Table 7. Quantitative comparison of different methods on the full-resolution QB testing set.
The best results are bold and the second-best results are underlined.
| Dλ | DS | HQNR | |
|---|---|---|---|
| GSA | 0.0796 ± 0.0713 | 0.1216 ± 0.0980 | 0.8146 ± 0.1328 |
| BDSD | 0.0701 ± 0.0470 | 0.0734 ± 0.0647 | 0.8636 ± 0.0908 |
| MTF-GLP-FS | 0.0413 ± 0.0337 | 0.0887 ± 0.0786 | 0.8748 ± 0.0895 |
| TV | 0.1398 ± 0.1483 | 0.0692 ± 0.0390 | 0.8024 ± 0.1511 |
| PNN | 0.0619 ± 0.0700 | 0.0554 ± 0.0572 | 0.8887 ± 0.0986 |
| MSDCNN | 0.0498 ± 0.0582 | 0.0514 ± 0.0507 | 0.9031 ± 0.0862 |
| DR-NET | 0.0498 ± 0.0636 | 0.0495 ± 0.0467 | 0.9050 ± 0.0891 |
| Zhou et al. (2022) | 0.0333 ± 0.0290 | 0.0486 ± 0.0493 | 0.9208 ± 0.0675 |
| Ours | 0.0267 ± 0.0211 | 0.0426 ± 0.0392 | 0.9324 ± 0.0527 |
| Ideal value | 0 | 0 | 1 |