Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 1;29(9):2608–2620. doi: 10.1111/cns.14200

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Amplitude and frequency changes of spIPSC among CON, CUMS, and EA groups. (A) Representative samples of spIPSC from each group. (B, C) The accumulative percentage and comparison of spIPSC amplitude among CON, CUMS, and EA groups. (D, E) The accumulative percentage of spIPSC inter‐event interval and comparison of spIPSC frequency among CON, CUMS, and EA groups. Data were presented as mean ± standard error of the mean (n = 4). No significant difference was detected among the amplitude and frequency comparison of CON, CUMS, and EA groups (spIPSC amplitude: F = 0.495, p = 0.615. spIPSC frequency: F = 0.064, p = 0.939. All df = 2). CUMS, chronic unpredictable mild stress; EA, electroacupuncture; spIPSC, spontaneous inhibitory postsynaptic current.