Table 2. Results of different methods on the dataset PEMSM.
| Classification | Methods | PEMSM (10/15/20 min) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAE | MAPE (%) | RMSE | ||
| Classical methods | HA | 3.14/3.22/3.32 | 7.60/7.81/8.03 | 6.09/6.29/6.49 |
| SVR | 1.78/2.01/2.21 | 4.45/5.03/5.54 | 3.44/3.92/4.36 | |
| RF | 1.82/2.10/2.34 | 4.24/4.95/5.60 | 3.19/3.76/4.25 | |
| KNN | 1.96/2.21/2.43 | 4.64/5.28/5.87 | 3.48/3.99/4.44 | |
| State-of-the-Art methods | STGCN | 1.87/2.29/2.60 | 4.32/5.38/6.19 | 3.16/3.93/4.46 |
| FC-GAGA | 1.86/2.20/2.45 | 4.36/5.26/5.98 | 3.38/4.16/4.77 | |
| AGCRN | 1.82/1.96/2.09 | 4.39/4.75/5.08 | 3.28/3.60/3.89 | |
| Our methods | GST-HCN | 1.74/2.00/2.21 | 4.15/4.79/5.37 | 2.94/3.41/3.82 |
| HST-HCN | 1.72/1.97/2.19 | 4.07/4.74/5.29 | 2.90/3.39/3.75 | |
| LST-HCN | 1.68/1.96/2.18 | 3.87/4.56/5.22 | 2.88/3.40/3.82 | |
| ST-HCN | 1.62/1.86/2.08 | 3.72/4.34/4.98 | 2.77/3.23/3.63 | |
Notes.
The best experimental results for each setting are bolded.