Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 7;2015(8):CD011834. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011834

WHT:FSMP 2003.

Methods RCT
Participants Postmenopausal women from diverse ethnic and socioeconomic backgrounds (USA)
 CVD risk: low
 Control: randomised 883, analysed 649 at 6 mo, 443 at 12 mo, 194 at 18 mo
 Intervention: randomised 1325, analysed 1071 at 6 mo, 698 at 12 mo, 285 at 18 mo
 Mean years in trial: unclear, follow‐up from 6 to 18 months
 % male: 0%
 Age: mean control 59.8 (SD 6.6), intervention 60.1 (SD 6.6)
Baseline BMI: 28.8 (SD 4.7) for all
Interventions Reduced fat vs usual diet
Control aims: maintain usual diet
 Intervention aims: up to 20%E from fat, reduced saturated fat and dietary cholesterol, increased fruit, vegetables and whole grains
Control methods: pamphlet on general dietary guidelines provided, no other follow‐up, seen at baseline, then 6, 12 and 18 months for assessment
Intervention methods: women allocated to groups of 8 to 15 women with a nutritionist leader, meeting weekly for 6 weeks, bi‐weekly for 9 months then quarterly. Women provided with personal fat gram goals
Weight goals: weight and calories not mentioned
Total fat intake (at 1 year): intervention 25.4 (SD unclear), control 36.0 (SD unclear) %E
Saturated fat intake (at 1 year): intervention 8.7 (SD unclear), control 12.1 (SD unclear) %E
Style: diet advice
Setting: community
Outcomes Stated trial outcomes: dietary intake/feasibility
Available outcomes: weight, BMI, blood pressure
Notes Weight and BMI data only found for 6 months of intervention
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk "randomised"
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not discussed
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk No for participants, though outcome assessors were blinded
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk All those randomised were analysed for weight
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk For weight
Other bias Low risk  
Free of systematic difference in care? High risk Greater time and support provided to intervention group
Free of dietary differences other than fat? High risk Suggestion to intervention group to increase fruit, vegetable and whole grain intakes