Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 11;22(3):100–108. doi: 10.12779/dnd.2023.22.3.100

Table 2. Effects of GV1001 on the total score of SIB and subscales in FAS and PPS.

Variable Week LS mean of CFB (± SE)
FAS PPS
GV1001 1.12 mg (n=28) Placebo (n=27) p-value GV1001 1.12 mg (n=25) Placebo (n=26) p-value
SIB, total 12 0.74±1.42 −3.65±1.45* 0.031 1.00±1.49 −4.04±1.47* 0.016
24 −0.33±2.11 −6.93±2.09* 0.026 −0.12±2.13 −7.23±2.09* 0.017
Social interaction 12 −0.29±0.15 −0.25±0.16 0.865 −0.11±0.16 0.11±0.15 0.317
24 −0.1±0.22 −0.42±0.22 0.314 0.05±0.18 0.18±0.18 0.603
Memory 12 0.55±0.47 −0.85±0.48* 0.037 0.55±0.51 −0.88±0.5* 0.047
24 0.24±0.53 −0.70±0.53 0.210 0.23±0.54 −0.72±0.53 0.210
Orientation 12 −0.02±0.18 −0.35±0.18 0.199 −0.01±0,19 −0.33±0.19 0.245
24 0.14±0.22 −0.42±0.21 0.067 0.15±0.22 −0.41±0.22 0.074
Language 12 0.37±0.74 −1.31±0.75 0.111 0.48±0.79 −1.53±0.77 0.069
24 0.04±0.98 −3.26±0.97* 0.017 0.12±1.00 −3.42±0.98* 0.011
Attention 12 0.04±0.25 −0.2±0.25 0.503 0.09±0.26 −0.28±0.25 0.304
24 −0.34±0.28 −0.26±0.28 0.823 −0.31±0.28 −0.32±0.28 0.976
Praxis 12 0.09±0.2 −0.38±0.20 0.101 0.09±0.21 −0.36±0.2 0.121
24 −0.19±0.27 −0.95±0.27* 0.047 −0.19±0.27 −0.93±0.27 0.050
Visuospatial ability 12 −0.01±0.26 −0.17±0.27 0.672 −0.01±0.29 −0.14±0.29 0.757
24 0.19±0.38 −0.77±0.38 0.074 0.19±0.39 −0.76±0.38 0.083
Construction 12 −0.02±0.17 −0.08±0.17 0.792 −0.03±0.19 −0.12±0.18 0.740
24 −0.19±0.18 −0.1±0.17 0.735 −0.19±0.18 −0.12±0.18 0.770
Orientation to name 12 0.04±0.06 −0.08±0.06 0.140 0.04±0.06 −0.08±0.06 0.150
24 −0.08±0.07 −0.08±0.07 0.964 −0.08±0.07 −0.08±0.07 0.959

p-value for the differences between the GV1001 and placebo groups. The differences between the treatment and placebo groups were assessed using the mixed-effects model for repeated measures analysis.

SIB: Severe Impairment Battery, FAS: full analysis set, PPS: per-protocol set, LS: least square, CFB: change from baseline, SE: standard error.

*p<0.05.