Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 3;14:4655. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-40349-z

Table 2.

Evaluation of efficacy of neoadjuvant Afatinib (n = 47)

Variables No. of patient (%)
Duration of NAT, cycle (range) 2.7 (1-9)
Surgery performed 33 (70.2)
Tumor response
PR 33 (70.2)
SD 11 (23.4)
PD 2 (4.3)
No Re-evaluation 1 (2.1)
ORR (%) 70.2
DCR (%) 93.6
MTD regression, % (range) 36.0 (−28–78)
cN downstaging 37 (78.7)
ypN downstaging # 19 (57.6)
ypTNM #
0/I 14 (42.4)
II 5 (15.2)
III 14 (42.4)
Type of surgery #
Thoracotomy 16 (48.5)
VATS 17 (51.5)
Surgical resection #
Lobectomy 28 (84.8)
Bi-Lobectomy 5 (15.2)
Resection #
R0 29 (87.9)
R1 1 (3.0)
R2 3 (9.1)
Residual tumor cell, % (range) # 57.3 (0-95)
Residual tumor cell ≤ 60% # 17 (51.5)
Pathologic regression #
pCR 1 (3.0)
MPR 3 (9.1)
Non-MPR 30 (90.9)
Mean operation time (hour) 2.4
Mean blood loss (mL) 100
Mean hospital stay postoperatively, day (range) 6.6
Mean chest drainage time, day (range) 12.5

#: Patients received neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery.

DCR disease control rate, MPR major pathological response, MTD maximum tumor dimension, NAT neoadjuvant Afatinib treatment, ORR objective response rate, pCR pathological complete response, PD progressive disease, PR partial response, SD stable disease.