Abstract
A condition of exposure to multiple stressors resulting in a mixed clinical picture spanning conventional categories without meeting any of them in full, encompasses a risk for a list of comorbidities preventing appropriate prevention and treatment. New transformative transdiagnostic approaches suggest changes spanning conventional categories. They base their systems of classification on biomarkers as well as on brain structural and functional dysregulation as associated with behavioral and emotional symptoms. These new approaches received critiques for not being specific enough and for suggesting a few biomarkers for psychopathology as a whole. Therefore, they put the value of differential diagnosis at risk of avoiding appropriate derived prevention and treatment. Multiplicity of stressors has been considered mostly during and following catastrophes, without considering the resulting mixed clinical picture and life event concomitant stressors. We herewith suggest a new category within the conventional classification systems: The Complex Stress Reaction Syndrome, for a condition of multiplicity of stressors, which showed a mixed clinical picture for daily life in the post coronavirus disease 2019 era, in the general population. We argue that this condition may be relevant to daily, regular life, across the lifespan, and beyond conditions of catastrophes. We further argue that this condition may worsen without professional care and it may develop into a severe mental health disorder, more costly to health systems and the suffering individuals. Means for derived prevention and treatment are discussed.
Keywords: Transdiagnostic, Multiple stressors, Clinical picture, Prevention, Treatment, Interpersonal psychotherapy, Cognitive behavioral therapy
Core Tip: Multiplicity of stressors has been considered mostly during and following catastrophes, without considering the resulting mixed clinical picture and life event concomitant stressors. We herewith suggest a new category within the conventional classification systems: The Complex Stress Reaction Syndrome, for a condition of multiplicity of stressors, which showed a mixed clinical picture for daily life in the post coronavirus disease 2019 era, in the general population. We argue that this condition may be relevant to daily, regular life, across the lifespan, and beyond conditions of catastrophes.
INTRODUCTION
Many people with mental health complaints present a mixed clinical picture. Often none of the complaints meet the full criteria of any of the conventional classifications. Possibly, several categories are met (though not completely), leading to a list of comorbidities. This precludes clear diagnosis, prevention and treatment.
There are at least 4 different suggestions to revise classical classifications into transdiagnostic approaches: Hierarchical Taxonomy to Psychopathology[1], Research Domain Criteria[2], Bipolar-Schizophrenia Network on intermediate phenotypes[3,4], and Neuroscience-Based Nomenclature[5]. These suggested new classification systems are based on neuroanatomic findings showing that several brain areas demonstrate similar functionality and structure in various conventional categories[6-9]. However, others have commented on these data that they lack specificity, as the biomarkers show relevance over too many mental disorders[10]. Thus, many current conventional classification categories are gathered in the transformative systems into one pool of psychopathology, preventing consequent application of accurate prevention and treatment per each disorder including the missing clinical attention to individual differences.
Part of the mixed clinical pictures involves the concomitant experience of multiple stressors. As it arises from our literature search using PubMed, Google Scholar and Reference Citation Analysis (RCA), the impact of multiple stressors has been discussed by cutting edge papers mostly in the context of disasters such as hurricanes, floods, wars and in drastic conditions experienced by refugees and immigrants including the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) era, with similarities between the impacts in these types of conditions across the lifespan, e.g.[11-14]. The most common psychiatric outcomes reported are post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression[15-20]. There are scarce reports on multiple stressors in daily life as related to the development of psychiatric disorders. Some of these reports relate to stressors in the workplace, economic hardships and the impact of urbanization[21-23]. Surprisingly, here also PTSD and depression are the common outcomes. The diagnosis of these two disorders in such different types of multiple stressors calls for attention and re-evaluation. Thus, the aim of the current paper is to suggest a new potential category for the conventional diagnostic system, which will include conditions of mixed clinical pictures with more than one stressor identified.
As clinicians, we encountered a condition in which many patients showed mixed symptomatology, spanning conventional categories, without fully meeting all the conventional criteria of any of these categories during the multi-stressor COVID-19 outbreak. Our literature review supported our observations[24]. In a following empirical bi-national study, using representative, large samples[25], we further found that combinations of several mental health symptoms studied, PTSD, phobia, depression, anxiety and posttraumatic stress symptoms, were more prevalent than combinations of fewer symptoms, with no majorities-minorities differences in both Italy and Israel[25]. We termed this mixed clinical picture the Complex Stress Reaction Syndrome (CSRS). CSRS includes type A (a psychiatric part) and type B (a neuropsychiatric part for the long-COVID component, excluding systemic symptoms)[24,25]. As more cross-cultural studies of the CSRS are warranted, we are currently conducting such an international study with participants from 8 diverse countries located in the Middle East, Europe, Australia and North America.
In this paper we suggest that the CSRS type A (the psychiatric part, not including type B) may explain mixed clinical pictures in conditions of multiplicity of significant stressful life events in the post-COVID era. Thus, we argue that in the general population, experiencing concomitant multiplicity of life events-related stressors may account for the development of a mixed type of mental health disorder, not only in conditions of catastrophes (see Figure 1).
Figure 1.
Accumulated stressors in daily life are associated with a mixed clinical picture in the general population. CSRS: Complex Stress Reaction Syndrome.
Differential diagnosis
For differential diagnosis, the CSRS (type A) may be compared to: (1) Diagnosis of adjustment disorder rules out PTSD and bereavement, and it displays a short stressor onset-symptoms occurrence latency; (2) PTSD diagnosis includes exposure to one frightening stressor; (3) Obsessional thoughts are ego-syntonic by definition. The behaviors related to extrinsic stressors are clearly not included in the obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) conventional category; (4) Diagnosis of acute stress disorder implies a simpler stressor and a specific symptom response; (5) The criteria for defining generalized anxiety disorder list excessive worrying (on diverse issues) and shifting back and forth among them, thus not implying the multiplicity of stressors and a mixed clinical picture; (6) The diagnosis of major depression disorder includes anhedonia, low affect, psychomotor agitation, unfitting guilt feelings, diminished drive and energy, trouble concentrating, and indecisiveness with no other types of symptomatology which are included in a mixed clinical picture; and (7) C-PTSD is described as the result of a series of traumatic events, which is repetitive and hard to escape but does not include a mixed clinical picture beyond the PTSD conventional criteria. It also describes a series of events and not the simultaneous occurrence of multiple stressors as the possible etiological source for psychopathology.
Prevention
The impact of multiple concomitant stressors depends on individual subjective perception and stress reaction tendencies[26]. The immediate question is what can prevent the emergence of pathological stress reactions, spanning several conventional categories. In a previous study we found that close relationships may protect the individual across the types of psychopathology investigated, spanning anxiety, depression, PTSD and OCD criteria, in conditions of multiple stressors[27]. The means for illness prevention and enhanced coping are therefore suggested as keeping close relationships active. Public and media educational programs for conditions of multiplicity of life stressful events with transdiagnostic potential consequences, aimed at enhancing individual resilience by utilization of social networks, are herewith suggested, evidence-based[27,28].
Treatment
We suggest a combined treatment approach of interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT) and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), two evidence-based and cost-effective methods, designed as short-term therapies and found to be equally effective to medications[29] in comparative studies[30,31]. Enhanced close relationships by techniques of problematic interpersonal relations analysis, resolution and role playing adapted from IPT[32], may increase emotional tolerance to accumulating stress emerging from concomitant origins. Our suggested combined psychotherapeutic approach also requires the blending of CBT separate protocols, including techniques for stress reduction and correction of cognitive distortions, rather than following one protocol separately or as recently suggested, one mandatory unified protocol for all types of symptomology[33-36].
We suggested previously that when exposed to multiplicity of stressors, the lack of clear goals implies the diffusion of actions[37]. This could be a risk factor for effective treatment of patients confronted with this type of condensed stressful experience. To overcome this risk and also to respect individual differences, a patient-specific and session-specific therapeutic strategy of assigning clear goals for adaptive coping is warranted, rather than working through a reparation condition or just attempting to eliminate the identified external stressors.
DISCUSSION
The origins of CSRS
The CSRS emerged from the robust transdiagnostic clinical pictures during and following the pandemic[38]. The World Health Organization indicates a prevalence of 22% of a mixed picture including depression, anxiety, PTSD, and general distress, fatigue, irritability and anger in the general population following the experience of war or natural disaster[39]. Transdiagnostic approaches to classifications were proposed even prior to the COVID-19 pandemic[1-4]. Here we argue that the impact of multiple stressors in daily life is a neglected issue in traditional classifications.
What was probably different about the COVID-19 pandemic compared to previous catastrophes was its global scale and the fact that it was covered extensively by the social, electronic, and print media. This factor may be regarded as an additional stressor in daily life beyond disasters. Whether media use is a source of social support, especially for young people[27,40,41] or a daily life stressor in the form of bombardment of information[42], is still a topic under scientific debate and probably age-related with large inter-individual variance.
Although there is enough evidence to suggest that the mental health of the population deteriorated following the pandemic[43], there are suggestions that the extent of deterioration was less than anticipated[44,45]. In any case, epidemiological studies have shown that anxiety, depression, functional somatic, and even obsessional symptoms can coexist at the population or the community level[38,46,47], supporting our transdiagnostic views and the CSRS.
Inclusion of long COVID symptoms in the CSRS may create the same psychological vs physical dispute that we have witnessed with chronic fatigue syndrome or myalgic encephalomyelitis, but we include in the CSRS just neuropsychiatric symptoms, while systemic components of long COVID are excluded. In support of our view, studies that have already started appearing suggest that the long COVID syndrome is more likely to be associated with psychosocial factors rather than the COVID infection itself[48].
Thus, the origins of CSRS are rooted in the multi-faceted stress of the pandemic and its impact on mental health including its residuals in the post COVID era. The relevance of concomitant stressors included in daily life, under regular, non-catastrophic conditions, and their association with a mixed clinical picture, is gradually becoming apparent.
The CSRS within the debate on psychiatric nosology
Our opinion goes beyond conventional approaches for construction of psychiatric taxonomy. Alternative concepts of psychiatric validity include controversies between validation of nosological structures (typical for medicine) as compared to prototype, cluster and dimensional diagnosis of mental disorders[49]. While the field of psychiatry moved towards more medically oriented nomothetic knowledge, alternative groups which we follow in our empirical and review papers, suggest that the field has to move away from this type of knowledge towards a more ideographic and subjective approach to psychopathology[49].
The main differences between the validity of dimensional diagnostics and that of traditional nosology are apparent in several aspects: (1) In traditional approaches, mental pathology is regarded as a strict drift from acceptable norms while the transdiagnostic views, similar to ours, suggest an axis between normal and psychopathological conditions; (2) In dimensional approaches co-existing psychopathological states appear in parallel along with personal strengths and capacities for resilience, unlike traditional nomenclature; (3) Dimensional approaches to the convergent and divergent validity of a cluster or co-existence of different pathologies without meeting a full criteria of any category in the conventional systems, such as the CSRS, do justice to the patient and the entire individual clinical picture he or she describes to the clinician, while traditional approaches prefer multiple comorbidities; and (4) The dimensional approaches such as the CSRS, unlike conventional systems, emphasize subjective complaints of the patient (symptoms) rather than signs judged by the clinician. By that, these dimensional approaches are shifting the focus from the powerful societies of professionals towards the patient’s subjectivity, and they recognize that professionals too, have their own subjective perspectives to consider before endorsing a diagnosis based only on signs.
Specifically, the CSRS has shown high reliability, as in two different countries and with two different methodologies similar results were found[25]. Additionally, the CSRS has shown high convergent and divergent validity as a combination of several identified stress symptoms, without meeting any full conventional category. These findings suggest a complex and unique type of reactivity to multiplicity of stressors. Other combinations suggested earlier, as complex anxiety and depression[50] or complex post traumatic stress disorder, showed validity for inclusion of just two conventional categories[51] while others showed a too wide range of inclusion, ruling out the potential judgement of divergent validly[10].
We acknowledge the importance of biological validation of psychiatric illness, but this still cannot be utilized for a treatment per any specified condition until the field of neuropsychiatric science advances considerably. The CSRS implies symptoms more than signs and subjectivity more than objectivity. The treatment derived from the CSRS would be patient-specific and session-specific, as human experience may go back and forth on the axis of elevated symptomology vs resilience and adaptive coping. Therefore, the notion of session-specific treatment requires the clinician’s diagnostic effort at every given session to reevaluate the patient’s symptomology for progression vs regression and to offer treatment accordingly. We propose that the human experience transits along time that elapses and a condition may be judged for a given patient, in a given environment at a given moment, considering how the observed syndrome has been individually experience-shaped[52-55].
It was noted earlier that the empirical validation used as the basis of conventional categories has been mostly regression statistical analyses with a weak basis for causality[49]. Contrary to any etiological arguments, we argue that the CSRS represents an association between multiplicity of stressors and a mixed clinical picture, which is worth treating to avoid further increase in the patient’s stress reactivity and future limitations of his or her resilience capacities.
We locate CSRS within the blend of the biopsychosocial model (BPS)[56] and the person-centered medicine (PCM) approach[57], as the novel CSRS is related to exogenic stressors (BPS) and occurs as a subjective complex stress reaction of the patient (PCM). Thus, as outlined here and according to our bi-national research design and findings[25], the CSRS falls within the post-modern dimensional approaches more than within any strict nosology, for better prevention and treatment. CSRS was designed and investigated from a humanistic perspective, arguing that mental health is not represented by the lack of psychopathology, while psychopathology, in turn, is a condition with an indication to treat and may be reversible.
CONCLUSION
Transdiagnostic considerations towards a change in the classification of mental disorders can be accomplished within the existing systems without ruling out the importance of differential diagnosis if these conventional systems will start to include transdiagnostic phenomena as legitimate conditions for treatment and care. This reduces the risk of diagnosing too many comorbidities and by that precluding appropriate prevention and treatment. We argue that the syndrome termed as CSRS better identifies those patients reacting in a manner that spans several conventional diagnostic categories following exposure to concomitant multiple stressors. Unlike approaches that argue for complete transformation of conventional classifications[1-5], we claim that that a specific diagnosis concerning multiplicity of stressors that result in a mixed clinical picture, is a potential contribution to the revised Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders and the International Classification of Diseases for more accurate derived prevention and treatment. The future will tell if the openness to include post-modern transdiagnostic approaches to accurately serve more patients in need and to facilitate clinical practice of each individual psychiatrist, will be part of the discussions on the next revisions of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders and the International Classification of Diseases or whether the debate and crisis in psychiatry[58] will continue.
Footnotes
Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.
Provenance and peer review: Invited article; Externally peer reviewed.
Peer-review model: Single blind
Peer-review started: April 27, 2023
First decision: May 25, 2023
Article in press: June 19, 2023
Specialty type: Psychiatry
Country/Territory of origin: United States
Peer-review report’s scientific quality classification
Grade A (Excellent): 0
Grade B (Very good): B
Grade C (Good): C
Grade D (Fair): 0
Grade E (Poor): 0
P-Reviewer: Chakrabarti S, India; Stoyanov D, Bulgaria S-Editor: Wang JJ L-Editor: A P-Editor: Wang JJ
Contributor Information
Sari Goldstein Ferber, Department of Psychology and Brain Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, United States; Psychology and Gonda Brain Research Center, Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan 5317000, Israel. sgf@udel.edu.
Gal Shoval, Department of Neuroscience, Princeton University, New Jersey, NJ 08544, United States; Geha Mental Health Center, Petah Tiqva, Israel and Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 77096, Israel.
Aron Weller, Psychology and Gonda Brain Research Center, Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan 5317000, Israel.
Gil Zalsman, Geha Mental Health Center, Petah Tiqva, Israel and Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 77096, Israel; Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, United States.
References
- 1.Kotov R, Krueger RF, Watson D, Achenbach TM, Althoff RR, Bagby RM, Brown TA, Carpenter WT, Caspi A, Clark LA, Eaton NR, Forbes MK, Forbush KT, Goldberg D, Hasin D, Hyman SE, Ivanova MY, Lynam DR, Markon K, Miller JD, Moffitt TE, Morey LC, Mullins-Sweatt SN, Ormel J, Patrick CJ, Regier DA, Rescorla L, Ruggero CJ, Samuel DB, Sellbom M, Simms LJ, Skodol AE, Slade T, South SC, Tackett JL, Waldman ID, Waszczuk MA, Widiger TA, Wright AGC, Zimmerman M. The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): A dimensional alternative to traditional nosologies. J Abnorm Psychol. 2017;126:454–477. doi: 10.1037/abn0000258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Casey BJ, Craddock N, Cuthbert BN, Hyman SE, Lee FS, Ressler KJ. DSM-5 and RDoC: progress in psychiatry research? Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013;14:810–814. doi: 10.1038/nrn3621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Clementz BA, Sweeney JA, Hamm JP, Ivleva EI, Ethridge LE, Pearlson GD, Keshavan MS, Tamminga CA. Identification of Distinct Psychosis Biotypes Using Brain-Based Biomarkers. Am J Psychiatry. 2016;173:373–384. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2015.14091200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Reininghaus U, Böhnke JR, Chavez-Baldini U, Gibbons R, Ivleva E, Clementz BA, Pearlson GD, Keshavan MS, Sweeney JA, Tamminga CA. Transdiagnostic dimensions of psychosis in the Bipolar-Schizophrenia Network on Intermediate Phenotypes (B-SNIP) World Psychiatry. 2019;18:67–76. doi: 10.1002/wps.20607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Caraci F, Enna SJ, Zohar J, Racagni G, Zalsman G, van den Brink W, Kasper S, Koob GF, Pariante CM, Piazza PV, Yamada K, Spedding M, Drago F. A new nomenclature for classifying psychotropic drugs. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2017;83:1614–1616. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Nasrallah HA. Re-inventing the DSM as a transdiagnostic model: Psychiatric disorders are extensively interconnected. Ann Clin Psychiatry. 2021;33:148–150. doi: 10.12788/acp.0037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sambuco N, Bradley MM, Lang PJ. Hippocampal and amygdala volumes vary with transdiagnostic psychopathological dimensions of distress, anxious arousal, and trauma. Biol Psychol. 2023;177:108501. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2023.108501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Gudmundsson OO, Walters GB, Ingason A, Johansson S, Zayats T, Athanasiu L, Sonderby IE, Gustafsson O, Nawaz MS, Jonsson GF, Jonsson L, Knappskog PM, Ingvarsdottir E, Davidsdottir K, Djurovic S, Knudsen GPS, Askeland RB, Haraldsdottir GS, Baldursson G, Magnusson P, Sigurdsson E, Gudbjartsson DF, Stefansson H, Andreassen OA, Haavik J, Reichborn-Kjennerud T, Stefansson K. Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder shares copy number variant risk with schizophrenia and autism spectrum disorder. Transl Psychiatry. 2019;9:258. doi: 10.1038/s41398-019-0599-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Gong Q, Scarpazza C, Dai J, He M, Xu X, Shi Y, Zhou B, Vieira S, McCrory E, Ai Y, Yang C, Zhang F, Lui S, Mechelli A. A transdiagnostic neuroanatomical signature of psychiatric illness. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2019;44:869–875. doi: 10.1038/s41386-018-0175-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Parkes L, Satterthwaite TD, Bassett DS. Towards precise resting-state fMRI biomarkers in psychiatry: synthesizing developments in transdiagnostic research, dimensional models of psychopathology, and normative neurodevelopment. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2020;65:120–128. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2020.10.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Vardi N, Zalsman G, Madjar N, Weizman A, Shoval G. COVID-19 pandemic: Impacts on mothers' and infants' mental health during pregnancy and shortly thereafter. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2022;27:82–88. doi: 10.1177/13591045211009297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Corley SS, Ornstein KA, Rasul R, Lieberman-Cribbin W, Maisel H, Taioli E, Schwartz RM. Mental Health Effects of Hurricane Sandy on Older Adults. J Appl Gerontol. 2022;41:1131–1142. doi: 10.1177/07334648211052992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ettman CK, Cohen GH, Abdalla SM, Sampson L, Trinquart L, Castrucci BC, Bork RH, Clark MA, Wilson I, Vivier PM, Galea S. Persistent depressive symptoms during COVID-19: a national, population-representative, longitudinal study of U.S. adults. Lancet Reg Health Am. 2022;5:100091. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2021.100091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Stephenson T, Pinto Pereira SM, Shafran R, de Stavola BL, Rojas N, McOwat K, Simmons R, Zavala M, O'Mahoney L, Chalder T, Crawley E, Ford TJ, Harnden A, Heyman I, Swann O, Whittaker E CLoCk Consortium, Ladhani SN. Physical and mental health 3 months after SARS-CoV-2 infection (long COVID) among adolescents in England (CLoCk): a national matched cohort study. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2022;6:230–239. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(22)00022-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Cherry KE, De Vito AN, Calamia MR, Elliott EM, Yu S, Sampson L, Galea S, Mansoor M, McKneely KJ, Nguyen QP. Disaster stressors and psychological well-being in older adults after a flood. Psychol Aging. 2021;36:660–666. doi: 10.1037/pag0000602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Waddell SL, Jayaweera DT, Mirsaeidi M, Beier JC, Kumar N. Perspectives on the Health Effects of Hurricanes: A Review and Challenges. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18 doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052756. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Fernandez CA, Choi KW, Marshall BDL, Vicente B, Saldivia S, Kohn R, Koenen KC, Arheart KL, Buka SL. Assessing the relationship between psychosocial stressors and psychiatric resilience among Chilean disaster survivors. Br J Psychiatry. 2020;217:630–637. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2020.88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Khan F, Eskander N, Limbana T, Salman Z, Siddiqui PA, Hussaini S. Refugee and Migrant Children's Mental Healthcare: Serving the Voiceless, Invisible, and the Vulnerable Global Citizens. Cureus. 2020;12:e9944. doi: 10.7759/cureus.9944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Bremner JD, Wittbrodt MT. Stress, the brain, and trauma spectrum disorders. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2020;152:1–22. doi: 10.1016/bs.irn.2020.01.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Bustamante LHU, Cerqueira RO, Leclerc E, Brietzke E. Stress, trauma, and posttraumatic stress disorder in migrants: a comprehensive review. Braz J Psychiatry. 2018;40:220–225. doi: 10.1590/1516-4446-2017-2290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Arial M, Gonik V, Wild P, Danuser B. Association of work related chronic stressors and psychiatric symptoms in a Swiss sample of police officers; a cross sectional questionnaire study. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2010;83:323–331. doi: 10.1007/s00420-009-0500-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Costa E Silva JA, Steffen RE. Urban environment and psychiatric disorders: a review of the neuroscience and biology. Metabolism. 2019;100S:153940. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2019.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Szabo CP. Urbanization and mental health: a developing world perspective. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2018;31:256–257. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Goldstein Ferber S, Shoval G, Zalsman G, Weller A. Does COVID-19 related symptomatology indicate a transdiagnostic neuropsychiatric disorder? - Multidisciplinary implications. World J Psychiatry. 2022;12:1004–1015. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v12.i8.1004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Goldstein Ferber S, Shoval G, Rossi R, Trezza V, Di Lorenzo G, Zalsman G, Weller A, Mann JJ. Transdiagnostic considerations of mental health for the post-COVID era: Lessons from the first surge of the pandemic. World J Clin Cases. 2023;11:809–820. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i4.809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. New York: Springer, 1984. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ferber SG, Weller A, Maor R, Feldman Y, Harel-Fisch Y, Mikulincer M. Perceived social support in the social distancing era: the association between circles of potential support and COVID-19 reactive psychopathology. Anxiety Stress Coping. 2022;35:58–71. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2021.1987418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Liu X, Zhu M, Zhang R, Zhang J, Zhang C, Liu P, Feng Z, Chen Z. Public mental health problems during COVID-19 pandemic: a large-scale meta-analysis of the evidence. Transl Psychiatry. 2021;11:384. doi: 10.1038/s41398-021-01501-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.van Hees ML, Rotter T, Ellermann T, Evers SM. The effectiveness of individual interpersonal psychotherapy as a treatment for major depressive disorder in adult outpatients: a systematic review. BMC Psychiatry. 2013;13:22. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-13-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Fairburn CG, Bailey-Straebler S, Basden S, Doll HA, Jones R, Murphy R, O'Connor ME, Cooper Z. A transdiagnostic comparison of enhanced cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT-E) and interpersonal psychotherapy in the treatment of eating disorders. Behav Res Ther. 2015;70:64–71. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2015.04.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Luty SE, Carter JD, McKenzie JM, Rae AM, Frampton CM, Mulder RT, Joyce PR. Randomised controlled trial of interpersonal psychotherapy and cognitive-behavioural therapy for depression. Br J Psychiatry. 2007;190:496–502. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.106.024729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Lemmens LHJM, Galindo-Garre F, Arntz A, Peeters F, Hollon SD, DeRubeis RJ, Huibers MJH. Exploring mechanisms of change in cognitive therapy and interpersonal psychotherapy for adult depression. Behav Res Ther. 2017;94:81–92. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2017.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Southward MW, Terrill DR, Sauer-Zavala S. The effects of the Unified Protocol and Unified Protocol skills on loneliness in the COVID-19 pandemic. Depress Anxiety. 2022;39:913–921. doi: 10.1002/da.23297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Yan K, Yusufi MH, Nazari N. Application of unified protocol as a transdiagnostic treatment for emotional disorders during COVID-19: An internet-delivered randomized controlled trial. World J Clin Cases. 2022;10:8599–8614. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i24.8599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Halliday ER, Cepeda SL, Grassie HL, Jensen-Doss A, Ehrenreich-May J. Initial Effects of a Brief Transdiagnostic Intervention on Parent Emotion Management During COVID-19. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2022:1–12. doi: 10.1007/s10578-022-01409-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ehrenreich-May J, Halliday ER, Karlovich AR, Gruen RL, Pino AC, Tonarely NA. Brief Transdiagnostic Intervention for Parents With Emotional Disorder Symptoms During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Example. Cogn Behav Pract. 2021;28:690–700. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpra.2021.01.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Goldstein Ferber S, Shoval G, Zalsman G, Mikulincer M, Weller A. Between Action and Emotional Survival During the COVID-19 era: Sensorimotor Pathways as Control Systems of Transdiagnostic Anxiety-Related Intolerance to Uncertainty. Front Psychiatry. 2021;12:680403. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.680403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Xiong J, Lipsitz O, Nasri F, Lui LMW, Gill H, Phan L, Chen-Li D, Iacobucci M, Ho R, Majeed A, McIntyre RS. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on mental health in the general population: A systematic review. J Affect Disord. 2020;277:55–64. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.08.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.World Health Organization. Mental health in emergencies. [cited 10 January 2023]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/mental-health-in-emergencies .
- 40.Marciano L, Ostroumova M, Schulz PJ, Camerini AL. Digital Media Use and Adolescents' Mental Health During the Covid-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Public Health. 2021;9:793868. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.793868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Cauberghe V, Van Wesenbeeck I, De Jans S, Hudders L, Ponnet K. How Adolescents Use Social Media to Cope with Feelings of Loneliness and Anxiety During COVID-19 Lockdown. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2021;24:250–257. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2020.0478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Kellerman JK, Hamilton JL, Selby EA, Kleiman EM. The Mental Health Impact of Daily News Exposure During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Ecological Momentary Assessment Study. JMIR Ment Health. 2022;9:e36966. doi: 10.2196/36966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Pierce M, Hope H, Ford T, Hatch S, Hotopf M, John A, Kontopantelis E, Webb R, Wessely S, McManus S, Abel KM. Mental health before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal probability sample survey of the UK population. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020;7:883–892. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30308-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Witteveen AB, Young SY, Cuijpers P, Ayuso-Mateos JL, Barbui C, Bertolini F, Cabello M, Cadorin C, Downes N, Franzoi D, Gasior M, Gray B, Melchior M, van Ommeren M, Palantza C, Purgato M, van der Waerden J, Wang S, Sijbrandij M. COVID-19 and common mental health symptoms in the early phase of the pandemic: An umbrella review of the evidence. PLoS Med. 2023;20:e1004206. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Hjorthøj C, Madsen T. Mental health and the covid-19 pandemic. BMJ. 2023;380:435. doi: 10.1136/bmj.p435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Goodwin GM. The overlap between anxiety, depression, and obsessive-compulsive disorder. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2015;17:249–260. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2015.17.3/ggoodwin. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Simon GE, VonKorff M, Piccinelli M, Fullerton C, Ormel J. An international study of the relation between somatic symptoms and depression. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:1329–1335. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199910283411801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Selvakumar J, Havdal LB, Drevvatne M, Brodwall EM, Lund Berven L, Stiansen-Sonerud T, Einvik G, Leegaard TM, Tjade T, Michelsen AE, Mollnes TE, Lund-Johansen F, Holmøy T, Zetterberg H, Blennow K, Sandler CX, Cvejic E, Lloyd AR, Wyller VBB. Prevalence and Characteristics Associated With Post-COVID-19 Condition Among Nonhospitalized Adolescents and Young Adults. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6:e235763. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.5763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Di Nicola V, Stoyanov D. Psychiatric Nosology Revisited: At the Crossroads of Psychology and Medicine. Psychiatry Cris. 2021:31–41. [Google Scholar]
- 50.Curtiss J, Klemanski DH. Taxonicity and network structure of generalized anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder: An admixture analysis and complex network analysis. J Affect Disord. 2016;199:99–105. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Cloitre M, Brewin CR, Bisson JI, Hyland P, Karatzias T, Lueger-Schuster B, Maercker A, Roberts NP, Shevlin M. Evidence for the coherence and integrity of the complex PTSD (CPTSD) diagnosis: response to Achterhof et al., (2019) and Ford (2020) Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2020;11:1739873. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2020.1739873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Goldstein Ferber S, Weller A, Soreq H. Control System Theory revisited: New insights on the brain clocks of time-to-action reactions. Front Neurosci. 2023:17. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1171765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Sirois S, Spratling M, Thomas MS, Westermann G, Mareschal D, Johnson MH. Précis of neuroconstructivism: how the brain constructs cognition. Behav Brain Sci. 2008;31:321–31; discussion 331. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X0800407X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Ferber SG. The concept of coregulation between neurobehavioral subsystems: the logic interplay between excitatory and inhibitory ends. Behavior Brain Sci. 2008;31:337–338. [Google Scholar]
- 55.Broadbent H, Mareschal D. Neuroconstructivism. In: The Encyclopedia of Child and Adolescent Development. United States: John Wiley & Sons, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- 56.Smith RC. Making the biopsychosocial model more scientific-its general and specific models. Soc Sci Med. 2021;272:113568. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Mezzich JE, Salloum IM, Cloninger CR, Salvador-Carulla L, Kirmayer LJ, Banzato CE, Wallcraft J, Botbol M. Person-centred integrative diagnosis: conceptual bases and structural model. Can J Psychiatry. 2010;55:701–708. doi: 10.1177/070674371005501103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Di Nicola V, Stoyanov D. Psychiatry in crisis: At the crossroads of social sciences, the humanities, and neuroscience. Psychiatry Cris. 2020:1–174. [Google Scholar]