Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 7;2015(8):CD011834. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011834

BDIT Pilot Studies 1996.

Methods RCT
Participants Women with mammographic dysplasia (Canada)
 CVD risk: low
 Control: 147 randomised, 78 analysed
 Intervention: 148 randomised, 76 analysed
 Mean years in trial: control 7.5, intervention 6.8
 % male: 0
 Age: mean control 45, intervention 44 (all > 30)
Baseline BMI: mean intervention 24.3 (SD 3.8), control 24.3 (SD 3.6)
Interventions Reduced fat intake vs usual diet
Control aims: healthy diet advice, no alteration in dietary fat advised, aim to maintain weight
 Intervention aims: total fat 15%E, replace fat by complex CHO, aim to maintain weight
Control methods: seen for advice once every 4 months for 12 months
Intervention methods: seen for advice once a month for 12 months
Weight goal: low fat group ‐ "isocaloric exchange of complex carbohydrate for fat. We tried to maintain an isocaloric diet to avoid weight loss...". Not discussed for control group
Total fat intake (at 9.2 years): low fat 31.7 (SD 7.3) %E, control 35.3 (SD 5.6) %E
Saturated fat intake (at 9.2 years): low fat 10.6 (SD 4.6) %E, control 12.3 (SD 4.6) %E
Style: diet advice
Setting: community
Outcomes Stated trial outcomes: dietary fat, serum cholesterol
Available outcomes: weight, BMI, total and HDL cholesterol
Notes Weight data available for 1 year, 2 years and 9 years. Unclear whether participants were still in the trial by 9 years, so 2‐year data used in main analysis
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk "randomly allocated"
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Randomisation not described
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Participants not blinded, but outcome assessors blinded to intervention
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes High risk 141 of 295 (48%) lost over 8 years (> 5% per year)
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Protocol not seen
Other bias Low risk  
Free of systematic difference in care? High risk Minor: women in intervention group seen more frequently. See 'Control methods' and 'Intervention methods' in the 'Interventions' section above
Free of dietary differences other than fat? Low risk See 'Control aims' and 'Intervention aims' in the 'Interventions' section above