BDIT Pilot Studies 1996.
Methods | RCT | |
Participants | Women with mammographic dysplasia (Canada)
CVD risk: low
Control: 147 randomised, 78 analysed
Intervention: 148 randomised, 76 analysed
Mean years in trial: control 7.5, intervention 6.8
% male: 0
Age: mean control 45, intervention 44 (all > 30) Baseline BMI: mean intervention 24.3 (SD 3.8), control 24.3 (SD 3.6) |
|
Interventions | Reduced fat intake vs usual diet Control aims: healthy diet advice, no alteration in dietary fat advised, aim to maintain weight Intervention aims: total fat 15%E, replace fat by complex CHO, aim to maintain weight Control methods: seen for advice once every 4 months for 12 months Intervention methods: seen for advice once a month for 12 months Weight goal: low fat group ‐ "isocaloric exchange of complex carbohydrate for fat. We tried to maintain an isocaloric diet to avoid weight loss...". Not discussed for control group Total fat intake (at 9.2 years): low fat 31.7 (SD 7.3) %E, control 35.3 (SD 5.6) %E Saturated fat intake (at 9.2 years): low fat 10.6 (SD 4.6) %E, control 12.3 (SD 4.6) %E Style: diet advice Setting: community |
|
Outcomes | Stated trial outcomes: dietary fat, serum cholesterol Available outcomes: weight, BMI, total and HDL cholesterol |
|
Notes | Weight data available for 1 year, 2 years and 9 years. Unclear whether participants were still in the trial by 9 years, so 2‐year data used in main analysis | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | "randomly allocated" |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Randomisation not described |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | Participants not blinded, but outcome assessors blinded to intervention |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | 141 of 295 (48%) lost over 8 years (> 5% per year) |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Protocol not seen |
Other bias | Low risk | |
Free of systematic difference in care? | High risk | Minor: women in intervention group seen more frequently. See 'Control methods' and 'Intervention methods' in the 'Interventions' section above |
Free of dietary differences other than fat? | Low risk | See 'Control aims' and 'Intervention aims' in the 'Interventions' section above |