Table 1. Results of different methods on the dataset PEMSBAY.
| Classification | Methods | PEMSBAY (10/15/20 min) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAE | MAPE (%) | RMSE | ||
| Classical methods | HA | 2.41/2.48/2.56 | 5.62/5.78/5.97 | 5.37/5.58/5.76 |
| SVR | 1.43/1.60/1.74 | 3.46/3.87/4.26 | 3.23/3.60/3.94 | |
| RF | 1.35/1.54/1.72 | 2.90/3.42/3.90 | 2.69/3.15/3.56 | |
| KNN | 1.45/1.62/1.78 | 3.20/3.65/4.08 | 2.92/3.34/3.72 | |
| State-of-the-Art methods | STGCN | 1.39/1.68/2.02 | 3.24/4.02/5.11 | 2.50/3.10/3.67 |
| FC-GAGA | 1.36/1.65/1.83 | 3.08/3.91/4.44 | 2.69/3.45/3.97 | |
| AGCRN | 1.37/1.47/1.58 | 3.23/3.50/3.76 | 2.77/3.03/3.27 | |
| Our methods | GST-HCN | 1.32/1.51/1.68 | 3.17/3.71/4.21 | 2.41/2.82/3.18 |
| HST-HCN | 1.41/1.60/1.76 | 3.68/4.18/4.64 | 2.61/3.01/3.31 | |
| LST-HCN | 1.25/1.46/1.64 | 2.81/3.45/3.96 | 2.27/2.73/3.11 | |
| ST-HCN | 1.22/1.40/1.57 | 2.73/3.23/3.73 | 2.19/2.58/2.94 | |
Notes.
The best experimental results for each setting are bolded.