Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 21;14:1187042. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1187042

Table 3.

Intra-observer agreement on the measurement of imaging parameters.

Parameters Groups Observer 1 Observer 2 ICC values
Cortex FF values (%) Group A (n = 18) 1.13 (0.61, 1.58) 1.06 (0.70, 1.65) 0.915
Group B (n = 17) 1.72 (1.31, 2.61) 1.60 (1.31, 2.49) 0.997
Group C (n = 22) 1.19 (0.90, 2.01) 1.23 (0.79, 2.14) 0.987
medulla FF values (%) Group A (n = 18) 0.90 (0.63, 1.73) 1.22 (0.90, 2.39) 0.854
Group B (n = 17) 1.71 (0.87, 4.26) 2.56 (1.50, 3.78) 0.942
Group C (n = 22) 1.28 (0.65, 2.02) 1.42 (1.07, 2.72) 0.821
cortex R2* values (/s) Group A (n = 18) 17.23 (16.14, 19.02) 18.21 (16.37, 19.59) 0.763
Group B (n = 17) 18.81 (16.55, 20.05) 19.31 (17.80, 20.05) 0.954
Group C (n = 22) 15.38 (14.45, 16.92) 17.04 (14.69, 18.14) 0.857
medulla R2* values (/s) Group A (n = 18) 21.60 (19.28, 23.53) 21.69 (17.48, 26.59) 0.860
Group B (n = 17) 21.34 (17.60, 22.80) 21.56 (17.48, 23.62) 0.972
Group C (n = 22) 19.82 (19.01, 20.73) 22.52 (19.46, 23.42) 0.759

Observer 1 and 2, two radiologists with 8 years and 2 years of experiences in abdominal imaging; ICC, intra-class correlation; ICC values lower than 0.40, between 0.40 and 0.75 and greater than 0.75 were considered to have low, medium, and high consistency, respectively; Group A, mild renal damage group; group B, moderate to severe renal damage group; group C, healthy control group; FF, fat fraction; R2*, transverse relaxation rate.