Table 5. Quantitative comparison of different methods on the reduced-resolution QB testing set.
The best results are bold and the second-best results are underlined.
| SAM | ERGAS | sCC | Q4 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSA | 1.9273 ± 0.8478 | 1.4668 ± 0.6854 | 0.9678 ± 0.0251 | 0.8788 ± 0.0931 |
| BDSD | 1.9180 ± 0.8243 | 1.4297 ± 0.6622 | 0.9736 ± 0.0193 | 0.8888 ± 0.0829 |
| MTF-GLP-FS | 1.8771 ± 0.8068 | 1.4589 ± 0.6426 | 0.9691 ± 0.0234 | 0.8812 ± 0.0871 |
| TV | 1.9741 ± 0.8194 | 1.8726 ± 0.9622 | 0.9656 ± 0.0191 | 0.8245 ± 0.1316 |
| PNN | 1.4217 ± 0.5216 | 1.0570 ± 0.3631 | 0.9850 ± 0.0096 | 0.9107 ± 0.0866 |
| MSDCNN | 1.2629 ± 0.4563 | 0.9011 ± 0.3213 | 0.9886 ± 0.0064 | 0.9328 ± 0.0747 |
| DR-NET | 1.1280 ± 0.4101 | 0.7855 ± 0.2957 | 0.9918 ± 0.0048 | 0.9475 ± 0.0662 |
| Zhou et al. | 1.1601 ± 0.4196 | 0.8130 ± 0.3062 | 0.9907 ± 0.0054 | 0.9447 ± 0.0675 |
| Ours | 1.1138 ± 0.4043 | 0.7738 ± 0.2898 | 0.9917± 0.0049 | 0.9488 ± 0.0651 |
| Ideal value | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |