Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 20;14:1211034. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1211034

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Bimanual force control performances across three tDCS protocols. (A) Force accuracy, (B) force variability, (C) force symmetry, (D) bilateral motor synergies, (E) good variability, and (F) bad variability. Box plot show individual data (black circles), mean (X sign in the box), median (black horizontal line in the box), interquartile range (IQR = Q3-Q1; top and bottom of the box indicates Q3, and Q1), maximum value: Q1 + 1.5 × IQR, and minimum value: Q1–1.5 × IQR. Asterisk (*) denotes a significant difference between the Bi-AA and Sham tDCS protocol.