevant materials or the byproducts of conventional and emerging energy technologies (e.g., CO2 and rare earth elements), to fully assess the anthropogenic impacts on our environment for sustainable development. Given the magnitude of the challenges, it is also important to connect scales from the laboratory to not only the field but also the global framework in an effort to devise impactful solutions. One such example is investigation of global cycling of elements that are at the center of emerging energy and transportation technologies.8
The intersections of geosciences, environmental science, and engineering are also manifested in increasingly shared research methodology. For instance, shared facilities such as synchrotron beamlines have developed capabilities to handle geological and environmental samples and have seen growing applications in Earth and environmental sciences. Furthermore, some methods that were developed originally in geosciences have been increasingly adopted by the environmental community. One example is reactive transport modeling, which provides physics-based reproduction and prediction of coupled biogeochemical and physical processes. This approach has been widely used in various Earth systems,9 and it can also be applied to address the environmental challenges of the 21st century. Reactive transport modeling is particularly useful in tracing the partitioning and fate of chemicals in different environments, integrating laboratory mechanistic observations with truthful representation of the actual environments, and predicting system dynamics at temporal and spatial scales that may otherwise be infeasible. Another example is the use of isotope tracers as environmental indicators that enhance our understanding of the fate and transport of geogenic and anthropogenic pollutants. The advancement of mass spectroscopy has led to the expansion of isotope geochemistry from the analysis of traditional light isotopes (e.g., C, O, and S) to nontraditional metal stable isotopes,10,11 opening up entirely new opportunities to determine the sources and pathways of heavy metals in the environment. Investigation of the isotope signatures and isotope fractionation in various environmental processes has become an emerging field that bridges geosciences and environmental science.
Environmental Science & Technology has had a history of embracing the intersections of geosciences, environmental science, and engineering, publishing interdisciplinary studies with strong environmental relevance and implications.12 A decade ago Environmental Science & Technology published work that could be considered as fundamental geochemistry. As the landscape of peer-reviewed journals has expanded, including the launches of ACS Earth and Space Chemistry and ACS ES&T Water, there are more venues for sharing results that are primarily of geochemical or geological interest. Within this expanded landscape, we see the role of Environmental Science & Technology in evaluating and publishing research at the intersection of environmental science, engineering, and geosciences being as important as ever. The themes and tools that we have described are rich with examples of work that yields new scientific insights and has important environmental implications.
The evolution of environmental research is accompanied by integrating knowledge from different disciplines. As Professor James Morgan reflected in the memorial tribute to Professor Werner Stumm, “for protection of aquatic systems, Stumm urged an ecosystem perspective for all aquatic systems”.13 We argue that in light of today’s challenges, it is also important to embrace a geoscience perspective in our environmental research.
Biographies

Hang Deng is an assistant professor at the College of Engineering and an adjunct professor at the Institute of Energy and Institute of Carbon Neutrality, Peking University. Hang received her Bachelor’s degrees in Science and Arts from Peking University in 2009 and her Ph.D. degree from the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Princeton University in 2015. Afterward, she worked in Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory’s Earth and Environmental Sciences Area, first as a postdoctoral fellow and then as an Earth research scientist. Her research focuses on fundamental multiphysics and multiscale problems that underlie a variety of applications, including geologic carbon storage, enhanced weathering in soils, CO2 mineralization, and enhanced geothermal systems. Hang’s recent research centers around reactive transport processes of various fluids and chemicals in fractured and porous media across scales, e.g., co-precipitation of calcium carbonate with heavy metals and pore-scale interactions between multiphase flow and geochemical reactions. She currently serves on the editorial board of the Journal of Contaminant Hydrology and the Inaugural Early Career Advisory Board of Environmental Science & Technology.

Professor Daniel Giammar is the Walter E. Browne Professor of Environmental Engineering in the Department of Energy, Environmental and Chemical Engineering at Washington University in St. Louis. In July 2022, he became the inaugural director of the Washington University Center for the Environment. Professor Giammar’s research focuses on chemical reactions that affect the fate and transport of heavy metals, radionuclides, and other inorganic constituents in natural and engineered aquatic systems. His recent work has investigated the removal of selenium, arsenic, and chromium from drinking water, control of the corrosion of lead pipes, geologic carbon sequestration, and biogeochemical processes for remediation of uranium-contaminated sites. Giammar is currently an Associate Editor of Environmental Science & Technology. Professor Giammar completed his B.S. at Carnegie Mellon University, M.S. and Ph.D. at Caltech, and postdoctoral training at Princeton University before joining Washington University in St. Louis in 2002. He is a registered professional engineer in the State of Missouri.

Wei Li is a professor of geochemistry in the School of Earth Sciences & Engineering at Nanjing University. He received a B.S. (2003) in environmental science from Wuhan University (China), an M.S. (2006) in environmental chemistry at the Research Center of Eco-Environmental Sciences of Chinese Academy of Sciences, and a Ph.D. (2010) in geochemistry from the State University of New York at Stony Brook. He was a postdoctoral fellow at the University of Delaware, with Prof. Donald Sparks. His research focuses primarily on mineral–water interfacial geochemistry and the application of fundamental principles and novel techniques of geochemistry to soil remediation and water decontamination. Projects include exploring the mechanism of transition metal precipitation on clay and Al oxide surfaces using quick-scanning EXAFS and metal stable isotopes, the use of limestone minerals and clay minerals for metal sequestration for contaminated soils in southern China, and designing new materials for fluoride removal. He is also interested in studying soil phosphorus chemistry using both 31P liquid-state and solid-state NMR spectroscopy. He has published 89 papers in peer-reviewed journals such as Nature Geoscience, Nature Communications, Environmental Science & Technology, and Geochemical Cosmochimical Acta.

Avner Vengosh is a Distinguished Professor and Nicholas Chair of Environmental Quality and the new Chair of the Division of Earth and Climate Sciences at Nicholas School of the Environment at Duke University. Professor Vengosh and his team have studied the energy–water nexus, developing novel geochemical and isotopic tracers for and conducting pioneer research on sources and mechanisms of water contamination, and evaluations of potential risks for human health in the United States and numerous countries across the globe. Currently, his team is engaged in studying phosphate rock geochemistry and the impact of fertilizers on soil and water quality, unconventional sources of critical raw materials, and potential environmental effects of lithium mining. He is a Fellow of the Geological Society of America (GSA) and International Association of Geochemistry (IAGC). In 2019, 2020, and 2021, he was recognized as one of the Web of Science Highly Cited Researchers. He serves as an Editor of GeoHealth and on the editorial board of Environmental Science & Technology. He has published 171 scientific papers in leading international journals. His recent cross-disciplinary book Water Quality Impacts of the Energy-Water Nexus (Cambridge University Press, 2022) provides an integrated assessment of the different scientific and policy tools around the energy–water nexus.
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
References
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, Medicine. Engineering, Medicine, Environmental Engineering for the 21st Century: Addressing Grand Challenges; The National Academies Press: Washington, DC, 2019; p 124. [Google Scholar]
- National Research Council . New Research Opportunities in the Earth Sciences; The National Academies Press: Washington, DC, 2012; p 132. [Google Scholar]
- Stewart I. Geology for the wellbeing economy. Nature Geoscience 2023, 16 (2), 106–107. 10.1038/s41561-022-01110-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zhu J.-J.; Dressel W.; Pacion K.; Ren Z. J. ES&T in the 21st century: A data-driven analysis of research topics, Interconnections, and trends in the past 20 years. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021, 55 (6), 3453–3464. 10.1021/acs.est.0c07551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Haque F.; Santos R. M.; Chiang Y. W. Urban farming with enhanced rock weathering as a prospective climate stabilization wedge. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021, 55 (20), 13575–13578. 10.1021/acs.est.1c04111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Deng H.; Li L.; Kim J. J.; Ling F. T.; Beckingham L. E.; Wammer K. H. Bridging environmental geochemistry and hydrology. Journal of Hydrology 2022, 613, 128448. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128448. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Banwart S. A.; Chorover J.; Gaillardet J.; Sparks D.; White T.; Anderson S.; Aufdenkampe A.; Bernasconi S.; Brantley S.; Chadwick O.; Dietrich W. E.; Duffy C.; Goldhaber M.; Lehnert K.; Nikolaidis N.; Ragnarsdottir K.. Sustaining Earth’s Critical Zone Basic Science and Interdisciplinary Solutions for Global Challenges. 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Elshkaki A. Sustainability of emerging energy and transportation technologies is impacted by the coexistence of minerals in nature. Communications Earth & Environment 2021, 2 (1), 186. 10.1038/s43247-021-00262-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Steefel C. I.; DePaolo D. J.; Lichtner P. C. Reactive transport modeling: An essential tool and a new research approach for the Earth sciences. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 2005, 240 (3–4), 539–558. 10.1016/j.epsl.2005.09.017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wiederhold J. G. Metal stable isotope signatures as tracers in environmental geochemistry. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49 (5), 2606–2624. 10.1021/es504683e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li W.; Gou W.; Li W.; Zhang T.; Yu B.; Liu Q.; Shi J. Environmental applications of metal stable isotopes: Silver, mercury and zinc. Environmental pollution 2019, 252, 1344–1356. 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.06.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zimmerman J. B. Forward Together. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 54 (8), 4697. 10.1021/acs.est.0c01893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- National Academies of Engineering. Memorial Tributes: Volume 10; The National Academies Press: Washington, DC, 2002; p 225. [Google Scholar]
