Table 6. Quantitative comparison of different methods on the reduced-resolution WV3 testing set.
The best results are bold and the second-best results are underlined.
| SAM | ERGAS | sCC | Q4 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSA | 5.1082 ± 2.3376 | 3.8059 ± 1.7799 | 0.9455 ± 0.0395 | 0.8779 ± 0.1224 |
| BDSD | 5.6257 ± 2.6578 | 4.0366 ± 1.8778 | 0.9536 ± 0.0281 | 0.8688 ± 0.1314 |
| MTF-GLP-FS | 5.0723 ± 2.2696 | 3.8957 ± 1.7825 | 0.9466 ± 0.0365 | 0.8746 ± 0.1176 |
| TV | 5.2736 ± 2.0988 | 4.1111 ± 1.5417 | 0.9435 ± 0.0309 | 0.8538 ± 0.1356 |
| PNN | 3.4963 ± 1.2863 | 2.6023 ± 1.2673 | 0.9810 ± 0.0132 | 0.9126 ± 0.1228 |
| MSDCNN | 3.4077 ± 1.1944 | 2.4896 ± 1.1989 | 0.9829 ± 0.0123 | 0.9218 ± 0.1213 |
| DR-NET | 2.9762 ± 1.2064 | 2.2273 ± 1.2094 | 0.9871 ± 0.0119 | 0.9298 ± 0.1152 |
| Zhou et al. (2022) | 3.0180 ± 1.1999 | 2.2440 ± 1.1637 | 0.9861 ± 0.0114 | 0.9286 ± 0.1156 |
| Ours | 2.9452 ± 1.1927 | 2.1842 ± 1.1480 | 0.9871 ± 0.0112 | 0.9308 ± 0.1165 |
| Ideal value | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |