Table 3.
BIOMARKER-SURROGATE EVALUATION SCHEMA (BSES) 3 | SU score | ||
---|---|---|---|
|
|||
Biomarker-surrogate domains | Score | ||
Study design | 0 | Biological plausibility & lower quality clinical studies e.g. cross-sectional observational studies | |
1 | Rank 0 and at least 2 good quality prospective observational cohort studies measuring S and T | ||
2 | Rank 1 and at least 2 high quality adequately powered RCTs measuring S and T | ||
3 | Rank 1 and all, and at least 5 high quality adequately powered, RCTs measuring S and T | X | |
Target outcome | 0 | Target is reversible disease-centered biomarker of harm | |
1 | Target is irreversible disease-centered biomarker of harm | ||
2 | Target is patient-centered endpoint of reversible organ morbidity or clinical burden of disease or clinical harm | X | |
3 | Target is patient-centered endpoint of irreversible organ morbidity or clinical burden of disease or severe irreversible clinical harm or death | ||
Statistical Evaluation of biosurrogate — Target (B-T) domai | 0 | Poor: Does not meet the criteria for Rank 1 | X |
1 | Fair: RCT R2trial≥0.2 AND STEP* ≥ 0.1 AND R2ind ≥ 0.2 OR cohort data R2ind ≥ 0.4 | ||
2 | Good: RCT R2trial ≥ 0.4 AND STEP ≥ 0.2 AND R2ind ≥ 0.4 | ||
3 | Excellent: RCT R2trial ≥ 0.6 AND STEP ≥ 0.3 AND R2ind ≥ 0.6 (without data subdivision)** | ||
Generalizability | 0 | No clinical or pharmacologic evidence | |
1 | Clinical OR pharmacologic evidence | ||
2 | Clinical AND pharmacologic evidence | ||
3 | Consistent Clinical RCT AND pharmacologic RCT evidence | X | |
TOTAL |
Score: Level A 12, Level B+, B, B− 11-9, Level C+, C, C−, D+, D, D− 8-6, Level D+, D, D−, E+, E, E− 5-3, Level E+, E, E−, F+, F, F-2-0