Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 28;9:e1488. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.1488

Table 3. Quantitative comparison (mean ± STD) of model variants with different numbers of shallow and deep feature maps on the reduced-resolution QB testing set.

The best results are bold. CS is the number of shallow feature maps. CD is the number of deep feature maps.

C S C D SAM ERGAS sCC Q4 Dλ DS HQNR
10 10 1.1602 ± 0.4216 0.8120 ± 0.3043 0.9908 ± 0.0053 0.9451 ± 0.0674 0.0307 ± 0.0284 0.0469 ± 0.0473 0.9249 ± 0.0650
16 8 1.1138 ± 0.4043 0.7738 ± 0.2898 0.9917 ± 0.0049 0.9488 ± 0.0651 0.0267 ± 0.0211 0.0426 ± 0.0392 0.9324 ± 0.0527
20 6 1.1662 ± 0.4237 0.8147 ± 0.3044 0.9907 ± 0.0053 0.9451 ± 0.0664 0.0281 ± 0.0288 0.0444 ± 0.0482 0.9298 ± 0.0651
Ideal value 0 0 1 1 0 0 1